Towing and Hauling / RV Discuss towing and hauling here. Share your tips and tricks. RV and camping discussion welcome.

Tripple singles VS Dual tandem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 10:31 AM
  #31  
Spudder's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hvytrkmech
Actually it does.

Personal use is exempt from part 390 as spelled out in the applicability of part 390.

Quote:
f) Exceptions. Unless otherwise specifically provided, the rules in this subchapter do not apply to—

(3) The occasional transportation of personal property by individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise;


These exceptions were designed for Uhaul, Ryder, Penske, Budget, truck rentals that would otherwise require a CDL to operate but excuses the need for a CDL if rented and used by a private individual to move house hold goods from one location to another.
The section of regulation that you posted has nothing to do with needing or not needing a CDL.
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 10:48 AM
  #32  
chaikwa's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 2
From: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Originally Posted by rich
you guys aint gonna do any good with him
That works the other way around here. HE has to do good by US... and he obviously isn't going to.

Originally Posted by Spudder
The section of regulation that you posted has nothing to do with needing or not needing a CDL.
It has everything to do with CDL's as evidenced below, a direct copy and paste from the FMCSA website that YOU posted in relation to CDL's earlier in this thread;

All Regulations
Part 390

< 390.1 390.5 >

Subpart A - General applicability and definitions

§ 390.3General applicability.
(a) The rules in subchapter B of this chapter are applicable to all employers, employees, and commercial motor vehicles, which transport property or passengers in interstate commerce.
(b) The rules in part 383, Commercial Driver's License Standards; Requirements and Penalties, are applicable to every person who operates a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in §383.5 of this subchapter, in interstate or intrastate commerce and to all employers of such persons.
(And you will note that this reference is IN this chapter, which is Chapter 390)
(c) The rules in part 387, Minimum Levels of Financial Responsibility for Motor Carriers, are applicable to motor carriers as provided in § 387.3 or § 387.27 of this subchapter.
(d) Additional requirements. Nothing in subchapter B of this chapter shall be construed to prohibit an employer from requring and enforcing more stringent requirements relating to safety of operation and employee safety and health.
(e) Knowledge of and compliance with the regulations.
(1) Every employer shall be knowledgeable of and comply with all regulations contained in this subchapter which are applicable to that motor carrier's operations.
(2) Every driver and employee shall be instructed regarding, and shall comply with, all applicable regulations contained in this subchapter.
(3) All motor vehicle equipment and accessories required by this subchapter shall be maintained in compliance with all applicable performance and design criteria set forth in this subchapter.
(f) Exceptions. Unless otherwise specifically provided, the rules in this subchapter do not apply to—
(1) All school bus operations as defined in §390.5 except for the provisions of §§391.15(e) and 392.80;
(2) Transportation performed by the Federal government, a State, or any political subdivision of a State, or an agency established under a compact between States that has been approved by the Congress of the United States;
(3) The occasional transportation of personal property by individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise;
And this is the reference that includes the CDL's, IN CHAPTER 390 as referenced by the preceding 390.3 section (b) entry

So, with this information I can determine that (1) you are incapable of comprehending what you are reading, (2) you just make posts in order to incite controversy and bickering, or (3) both. I suspect the latter and we will not tolerate that here.

You sir, are finished as a DTR member and this thread is closed.

+ =
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 11:46 AM
  #33  
Hvytrkmech's Avatar
Administrator ........ DTR's puttin fires out and workin on big trucks admin
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Spudder
The section of regulation that you posted has nothing to do with needing or not needing a CDL.

Actually I copy and pasted your post

But none of that matters for you any more.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRToney
Towing and Hauling / RV
3
Jan 30, 2015 10:43 PM
CRToney
Towing and Hauling / RV
9
Mar 4, 2011 07:37 PM
Billut
Towing and Hauling / RV
30
Feb 6, 2009 10:35 AM
Igor
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
3
Oct 21, 2007 03:55 PM
Nolynn3
Towing and Hauling / RV
16
Dec 21, 2003 12:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.