2011 Denali HD
Well it looks like 397 hp and 765 ft-lbs of torque! I'd say it'll cost a pretty penny!
http://www.gmc.com/2011sierra/denali/gallery.jsp and press release http://www.gmc.com/pdf/11_GMC_Sierra...elease_3_8.pdf |
Crazy numbers, just a minute ago I read it on pickuptruck.com.
I wonder what Cummins will pull out of their pockets for the next 6.7, heard rumours that the next gen Cummins 6.7 offers twin turbos and no emission equipment due to optimized combustion. But thatīs just rumours, anyone knows more? |
Originally Posted by Northern Light
(Post 2722219)
Crazy numbers, just a minute ago I read it on pickuptruck.com.
I wonder what Cummins will pull out of their pockets for the next 6.7, heard rumours that the next gen Cummins 6.7 offers twin turbos and no emission equipment due to optimized combustion. But thatīs just rumours, anyone knows more? |
I'd be happier with a bullet proof transmission from chrysler that could last than 397hp stock. Who really needs that much power every day? Kinda goes back to the numbers that the new 6.7 ford engine is pushing. Give the public a engine that gets +25mpg, can be worked on by the average mechanic, and has a great warranty and it'll sell like irish beer on St. Pattys day.
mmmm, beeeeeeer, *drool* |
passalacqua, thx for the link ;)
purduepurdy, 25+ miles/gallon would be nice. Maybe in the future if Dodge starts to offer another diesel option (a twin turbo inline 6 would be great!). Oh, and speaking of beer, mine tastes good :D |
It's the horsepower wars, GM still stuck in the 60's. Truck still ugly as a hat full of as.......whoa nelly.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands