General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.

2007 Cummins?

Old 09-03-2004, 11:48 PM
  #1  
Muted User
Thread Starter
 
djp9747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 Cummins?

Any word out on what DCX/Cummins has in plans for 2007? This engine seems to be VERY secretive. The rumors seem to be that Ford is planning a 6.4L version of the PowerStroke, possibly with twin turbo's. I've seen some numbers mentioned at 350hp and 650 ft/lb torque. I'd like to know what Cummins is crafting up over there. I wonder if they will still stay with 5.9L like they have in the previous two generations, or if they will finally go with something larger.
Old 09-04-2004, 06:59 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
rattle_rattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rising Sun, IN (out in the woods)
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think they will stay with the 5.9L but watch out for a Cummins V6 Diesel in a Japanese truck.
Old 09-04-2004, 10:17 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Jeff K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cummins has recently released updated QSB 6.7L and 4.5L diesel engines for agricultural use (AGCO uses them). Apparently these are just bored out or stroked versions of the 5.9L and 3.9L ISB engines. I am sure they will make there way into the Dodge pickup very soon. If fact, according to rumors on the allpar.com site, there already is an engine code for a 6.7L HO Cummins Turbo Diesel "ETJ". Have a look...

http://www.allpar.com/forums/lofiver...hp/t39390.html
Old 09-04-2004, 05:34 PM
  #4  
Muted User
Thread Starter
 
djp9747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mmm, 6.7L......*wipes drool from side of mouth*. Now we are talking. Wonder what the numbers (HP/Torque) will be on that version.
Old 09-04-2004, 08:32 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
4doogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: north cali
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so all you guys are talking about bigger better motors, thats all good but what are they gona do with the our por old trannys. they might need to just drop the tranny from a semi and hook it up to our trucks. dont get me wrong i like more power but how they gona get it to the ground?

chris
Old 09-04-2004, 08:53 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
zulusafari's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What will the mileage be? People upset with the 325/600 will pass out!
Old 09-05-2004, 08:18 AM
  #7  
I was banned per my own request for speaking the name Pelosi
 
Redleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bristol Michigan
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe boring out the 5.9 will lighten it up a bit. They can make up the weight difference by beefing up the tranny. If anything, maybe the truck will have a better cent of gravity.
Old 09-05-2004, 08:24 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
sherod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vine Grove Ky
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
6.7L, hmmmmmm, roadranger, airlocker, airride seat...Think I'd just have to upgrade the old 98. Wonder if I need to get on the list now?

Ahhh dreams

Ed
Old 09-05-2004, 01:29 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
jkitterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pure speculation here. I wouldn't mind seeing two engines offered. One for power and one for fuel economy. The economy model would be for people who don't need the towing power. I am thinking sort of like the Sprinter vans. They have similar GVWR compared to 3/4 ton and heavy 3/4 ton truck, are said to get up to 25mpg. This may be because of there low weight though, about 4500 curb.
Old 09-05-2004, 02:10 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
signature600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Jeffersonville, Ohio
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think th 6.7L is an option, it has a fully structural block, meaning heavy! And this structural block is also not suited as well to a vehicle, It's just bigger.

I think it is a farther step backwards, at least at 150hp like we have in our new AGCO Tractors, Rotary Pump, not the Good ol' P-7100. Not that it's not good, but just not better.

It is still a good engine, we've got 4 out right now, and not a single engine problem yet (which is good, because Cummins in our area Stinks, and we aren't allowed to work on these engines.)

Chris
Old 09-06-2004, 12:30 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
mattymac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: sutter CA
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You cant stroke a 5.9 because of the piston to valve/head clearances. at least not to a 6.7L or not without alot of other modifications.
Old 09-06-2004, 09:06 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
JyRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pike Road, Alabama
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking vicious cycle...

I think we should just buy class 8 rigs and make them our daily drivers and tow our jet-skis with them. What's the biggest engine we can get in a class 8? Then we take that engine, bomb it. And then we can talk about when they're going to come out with a bigger and more powerful engines ... because the current ones just don't quite get the job done any more. We can even discuss when the sleepers will get bigger, because hey, we've just had a 2nd kid! Its a never ending process!
Old 09-06-2004, 05:12 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
tankeryanker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Myrtle Creek Oregon
Posts: 944
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 4doogie
so all you guys are talking about bigger better motors, thats all good but what are they gona do with the our por old trannys. they might need to just drop the tranny from a semi and hook it up to our trucks. dont get me wrong i like more power but how they gona get it to the ground?

chris
Want to know what the next tranny will be to handle the added hp & torque.
Check out this thread.http://www.turbodieselregister.com/f...d.php?t=110818
Old 09-06-2004, 08:51 PM
  #14  
Administrator
 
jrs_dodge_diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 4,569
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts
Re: vicious cycle...

Originally posted by JyRO
I think we should just buy class 8 rigs and make them our daily drivers and tow our jet-skis with them. What's the biggest engine we can get in a class 8? Then we take that engine, bomb it. And then we can talk about when they're going to come out with a bigger and more powerful engines ... because the current ones just don't quite get the job done any more. We can even discuss when the sleepers will get bigger, because hey, we've just had a 2nd kid! Its a never ending process!
I believe the biggest you can get now is the Cummins ISX 15L.
Old 09-07-2004, 12:53 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
turboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ok
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My dealer says you'll be able to choose between a Cummins or Mercedes engine. Don't know how true it is.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fronty Owner
Other
187
11-17-2007 12:44 PM
burners_banshee
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
3
09-10-2007 02:03 PM
ID2500Ram
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
8
04-29-2007 11:31 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2007 Cummins?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.