I would like an honest answer here
I'd love to get a 1 ton, problem is, unless the "build your own truck" thing is broken, every time I click on 1 ton, it kicks me into a dually. I don't want a dually. If I get a dually, I can guarantee that my wife will never drive again, which kinda defeats the purpose. Anyway, I'd love to do the 1 ton, but again, is it duals now?
T.
T.
Originally Posted by WACTD
. The only difference (I'm told) is stronger frame rails and extra leaves in the rear springs. Why not have more capacity in the same sized package?
There's a "single rear wheel" (SRW) option for the 3500. It's standard if you get a short bed 3500, and optional on the long bed. You should confirm this with a dealer, as I've heard that in various years the SRW option was/wasn't available on long bed 3500's. Check to see what's possible on 2006's these days.
the tranny Edited for inappropriate language rocks
Forum Rules
You agree, through your use of the DieselTruckResource.Com forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, racially based or biased, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law.
Forum Rules
You agree, through your use of the DieselTruckResource.Com forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, racially based or biased, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of ANY law.
My insurance went DOWN!!!
Get this: When I bought my 3500, I was driving a 13 year old Nissan Pathfinder. I expected my insurance to go up, of course, but when we called our agent (MetLife) he said it would go DOWN.
Reason? It turns out traditional SUV's (4Runner, Pathfinder) are packed so tight in the engine compartment area that even minor accidents tend to cause major, expensive damage to the engine rather than just cosmetic damage to the body. As a result, it was less expensive to insure a brand-new 3500 than my 13 year old, 114K mile Pathfinder.
Add to that the fact that my 3500 is getting about the same mileage as my Pathfinder always did, while giving my WAY more passenger/load volume and weight/towing capacity, and it's no wonder I'm happy about my truck!
Reason? It turns out traditional SUV's (4Runner, Pathfinder) are packed so tight in the engine compartment area that even minor accidents tend to cause major, expensive damage to the engine rather than just cosmetic damage to the body. As a result, it was less expensive to insure a brand-new 3500 than my 13 year old, 114K mile Pathfinder.
Add to that the fact that my 3500 is getting about the same mileage as my Pathfinder always did, while giving my WAY more passenger/load volume and weight/towing capacity, and it's no wonder I'm happy about my truck!
Originally Posted by WACTD
I agree with the one ton/3500 comment. I was headed toward a 2500 when I realized that for ~$300 more I could have the 3500. The trucks are the same height, same width, same length, same engine, same transmission. The only difference (I'm told) is stronger frame rails and extra leaves in the rear springs. Why not have more capacity in the same sized package?
Uh, unnecessary weight?
Uh, unnecessary weight?
(thats my wife nagging at me for not getting the right rig the first time!)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sabreson
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
26
Sep 24, 2010 01:54 PM
Common
General Diesel Discussion
64
Feb 28, 2009 04:47 PM




