3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Difference Between 555 & 6X0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #1  
PsRumors's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Difference Between 555 & 6X0

What is the difference between the 555s and 6x0 engines? Is it all electronic or are there mechanical differences?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 09:07 AM
  #2  
RamWheelsBy4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
I believe that there are a number of changes, both mechanical and electronic. Different turbo, wastegate, exhaust, pistons, rods, computer controls, etc.

Cummins propaganda sheet for the 600:
http://www.cummins.com/na/pages/en/p...urbodiesel.cfm
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 11:51 AM
  #3  
bigblock2stroke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PsRumors
What is the difference between the 555s and 6x0 engines? Is it all electronic or are there mechanical differences?
In a nutshell, the 600/610 engine was designed to meet the emissions standards imposed by the EPA for all diesel engines sold after Jan. 1st, 2004.

Lots of difference from the 555 engine because of that. Good thing is no EGR like Ford and Chevy, bad thing is worse fuel economy from retarded timing and post injection.

Only going to get worse in January of 2007
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #4  
LinearX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Hippie
Originally Posted by RamWheelsBy4
I believe that there are a number of changes, both mechanical and electronic. Different turbo, wastegate, exhaust, pistons, rods, computer controls, etc.

Cummins propaganda sheet for the 600:
http://www.cummins.com/na/pages/en/p...urbodiesel.cfm
New pistons and rods as well? The rest of the stuff I can believe, but I can't imagine that they'd have to change the pistons and rods unless they went to a different piston that required a different length rod. Ah well...I love my 555.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 12:19 AM
  #5  
RamWheelsBy4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by LinearX
New pistons and rods as well? The rest of the stuff I can believe, but I can't imagine that they'd have to change the pistons and rods unless they went to a different piston that required a different length rod. Ah well...I love my 555.
Just reading the propaganda sheet about the 600s. Maybe I did not understand the part about rods and piston bowls, so maybe that is a stretch. But it looks to me to be a very different engine than the 555.

The 2004 Cummins 600 Turbo Diesel builds upon this durability with:

In-cylinder combustion and diesel oxidation catalyst solution requires no exhaust gas recirculation components.
Gallery cooled high-strength aluminum pistons for durability and long life to overhaul.
Premium high strength inconel exhaust valves and high-cobalt stellite exhaust valve seats for durability and long life to overhaul.
High strength exhaust manifold with multi-layer gasket between head and manifold.
Forged steel fracture-split connecting rods.

Cummins applied its technology to provide an in-cylinder solution along with a diesel oxidation catalyst. Cummins developed a new piston combustion bowl and a high flow electronically-controlled wastegated turbocharger to better match boost pressure to engine needs to reduce emissions.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 12:23 AM
  #6  
LinearX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Hippie
Originally Posted by RamWheelsBy4
Just reading the propaganda sheet about the 600s. Maybe I did not understand the part about rods and piston bowls, so maybe that is a stretch. But it looks to me to be a very different engine than the 555.

The 2004 Cummins 600 Turbo Diesel builds upon this durability with:

Average of 350,000 miles to overhaul.
Proven technology: most components are carry-over, including the Bosch high pressure common rail fuel system optimized by Cummins controls.
In-cylinder combustion and diesel oxidation catalyst solution requires no exhaust gas recirculation components.
Gallery cooled high-strength aluminum pistons for durability and long life to overhaul.
Premium high strength inconel exhaust valves and high-cobalt stellite exhaust valve seats for durability and long life to overhaul.
High strength exhaust manifold with multi-layer gasket between head and manifold.
Forged steel fracture-split connecting rods.

Cummins applied its technology to provide an in-cylinder solution along with a diesel oxidation catalyst. Cummins developed a new piston combustion bowl and a high flow electronically-controlled wastegated turbocharger to better match boost pressure to engine needs to reduce emissions.

The 555 engines had the oil cooled pistons like the 6x0 engines do. That was one of the differences between the SO and the HO engines. I would assume, then, that the rods are the same. I could be wrong, though.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #7  
bigblock2stroke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LinearX
The 555 engines had the oil cooled pistons like the 6x0 engines do. That was one of the differences between the SO and the HO engines. I would assume, then, that the rods are the same. I could be wrong, though.
Both the pistons and the rods are different.

Yes, the pistons are noozle jetted instead of the SO's gallery cooling/lubricating. However, the piston bowl is tailored to the emissions package to avoid the EGR system.

The fracture split rods were actually copied from the D-max. I know, not what you wanted to here, but its true.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #8  
LinearX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Hippie
Originally Posted by bigblock2stroke
Both the pistons and the rods are different.

Yes, the pistons are noozle jetted instead of the SO's gallery cooling/lubricating. However, the piston bowl is tailored to the emissions package to avoid the EGR system.

The fracture split rods were actually copied from the D-max. I know, not what you wanted to here, but its true.
Doesn't hurt my feelings that things are different. I'd rather learn the truth than just continuing to wonder and, in this case, argue incorrectly.

Sucks that Cummins is stealing designs from the D-Max, though.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 10:16 AM
  #9  
bigblock2stroke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LinearX
Doesn't hurt my feelings that things are different. I'd rather learn the truth than just continuing to wonder and, in this case, argue incorrectly.

Sucks that Cummins is stealing designs from the D-Max, though.
Fracture split rods cost less to make. Its a bonus that they are also stronger.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #10  
Steve034x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: North of the Frost Line....near Priddis Alberta
OK, so why does the 610's oil get black so quickly? The 555's didn't have this 'feature'. Anyone know what the engine is doing to build up that soot so quickly in the oil? Maybe if they figured out how to burn this soot we'd get the 555's better miliage.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 08:48 AM
  #11  
commonrail's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PsRumors
What is the difference between the 555s and 6x0 engines? Is it all electronic or are there mechanical differences?
Yes there is a difference....~3 - 5 MPG!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #12  
TreeFarm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: The South
Originally Posted by Steve034x4
OK, so why does the 610's oil get black so quickly? The 555's didn't have this 'feature'. Anyone know what the engine is doing to build up that soot so quickly in the oil? Maybe if they figured out how to burn this soot we'd get the 555's better miliage.
I noticed that when I checked my oil at 450 miles. I expected the oil to look almost as clean as new out of the jug. Instead, it looked like the engine had 100 hours on it.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #13  
LinearX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Hippie
Third injection event, maybe? I know that it's the primary suspect for the relatively poor fuel mileage compared to the 555. Just a guess.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 02:57 PM
  #14  
gsbrockman's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 20
From: Sand Gap, KY.
Originally Posted by commonrail
Yes there is a difference....~3 - 5 MPG!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #15  
dmurdock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by commonrail
Yes there is a difference....~3 - 5 MPG!
lol, you ain't kiddin.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.