2 Injectors Failed!
Originally Posted by Superduty
Well, you didn't drive it far or under a load, so that is good.
It is interesting that it is a 610 because I thought they changed the injectors to fix this issue.
Can you PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE get some pictures and a really good explanation of what goes wrong when this happens. Could you ask the shop foreman if it would help to pull the valve cover and torque the injector holddown bolts or fuel connector tubes to prevent this ? PLEASE ?
It is interesting that it is a 610 because I thought they changed the injectors to fix this issue.
Can you PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE get some pictures and a really good explanation of what goes wrong when this happens. Could you ask the shop foreman if it would help to pull the valve cover and torque the injector holddown bolts or fuel connector tubes to prevent this ? PLEASE ?
Originally Posted by Superduty
A sticking solenoid puts fuel into the combustion chamber, not the crankcase. Two different things as far as I know.
Or the injector body cracked and the fuel drained to the crankcase via the pushrod bores.
I too want to know how it was determined the 2 injectors failed. Smellin fishy per the usual.
"I think the fuel drained past the pistion rings into the crankcase."
To put gallons of fuel into the crankcase via piston rings would require raw fuel leaking into the combustion chamber. This would have symptoms like massive smoke, knocking, rough running, etc. Maybe hydrolocking the engine.
This had nothing to do with a sticking solenoid as far as I can tell. None of those symptoms were present. His first indication was a low fuel gauge.
This was a physical leak of fuel outside the combustion chamber into the crankcase. I gave a list of possible routes in my first post. I've heard of several of these cases, but I've never gotten a first hand account of the path the fuel took.
To put gallons of fuel into the crankcase via piston rings would require raw fuel leaking into the combustion chamber. This would have symptoms like massive smoke, knocking, rough running, etc. Maybe hydrolocking the engine.
This had nothing to do with a sticking solenoid as far as I can tell. None of those symptoms were present. His first indication was a low fuel gauge.
This was a physical leak of fuel outside the combustion chamber into the crankcase. I gave a list of possible routes in my first post. I've heard of several of these cases, but I've never gotten a first hand account of the path the fuel took.
Originally Posted by Superduty
"I think the fuel drained past the pistion rings into the crankcase."
To put gallons of fuel into the crankcase via piston rings would require raw fuel leaking into the combustion chamber. This would have symptoms like massive smoke, knocking, rough running, etc. Maybe hydrolocking the engine.
This had nothing to do with a sticking solenoid as far as I can tell. None of those symptoms were present. His first indication was a low fuel gauge.
This was a physical leak of fuel outside the combustion chamber into the crankcase. I gave a list of possible routes in my first post. I've heard of several of these cases, but I've never gotten a first hand account of the path the fuel took.
To put gallons of fuel into the crankcase via piston rings would require raw fuel leaking into the combustion chamber. This would have symptoms like massive smoke, knocking, rough running, etc. Maybe hydrolocking the engine.
This had nothing to do with a sticking solenoid as far as I can tell. None of those symptoms were present. His first indication was a low fuel gauge.
This was a physical leak of fuel outside the combustion chamber into the crankcase. I gave a list of possible routes in my first post. I've heard of several of these cases, but I've never gotten a first hand account of the path the fuel took.
I've seen that fill the crankcase very quickly with no performance change (until the crankcase breather system gets pressurized).
Originally Posted by Superduty
What do you mean on the valve cover side ? It cracked the injector body itself ?
Can I ask if you were running the box at the time ? You can PM me if you don't want to say publicly.
Can I ask if you were running the box at the time ? You can PM me if you don't want to say publicly.
Yes the box was on BUT This happened while it was idleing for a long period of time... I was waiting in a jobsite for an hour with below freezing temps so I idled it up to 1500 and sat in the truck with the heat on. When I was getting unloaded I noticed it was puffing a little "blue" smoke and when I got back in it blew blue/white smoke for a long time (5 miles) and never stopped until I had the oil changed.
Superduty , difference from the CR to the 24 valve is both use a fuel connector tube, but the CR has a constant high pressure fuel in the tube at all times with the engine running and why we call them common rail, Cummins has a note saying always replace the connector tube with the injector or always keep them together, dont miss match them with other injectors , the 24 valve fuel connector tube has high press. fuel only during the injection firing for that injector and can reuse the connector tube over with another injector. if an injector tip ever let lose on a CR injector , and I have seen the result and it destroyed that cylinder because there is a constant fuel pressure at the injector and as high as 16 bar and higher, in fact Cummins say if that ever happens, remove the head and piston for inspection. reason is liquid is not compressible and it does not take that much fuel in a cylinder at TDC to lock that engine up. so no that fuel is not going down the cylinder, and that much fuel will score up a cylinder wall. I have seen a fuel in the oil and 99% of them are from lose injector hold down. the other percent I couldnt tell you cause with even dye in the fuel it is very hard to see where that fuel is coming from and they alway go back to the factory. in the last four years, the ISBe has been out since middle of 01 for the trucks , I have seen one with a CP3 causing fuel in the oil.
I dont understand the misinstallation of the CP3 by the tech comment.... it doesnt just bolt up to the housing with flat mating surface. the CP3 is a press fit into the housing and can be a real bear to remove from the engine especially in tight quarters.
I dont understand the misinstallation of the CP3 by the tech comment.... it doesnt just bolt up to the housing with flat mating surface. the CP3 is a press fit into the housing and can be a real bear to remove from the engine especially in tight quarters.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jasonh
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
17
Jan 25, 2015 01:53 PM
Lary Ellis (Top)
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
14
Nov 15, 2002 11:00 AM




