Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

truck did better than I'd hoped on the dyno!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #31  
TOMTOM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: sulphur louisiana
Sweet #'s Cool video. let us know ahead of time when your dyno'in. I was in Houston sat.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2007 | 09:37 PM
  #32  
Captain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Bucks county PA
Do you think that deeper ground 100 plate gives much more power? And cant that be achived by just moveing a regular 100 plate forword more?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 01:12 AM
  #33  
roberts11260's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: North Dallas Texas
Sweet Video
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 02:09 AM
  #34  
12valve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 2
From: Mexico!
Originally Posted by Forrest Nearing
cut 3/8 off the back of the AFC foot, ground the face of the foot flat so no defuel, ditched the cupped washer on the front of the diaphragm, put the thin washer on the front and spaced it back about .080" or so, fender washer on the back. only half the nut is threaded on the shaft!

the plate is a 100 type profile, but it's ground much deeper than a regular 100 plate
ok you have modded your afc and plate just like i did.... i took a lot of pics while at it... ill try to get em up soon, if anyone wants em pm me in a few days

its funny how much more travel the afc foot needs to get fully forward, specially having the afc slightly or half way back like i want it, for low end smoke control!
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 06:36 AM
  #35  
Forrest Nearing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,800
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Captain
Do you think that deeper ground 100 plate gives much more power? And cant that be achived by just moveing a regular 100 plate forword more?
mine is moved all the way forward and yes, more fuel = more power
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 08:08 AM
  #36  
gunracer1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
From: dfw texas
Originally Posted by Forrest Nearing
mine is moved all the way forward and yes, more fuel = more power
not if you put in the longer rack plug. on my 887 pump it would hurt power and smoke like no tomorrow with all the rack that a 215 pump will do. but i have found that a 215 truck with the stock front plug will support a lot of hp.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 05:44 PM
  #37  
Captain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Bucks county PA
longer rack plug? And is there a differance between the 887 and uhh 913? I think thats the other 215 pump.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #38  
TxDiesel007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 2
From: Laredo
Perhaps they are talking about the mack plug?

Rick
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #39  
Forrest Nearing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,800
Likes: 0
yeah, he's talking about the Mack plug... Mike, you pretty much talked me out of that... I'm sticking w/ the stock plug.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #40  
12valve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 2
From: Mexico!
yep mack plug or shimmed stock plug, like on my truck... i have in cab rack travel adjustability to see how much rack travel performs bettest
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 12:20 AM
  #41  
12valve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 2
From: Mexico!
AFC mods pics
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 10:12 AM
  #42  
Captain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Bucks county PA
great pictures. I was pretty sure I knew what you guys ment but now I know. And knowing is half the battle..
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #43  
Forrest Nearing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,800
Likes: 0
here's the dyno chart of the runs:

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 12:50 AM
  #44  
Ph4tty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
From: fredericksburg, virginia
I guess run 001 is the one that slipped the clutch? I can see why with almost 1200 lbs @ around 2100! Thats a very steep torque curve on that first run too. I'm impressed. Not quite like the one below but getting close


@@ __________________
@ |
@ |
@|
@|
@|
_

Now I just want to know of the SB hits any harder
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 07:59 AM
  #45  
gunracer1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
From: dfw texas
i think the green was 6th gear and the other runs were 5th gear.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.