Other Everything else not covered in the main topics goes here. Please avoid brand and flame wars. Don't try and up your post count. It won't work in here.

How good are your tranny's???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
CadMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Question How good are your tranny's???

I'm looking for a 5 speed manual transmission to use in my '67 Cadillac project car. A guy at work swears by his Dodge Ram 5-speed as bullit proof. I'll be running about 600 ft lbs and 500 bhp in a 4500 lb car.

Do you guys think a 2wd 5 speed dodge truck will live with this as a daily driver?

Appreciate the help
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 07:36 AM
  #2  
cumminsdriver635's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
From: Garrard county, Kentucky
No problem. 600ft lbs of torque is cake for an NV4500 since a lot of us are WELL over that. Quite a few making double that torque. It should be no problem if you wanted to put it in a car.

Eric
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #3  
ckt_santiago's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Menomonie, Wisconsin
Well you will have to upgrade the clutch a little, but these boys run 1000+ ft/lbs torque and 450hp pretty easy on these things as daily drivers... Some run as much as 900hp and ungodly amounts of torque with only clutch upgrades. A fifth gear update is recommended though because the nut likes to fall off and leave you with an operational four speed
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #4  
patdaly's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,372
Likes: 172
From: Streator Illinois
You are gonna HATE the shifts though.

FWIW look at a TKO600 or Viper spec T56
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #5  
CadMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Thanks for the advice guys.

Why am i going to hate the shifts? I am assuming these boxes are synchro -- am i being more niaeve than usual????

Clutch upgrade is probably a good idea, any suggestions? I was planning to use an 11" heavy duty car clutch...........

Any of you have rough dimensions of the gear box? I'm replacing a turbo 400 which are on the large side, so I hope I won't need to cut the tunnel and fab a new one.

Once again, thanks for you help and for welcoming a non-truck guy!
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:16 PM
  #6  
smoke_pedal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 157
Likes: 1
From: I've been everywhere man
long shift throws, first gear too low for a car, long clutch travel..... There are quite a few things that make a dodge diesel transmission unsuitable for a car. If you could work out the problem with shift throws with a short throw shifter, and work out something that would give you as much pressure plate force, and still have a clutch that is useable in a car, then you would still have the issue of the very low first gear that would be very tough to work around. The trans would probably be able to fit where a TH400 went, but it doesn't narrow as much at the tailstock as an auto does.

maybe you should leave the whole deal in a dodge ram, and mod the transmission, that way you can keep the cummins. the caddy might look a little funny with 6 valve covers, and injection lines sticking through the hood.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #7  
CadMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Thanks smoke pedal.

Long shift throws are not an issue, like you say a shorft shifter will take care of that.

As for first gear, how low is low? Ideally it would be around 2.8 ish. But I'm willing to accept compromises to get a manual trans that I won't easily destroy in my car.

Clutch travel could be a problem, but I work for Kenworth and am surrounded by mechanical engineers -- I'll try to tap their know how to solve that.

As for leaving the trans in a truck, yeah, I'd love a big *** truck -- but I can't justify it alongside a big *** boat of a car. I have considered putting an ISB in the Caddy though. Our Cummins rep thinks I'm crazy. I'd need to add a marine pan and remote sump and likely tilt the engine over, but we think it would go in. I've never seen a Caddy with a slant six -- especially a Cummins diesel slant six. But that's just a bit way too much money right now. I'm stuck with a 472 Caddy big block.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #8  
woodrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 770
Likes: 4
From: Skamokawa, Washington
Geno's garage has a short shift kit for the NV tranny.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:39 PM
  #9  
Box5's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 1
From: Bellingham, Wa
get a t-56, much better for a car....
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #10  
CadMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
I agree that a T56 would make more sense for a car, however the specs are below and they make me nervous....
# 400 ft·lbf torque capacity (1993 F-Body)
# 450 ft·lbf torque capacity (GM, except 1993 F-Body)
# 600 ft·lbf torque capacity (Dodge)
# 385 ft·lbf (522 N·m) (GM MM6)
# 400 ft·lbf (542 N·m) (GM M12)

The only way to handle 600 ft lbf is with a viper box, and they are way too expensive for my budget.

(specs from wikipedia)
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #11  
tx_2500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: DFW, Texas
that and a diesel stick shifts SO much differently than those set up for gassers...esp cars. you cant just bang the shifter around. from what ive experienced you truly "row" smoothly through the gears. you cant force them and get a very clean shift. that was my issue when driving friends 5 and 6 speeds... i was used to cars
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #12  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Originally Posted by CadMan

As for first gear, how low is low? Ideally it would be around 2.8 ish. But I'm willing to accept compromises to get a manual trans that I won't easily destroy in my car.
1st: 5.6:1 (Even with 2.73's out back you won't need to use it)
2nd: 3.04:1
3rd: 1.67:1
4th: direct
5th: 0.74:1

I think it will work well, that 472 will have a wide enough power band that the big ratio spreads won't be a problem. Just gear the car as tall as you can and drive it like a 4 speed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jimnod22
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
3
Aug 26, 2012 02:32 PM
Black Dog
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
26
Dec 3, 2009 08:18 PM
Tengu
Other
53
Jan 31, 2004 09:43 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.