3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

AAM 3.42 Gears

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #1  
J2Waite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
New AAM 3.42 Gears

Hey Gang,

Have any of you heard about the new 3.42 gears recently announced by AAM for the 9.25 front and 11.5 rear axles? These gears are in AAM's PowerDense line of gear sets and are designed for improved fuel economy under normal driving conditions.

Just wonder if any of you have seen them and if you can guestimate what improvement is reasonable to expect?

AAM does state that the gear set is not intended for conditions such as regular hauling, climbing grades or pulling.

Just like some thoughts as you are all smarter than I!
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 09:39 PM
  #2  
stock03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
[QUOTE=J2Waite;1867064]...AAM does state that the gear set is not intended for conditions such as regular hauling, climbing grades or pulling./QUOTE]

Can't you just down shift if you need more power for the hills? Or are the gears themselves not strong enough for the extra loads? Better MPG would be really nice.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #3  
OOPS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Roseville, CA
Originally Posted by J2Waite
AAM does state that the gear set is not intended for conditions such as regular hauling, climbing grades or pulling.
Or oversize tires.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
DiEseLjunKy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, TN
Do a search there's a megacab member here who swapped to 3:42's. I'd stick with the 3:73's and jump up in tire size.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #5  
Hounddog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 0
From: Ila georgia
A 1 to 2 mpg increase is what I read.For that a the loss of towing any kind of weight etc.is not worth it to me.Truck pushes air like a brick and the fasfter you go the harder it works.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 07:21 AM
  #6  
J2Waite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
All great points, Thanks!

I recently read somewhere that as much as 70% of fuel is consumed (expended) in an attempt to overcome the wind resistance....great big brick is right!
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 08:12 AM
  #7  
timcasbolt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: md
Depending on how much it cost for labor, I would think you'd need to drive the truck for a lot of miles before you hit the break-even point in fuel savings. A rough estimate (assuming 2 mpg savings) would be you could save about $500 in fuel per 30,000 miles.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 1, 2008 | 10:46 AM
  #8  
C Schomer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 1
From: Pueblo West
I don't get it either. The higher gears will ruin what it was built for. They are trucks and meant to work hard with the gears that are in them. I buy cars for mpg and trucks to work. Craig
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #9  
D-Roc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Cold Lake, Alberta
I would only buy those gears if both my front and rear diff blew at the same time- pretty slim chance...
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 11:01 AM
  #10  
D-Roc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Cold Lake, Alberta
But it sure would be nice! Then I would add 285's and roll down the highway in 5th, knowing I had more gear if I needed it!
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #11  
AH64ID's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,737
Likes: 4
From: Kuna, Idaho
IMO you would spend your money better on a gear vendros OD... better rpms when cruising and more gears when towing... At 75 the 3.42s only drop the rpms by 187, the gear vendors drops it 493...
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #12  
J2Waite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
I definitely agree about the gear vendors. Keep the touque offered by the current gear set and have an impressive overdrive (and extra gears) when needed.
I checked into getting one and was told it is kinda tricky with the 2wd tranny and that it would be cheaper to get a 4wd case then add the gear vendors OD.
Does that make any sense?
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #13  
DiEseLjunKy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, TN
Sounds pretty close. They put one in Greg Hogue's QC 2wd project X truck you can read about it here: http://www.dieselpowermag.com/tech/d...ive/index.html
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #14  
J2Waite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
DieselJunky, thanks for the link. They too, switched to a 4wd tranny in order to bolt the gear vendors O/D directly to the tranny.

All in all, I think I would rather keep the gear set and add the gear vendors and end up ahead all the way!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 01:29 PM
  #15  
MLB 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
The gear vendors is a great option......as long as your not planning on doing any heavy towing (see gear vendors website). I did the 3.42 Swap see mega 3.42 gears in forum. I have over 25,000 on the gears since the swap, and have pulled 90% of those miles loaded. I notice about a 200 rpm difference at 75mph and a mpg increase of 2-3 mpg.

A taller tire would accomplish the same thing, or combined with a swap make it "better".

Good Luck.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.