Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices Use this forum to discuss your biodiesel information, and to find the best price on fuel.

Biodiesel vs Veg conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #1  
Slugblaster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: West Hills CA
Biodiesel vs Veg conversion

What are the opinions on whats best and most cost effective. Home brewing biodiesel or installing a conversion kit and running used cooking oil?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #2  
annabelle's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 2
From: NM
I'd say Bio is the way to go.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 12:10 AM
  #3  
stinkindiesel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
With 5 years of production and 6000+ gallons made, my vote is biodiesel.

Big reasons: no need for an extra tank, no excessive filtering of cold, thick oil, bio blends with D2 in any ratio so there's no danger of being caught away from home low on fuel, and it produces no coking even if combustion temps are low.

Dewatering and filtering WVO is as messy as (or messier than) processing bio, and I've NEVER seen a WVO car that wasn't wearing the evidence of its fuel somewhere in the form of sticky, congealed veggie oil. Lastly, there is no complicated two-tank system with its engine coolant heated fuel lines and filter system and failure prone switching valves.

I live happily with bio's down side of needing to buy methanol, play with dangerous lye, and mix it all up while trying to avoid breathing the fumes.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #4  
dkenny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 2
would like an X3 answer...yep I'd go with biodiesel.

if you convert the truck..what will you do the next one?
with biodiesel you convert the fuel..well made it should run in any diesel.

-dkenny
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #5  
Diesel Dave2's Avatar
Pickin on the wrong admin...
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,568
Likes: 1
I'm for the Bio-diesel also...
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 07:55 AM
  #6  
John Faughn's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 1
From: St Paul , MN.
I've spent the last 4+ yrs. looking into this , and would never consider the veg. conv. , even though there are many that have used the veg. conv. , there is lots of data showing many issue's with its use as a fuel .
I would rather spend the money on what is left at home [ processor + what ever issues ] than have the conversion equipment on the truck + the issue's on the road with me .
Its hard to put together a inexpensive conversion on truck , as compared to build a processor at home for less money .
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 02:24 PM
  #7  
buzzinhalfdoz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: east tn
i have been running 20-40% wvo in a 3rd gen for over 50,000 miles now with no issues. the reason i chose this route is that with bio u have to process it then u have to get rid of has chems. with my setup u just filter the wvo and pour it in. 30degrees to 45- 20%, above 45 20=30% and when the temps hit 70 and above i have run as high as 40-45% with no trouble.this is easy and lowers my fuel cost 20-40%. i drive a lot though and maby this would not be good for someone who did not reach 190-200degrees engine temp most of the time. just my .02 worth... i do cut my wvo with 3-5% rug or kero. and use power service...
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 3, 2009 | 09:14 PM
  #8  
kawi600's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 1
From: Boston, mASS
there are pros and cons to both approaches
The veg conversion means you dont need much more than the conversion itself and the equipment to filter and de-water the oil. You dont need to keep buying chemicals or use lots of electricity. Downside is you have to use this on a hot engine, a long trip and during the warm weather. You risk damage otherwise. The risk is greater when you use it on electronic pumps like the VP44 or higher pressure setups like the cp3. Risk may be greater on heavily-fueled trucks. Theres not much info that I can find on this though.
biodiesel can be used for short trips. It can pour right into the tank. It needs to be processed with chemicals. Needs washing, drying and filtering. youre left with a waste product to dispose of which may or may not be benign if dumped. might be a possibility of problems on high pressure systems.
Most of the horror stories you hear on both fuels are due to poor processing, filtering and drying. Water eats injector tips and pumps. Soaps that settle out of bad fuel will clog filters. long-term incomplete burn of veggie oil on a cold motor can cause ring coking and fuel washdown into the crankcase.
Do your homework and figure out which is best for you
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #9  
macattack_ga's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
WVO here.
But, I drive the truck on longer trips so 2nd tank and the range it affords is a good thing. Also, heating the fuel and purging is not much of an issue on longer trips. With my system, I can cut off the heat and fill the 2nd tank with Dino or BioD.

How will you use the truck?
Shorter trips = BioD
Longer trips = WVO

My $0.02
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 06:56 AM
  #10  
Mark Hodowanec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by macattack_ga
WVO here.
How will you use the truck?
Shorter trips = BioD
Longer trips = WVO
I think you have said it best!
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 04:26 PM
  #11  
lifesamountain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
I have been making my own B100 for truck and wife's Jetta for 4 years and STILL can't decide if I want to convert one or both vehicles. Let's say that a setup for WVO in the rig costs about the same as a make-your-own processor. Now we are down to production costs. My estimate is ~$1 a gallon for time and money to get the oil down at the greasy-spoon restaurant and another $1 per gallon to turn it into B100. Say $2000 for a setup either way. I'd have to drive the truck 30000 miles to break even. Whereas I could sell it tomorrow and put B100 in the new ride. So far, no WVO for me, but I am constantly thinking of how to make B100 faster and easier!
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2012 | 01:12 PM
  #12  
Scott Rotten's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Hey guys, I'm running a 97 3500 flat bed, and I'm setting up for making wvo. I have an external 35 gallon steel tank, and 2 55 drums for filtering my wvo. I will be using 2 deisel oil filters as my filtering media, and have to figure out how to get rid of the water efficiently. I would appreciate any links to wvo equipment, and also any bio D sites that you guys have used and TRUST. Thanks. Scott R.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 11:14 PM
  #13  
dieselluvr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 172
Likes: 6
From: The Dalles, OR.
Definately WVO. Once converted it's so much faster to process fuel. You can convert a truck easily for about $1500 or less. You don't loose any performance or fuel economy like you will with B100. Here's a recommended diagram for you:
Name:  WVODiagram-1.jpg
Views: 1016
Size:  49.7 KB
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigragu
Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices
9
Aug 6, 2006 05:42 PM
tyssniffen
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
28
Mar 28, 2006 07:38 PM
jay05torque
Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices
16
Nov 18, 2005 09:40 AM
Mixer Man
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
5
Oct 8, 2005 12:02 AM
JoeDiesel
Other
2
Mar 18, 2003 06:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.