Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

Donaldson silent partner muffler

Old Apr 29, 2010 | 10:52 AM
  #1  
capt.Ron's Avatar
Thread Starter
I think I can... I think...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
From: Texas (DFW area)
Donaldson silent partner muffler

Has anyone ever tried on of these mufflers. I kind of like my current setup but I'm more of a "Silence is Golden" kind of guy.
I was thinking that I could keep my current muffler (move it to the rear) and put the Donaldson towards the front.
Thoughts??
I'll have to run an adapter to fit the 5" to my 4" systems.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2010 | 10:24 PM
  #2  
capt.Ron's Avatar
Thread Starter
I think I can... I think...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
From: Texas (DFW area)
No body seen or heard of these puppies??
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 04:01 PM
  #3  
diggerphd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Edmonds, Washington
Donaldson Mufflers

I too value a quiet driving experience...gives an opportune time for thought, eh?

When my stock muffler is ready for replacement, I'll be deleting the catalytic converter and going with a Donaldson muffler. The Donaldson model M090544 is a 51" x 9" muffler with a 4" inlet/outlet. Commonly used in many commercial trucks, it's available from Ryder Fleet Products for $88.14. [800] 759-6479

Good luck!

Steve
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #4  
xpetecx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: burlington wisconsin
Originally Posted by diggerphd
I too value a quiet driving experience...gives an opportune time for thought, eh?

When my stock muffler is ready for replacement, I'll be deleting the catalytic converter and going with a Donaldson muffler. The Donaldson model M090544 is a 51" x 9" muffler with a 4" inlet/outlet. Commonly used in many commercial trucks, it's available from Ryder Fleet Products for $88.14. [800] 759-6479

Good luck!

Steve
Ive got a Donaldson similar to the one you have on my first gen and I like it. its realy quiet and is really priced well. no complaints at all.

As for the silent partner I have never even heard of them but I am intrested. If you end up getting one let us know how it works.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 09:42 PM
  #5  
carl48's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 4
From: ruidoso new mexico
the 101182 is a little quiter. add a m090072 in front of it for best results.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 10:56 PM
  #6  
capt.Ron's Avatar
Thread Starter
I think I can... I think...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
From: Texas (DFW area)
Originally Posted by carl48
the 101182 is a little quiter. add a m090072 in front of it for best results.
The 101182 is one of the Silent partner mufflers.
Here are the specs on that one.
The 101181 appears to have better flow characteristics.
See the specs here.
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 01:33 AM
  #7  
diggerphd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Edmonds, Washington
Well Ron...if I had to pay the quoted $324. dollars for a Donaldson "silent partner muffler" verses the $88. dollars for one of the top selling Donaldson mufflers, I'm afraid there would be little quiet enjoyment!

I might point out that the more expensive Donaldson "silent partner muffler" you mentioned is designed more for exhaust brake applications.
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 08:15 AM
  #8  
capt.Ron's Avatar
Thread Starter
I think I can... I think...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
From: Texas (DFW area)
Originally Posted by diggerphd
Well Ron...if I had to pay the quoted $324. dollars for a Donaldson "silent partner muffler" verses the $88. dollars for one of the top selling Donaldson mufflers, I'm afraid there would be little quiet enjoyment!

I might point out that the more expensive Donaldson "silent partner muffler" you mentioned is designed more for exhaust brake applications.
Yes it is quite a bit more expensive and they do refer to exhaust brake application but it is a direct replacement for a regular muffler. If the only advantage over other mufflers is silencing the jake brake then it's certainly not for me but if it reduces the exhaust sound considerably better than others while providing maximum airflow I might be willing to spend the extra bucks.
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #9  
capt.Ron's Avatar
Thread Starter
I think I can... I think...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
From: Texas (DFW area)
Still researching here.
I found this spec sheet on Donaldson's website. It shows size, Db attenuation CFM etc.....

I'm assuming that the higher the number on attenuation the quieter the muffler at least from this info.

The following table helps to indicate the order of magnitude associated with dB:
1 dB attenuation means that 0.79 of the input power survives
3 dB attenuation means that 0.50 of the input power survives
10 dB attenuation means that 0.1 of the input power survives
20 dB attenuation means that 0.01 of the input power survives
30 dB attenuation means that 0.001 of the input power survives
40 dB attenuation means that 0.0001 of the input power survives
Anyway there are higher attenuation choices but decreased CFM levels.
So what kind of CFM levels should we look for when adding a muffler to our trucks for maximum performance? I could decide to upgrade my turbo, add injectors, 3 GSK etc... so I don't want to overly restrict things but I do want to get as much silencing characteristics as I can.
Reply
Old May 5, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #10  
capt.Ron's Avatar
Thread Starter
I think I can... I think...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 0
From: Texas (DFW area)
Here is some info that I found in another post.
To put numbers on this: The rule of thumb (per David Vizard) is that exhaust will frrely flow about 115CFM/sq in of sectional area.

Thus, 4" will flow 1445 CFM. That's a LOT of air.

4" is fine even with a somewhat small set of twins, running a reducer from 5" outlet to 4"pipe. Doesn't cost much in the way of HP or cooling at all.

IMO, you'd have to be running some rather large twins (HT4C or bigger on bottom) to even approach NEEDING 5".

5" will freely flow 2258 CFM. That's plenty to supply an ISX at 600hp 14L displacement.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CalypsoCowboy
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
2
Aug 20, 2008 07:11 PM
adamsjk
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
1
Jul 6, 2007 04:38 PM
Robman
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
13
Jan 26, 2007 07:30 PM
95ramtough
Other
22
Oct 11, 2003 08:52 AM
Redleg
Other
19
Aug 11, 2003 07:53 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.