LEAKY SEALS & ULSD (Chevron Products Company Tech Bulletin)

BREIF INTRO...
Some vehicle owners, who recently began using the new EPA regulated ultra low sulfur (S15) diesel fuel, report that their vehicles have developed fuel leaks. This problem is not exclusive to one engine type, one fuel type, or one geographic region. It can affect some engines that are older than ten years, but some newer ones have experienced the problem as well. The reoccurrence of these fuel leaks could become widespread geographically when the majority of fuel supplies are switched to S15. However, it is "anticipated" that only a very small fraction of the vehicles may be affected. Of course it can be serious for owners whose vehicles are affected. The evidence to date suggests the problem is linked to a change in the aromatics content of the S15 ultra low sulfur diesel fuel, to [O-RING] seal material and age of the material.

HINDESIGHT'S 20/20
Similar occurrences were reported in the early 1990’s when low sulfur fuel (S500) was introduced. The leaks in the 1990’s occurred at points where elastomers (O-rings) are used to seal joints in the fuel system. In October 1993, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments required diesel fuel for “on highway” vehicles contain no more than 0.05 percent sulfur by weight. Before this, diesel fuel typically contained 0.2 to 0.4 percent sulfur by weight. Reports of fuel system seal leaks surfaced shortly after the introduction of the then new fuel designated as S500. Affected components were mostly fuel pumps and injectors. During the 1993-94 period, the most common occurrences were injector fuel pump leaks. (Elastomer O-RING failures in the 1990’s were addressed by a California Governor’s Task Force. For an online copy go to: ftp://ftp.arb.ca.gov/carbis/reports/l63 9.pdf)

HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF
Starting June 2006, refineries will be required to produce diesel fuel with a much lower sulfur level (15 ppm) than was contained in S500 (500 ppm). The new fuel is commonly known as ULTRA LOW SULFUR FUEL designated as S15 by the ASTM standard D 975. As noted earlier in some areas where this new S15 fuel has been introduced ahead of schedule, some occurrences of similar fuel leaks have been reported. Should further elastomer (O-RING) failures occur, they are expected to be sporadic. Seals in some vehicles may fail while similar seals in other vehicles using the same fuel may not. Past experience indicates that the common denominator is expected to be nitrile rubber (Buna N) seals that have seen long service at high temperatures. High temperatures have a tendency to accelerate seal aging. The reduction in sulfur content is not responsible for the problem.

Two explanations have been offered to explain the sudden occurrence of seal failures:

1) The new S15 fuels are expected to contain lower levels of aromatics. The change from a higher to a lower aromatics fuel can cause seals to shrink. Aged seals, which do not have the elasticity to adapt to this change, appear to fail sooner.

2) Some of the new S15 fuels are expected to be more susceptible to oxidation. The resulting oxidation products (peroxides) could attack the seal material and cause it to prematurely age.

RECOMENDATIONS
Fuel additives do not appear to be a solution, since they do not change the aromatics content of the fuel. The seal failure is not related to fuel lubricity. Lubricity affects wear of metal parts. There is no relationship between the fuel lubricity level and elastomer [O-RING] failures. Currently all fuels in the U.S. must meet a minimum lubricity level.

If you have a diesel fuel system that is leaking, Chevron recommends that you contact your equipment manufacturer for advice on the choice of a replacement elastomer for the seals and future maintenance schedule. Newly replaced seals should not develop a leak.If you have not experienced this problem, you still may wish to consult your equipment manufacturer about a maintenance schedule for your aged nitrile rubber (Buna N) seals and manufacturer’s experience with lower aromatics (ULSD) diesel.

[Another Recommendation] "add at least some (depends on how much you are comfortable adding) BioDiesel to your diesel tank at every fill up to keep those seals nice & plump since BioDiesel does contains aromatics which swell older types of O-rings."

 

Wow, this is very interesting. Thank you for this piece of information.

 

Another way for them to take the older diesels off the road quicker...

 

I still use the LSD it can be found, mostly at truck stops. Travel America's web site post the type of fuel available.

 

Other than VERY poor mileage as compared to LSD and not quite the "umph" of LSD...I haven't experienced anything negative on the ULSD side...YET.

 

one percent less mileage

 

I buy the 80/20 bio anytime I am up in Nashville and pass the station that sells it. Other than that no problems out of the ULSD since I started using it, knock on wood.....

 

Ya, I got a rash from the new Diesel, Working on lift pump,
Right arm red and itchy,,,,
Never had a problem when throughly immersed in the old diesel....

Oh, VP44 died 4 months after a steady diet of new Diesel, coincidence ????

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by dodgeguy71

I buy the 80/20 bio

What's price per gallon on that 80/20 bio?

 

According to this statement (I don't know where you got this "one percent less" number at however) if I am averaging 20mpg with LSD, I should be averaing 19.8mpg with ULSD...that is hardly the case. Before going on deployment, my wife and I made a trip to VA, WV and back to San Diego...put about 7000 miles on the truck during the trip (truck now has almost 30k on her)...EVERY tank of LSD that I got, I averaged about 19 at the worst and 21 at the best hand calculated at 68mph, 2000 RPMs with 4.10 gears...with ULSD, I averaged about 15 at worst 17.5 at best hand calculated at the same speeds...that is MUCH more significant than 1 percent.

P.S. Every fill up was at a Flying J in the big rig pumps which is known to have clean diesel and I was running Power Service at every tank as well.

 

My truck runs the same with ULSD. Fuel mileage is still the same as well.

 

The only problem I'm having is an reduction in my disposable income and a increase in my blood pressure from the fuel prices.

 

Survey of the nation's largest trucking firms published by Diesel Progress Magazine a few months back indicated very few problems with ULSD.
Average decrease in mpgs was less than 1%.

Personally I've seen no difference between LSD and ULSD