General Diesel Discussion Talk about general diesel engines (theory, etc.) If it's about diesel, and it doesn't fit anywhere else, then put it right in here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Best year for used CTD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 05:01 AM
  #1  
ROOSTER108BM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: alabama
Question Best year for used CTD

A good friend of mine at work wants to buy a used CTD for around $10,000.
Which year models are the best regarding fuel mileage and reliability? Also which models have problems such as lift pumps and dowel pins?

Thanks Rooster
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 05:14 AM
  #2  
2500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
97 12v seems to have most votes as the best year. last year of 12v before going to four door ext cab. all the bugs were worked out. last year of non 53 block.

98 was a transition year and had 12v to mid year. some say 98 12v 4x 5sp ext cab, long bed, non 53 block is the most desirable model of all.

98.5 to 2002 (24valve) has lift pump/VP44 electronic injection pump issues. some are going trouble free, some are having multiple lift-pump failures. this could lead to VP44 failure and set you back several thousand $$.

12v motors seems to get the nod as way more durable. but loads of folks have driven 500k+ trouble free miles with 24v.

general weakness of all CTD seems to be transmissions holding up to cummins. loads of vendors offering beefed up torque converters, valve bodies etc.

12v models has the KDP or diller dowel pin issue. this can be fixed fairly easily (depending upon your wrenching skills)

do a search... there's been several threads on this same topic
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 10:34 AM
  #3  
Blast Chamber's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Well said, 2500! A 12-valve 2nd gen is the best choice in his price range. If he needs to actually use the back seat for passengers I'd look for the early '98 QC. However, if it's just the driver using the truck then a '97 would be easier to find.

If his budget was upwards of $25k, I would have suggested a late-'03 or early-'04 3rd gen for better creature comforts.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #4  
Scramblinman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, WA
Originally Posted by Blast Chamber
If he needs to actually use the back seat for passengers I'd look for the early '98 QC.
I used to subscribe to that logic until I spent a week with hunting guide who had a Club Cab CTD and found I had no issues getting in and out. The Quad Cab doors offer a minor bit of convenience and ease of access to the back seat, but I think it tends to be greatly exagerrated. I have no problems entering, exiting, or accessing items in the rear seat of the Club Cab I have bought since that hunting trip years ago. None of my kids have any problems, either. Even my 3yo just climbs in, get in her seat, and buckles herself up. About the only time I could see a Quad Cab being truly beneficial is if using a rear facing infant seat or maybe if someone is morbidly obese of something. In all honesty, if back seat access is that critical, you would be far better off just biting the bullet and moving up to a 3rd Gen QC with real back doors.

When I first considered a CTD I went along with the herd mentality that a 98 12v and Quad Cab combo would be ideal. But after actually riding in a Club Cab and then subsequently reading about how the 98 12valve trucks have issues unique to the half year model, I no longer considered them worth the premium they tend to command and expanded my search to include any 2nd Gen 12v extended length cab. And don't get me wrong, I would still take a 98 QC 12v at a price competitive with with other 2nd Gen 12v extended length cab trucks, but no way would I pay what I see most of them priced for. At least in my region, it is extremely unlikely to find a clean 98 for $10,000.

I would say that overall, the 97 is the best year as well. They have the more powerful IPs, hydroboost brakes, and are the most likely 2nd Gen 12v trucks to have various bugs worked out.

That having been said, I don't think that any of 2nd Gen 12v trucks are bad trucks. Some might need few more tweaks than others, but they are all decent trucks. I would focus more of the condition of the truck itself than a given year. I'd rather have a clean, low mileage 95 than a ragged out 97 or 98. I just happened to find a clean 97 at a great price.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #5  
Blast Chamber's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Scramblinman
When I first considered a CTD I went along with the herd mentality that a 98 12v and Quad Cab combo would be ideal. But after actually riding in a Club Cab and then subsequently reading about how the 98 12valve trucks have issues unique to the half year model, I no longer considered them worth the premium they tend to command and expanded my search to include any 2nd Gen 12v extended length cab.
I guess I'm part of the "herd" then. I looked at club cabs and they just didn't meet my needs.

Care to elaborate about the 98 12valve trucks have issues unique to the half year model?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 01:06 PM
  #6  
Scramblinman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, WA
Originally Posted by Blast Chamber
I guess I'm part of the "herd" then. I looked at club cabs and they just didn't meet my needs.
Out of curiosity, what would those needs be? I just can't imagine a QC being much more beneficial than a CC. My brother has an 01 QC, and the difference in acessibility between it and my CC seems so small it's barely worth mentioning.

Care to elaborate about the 98 12valve trucks have issues unique to the half year model?
Here is the thread that really swayed me. Some unbiased feedback from a couple of 98 owners and a diesel tech at a very well resepected diesel performance shop.

http://www.nwbombers.com/forum/index...opic=25746&hl=

Anyway, once again, (shorter version now) the '98 12-valve engine is a bit of an odd duck since it's built out of a 24-valve block, but drilled with SAE threads (versus Metric for all 24-valves) and some parts like main bearing cap bolts aren't the same length as 97-older 12-valves. And Evan (or someone) told me the '98s had more problematic P-pumps than the other years.

That being said I'm happy with my '98 12-valve, except for the lift pump was shot at 145K (I know, life is rough!) and my towing fuel economy STINKS (only a pitiful 10.8 with a 17-foot camper at moderate speeds??).
As for your analogy of half-year vehicles ending a vehicle generation (at least to a degree), the '98 12V did have problems. Many of the P-pumps crapped out prematurely, many of them not going even as long as many of the early VP44s! The intercoolers were not cast or the halves joined correctly at the inlet and outlet ports leading to substantial air leaks. Additionally, casting flashing wasn't properly removed from the inlet and outlet ports of the intercooler leading to additional air leaks. If a pressure test was administered to a '98 12V it usually had quite a few leaks throughout the entire length of the intake tract (turbo to head). BTW, Chuck Arnold of The PowerShop wrote a monthly column on this some years back in the "Nuts & Bolts" column of the RV periodical he writes for. In respect to the 12V engine, '97 was definitely the better year! The lure of the '98 12V is due to the Quad Cab and interior redesign aspects of the '98 model year truck...the 12V was just along for the ride so-to-speak.

So, not all was hunky-dory in '98 with the 12V engines.
I agree. The 98 12-valve is BY FAR the most troublesome of the 12V trucks. They have a ton of weird problems, too many to list here.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #7  
Blast Chamber's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Scramblinman
Out of curiosity, what would those needs be? I just can't imagine a QC being much more beneficial than a CC.
Everyone's needs are different, so maybe that's why they make different cab configurations. In my case, in addition to finding that the QC is easier to get my two kids in and out of, I also haul a 40# bag of hand tools for work and find it's much easier to get out of the back of a QC. Plus, I used to own a 1st gen club cab and didn't like access to the back of that. Just my opinion.

As for the problems you listed with '98 12-valves, I'll take my chances.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 01:37 PM
  #8  
Scramblinman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, WA
Originally Posted by Blast Chamber
Everyone's needs are different, so maybe that's why they make different cab configurations. In my case, in addition to finding that the QC is easier to get my two kids in and out of, I also haul a 40# bag of hand tools for work and find it's much easier to get out of the back of a QC. Plus, I used to own a 1st gen club cab and didn't like access to the back of that. Just my opinion.
Fair enough. I also have 2 kids left at home and haul a fairly large, heavy work bag with all my railroad gear in it as well and have no issue with the CC. To each their own.

I can agree that the QC does offer a minor improvement, I just find if difficult to justify for anywhere near the typical price difference between an otherwise similar 97 CC, especially when the 98 comes with potential additional issues.

I would have gone straight to a 3rd Gen had I needed anything more. To me the physical size of the cab is the limiting factor, not a lack of small suicide doors.

As for the problems you listed with '98 12-valves, I'll take my chances.
As do we all. Just presenting some open, unbiased discussion about the subject for someone considering a 2nd Gen 12v.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #9  
2500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
holy cow!!! had no idea 98 12v had all those gremblins...

sure glad I ended up with a 97. been keeping an eye open for a low mileage 98 12v 5sp, but not anymore.

keeping mine 97!!!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2007 | 07:59 PM
  #10  
C Schomer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 1
From: Pueblo West
I had a VERY clean and perfectly straight 97 5sp 3/4T and sold it last summer for $10k. I fixed the kdp and 5th gear and then it was bulletproof - I loved that truck! It also had a stronger, quieter body than my 03. 01.5 was the first 4w disc brakes. I know of several 00-02 24v's that still have the stock injection pump and some with the stock lift pump. Craig
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
horsinaround
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
4
Apr 14, 2012 06:35 PM
53 willys
General Diesel Discussion
31
Feb 19, 2007 09:40 AM
trophystock
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
4
Jul 16, 2006 11:00 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.