4500 / 5500 - Chassis Cab Trucks Talk about your commercial trucks here. We realize there are differences with these compared to the regular pickups, so we have provided a place to discuss the commercial versions only.

4500 More Suited for Hotshot Work Over 1-Ton?

Old 06-24-2008, 03:44 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Truck30Haul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4500 More Suited for Hotshot Work Over 1-Ton?

This is a question I have mostly right now for research purposes. A guy I was talking to today was telling me that whenever I can to get a 4500 series truck since it has better hauling capability than the 1-ton 3500's for hotshot work.

I have read a little so far about these trucks and was wondering, since these are cab chassis based trucks, would it be possible to add a GN hitch onto these? And how would the pulling power be improved with these type trucks? If it came to the point where I wanted to do that in the future, I could simply put aside cash now for one. But I wanted to learn more about them before deciding to look into them. Any thoughts?
Old 06-24-2008, 07:56 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kerrville eastern new mexico, west texas
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
believe they have same drivetrain just can haul more weight and maybe bigger brakes. i would say gn is a yes but i believe you will only be able to run it with a flatbed
Old 06-24-2008, 05:17 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
haulin-rv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What kind of hot shot work?? The 4500 and 5500 can carry more weight on the chassis, but the gcwr is not much more than a 3500. Its only 26k. My opinion would be a 3500 cab chassis put a real sleeper on since the dot is cracking down on having a legal place to sleep, and a flat bed.
Old 06-24-2008, 09:37 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Truck30Haul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by haulin-rv
What kind of hot shot work?? The 4500 and 5500 can carry more weight on the chassis, but the gcwr is not much more than a 3500. Its only 26k. My opinion would be a 3500 cab chassis put a real sleeper on since the dot is cracking down on having a legal place to sleep, and a flat bed.
3500 Chassis eh? Sounds like a good idea since the 4500 and 5500 are more expensive. I wonder what kind of sleepers can be installed on such a chassis? What about flat beds, where would you get one from?
Old 06-24-2008, 09:57 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
skirsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hot shot with a 4500 and I can see all the 3500 driving faster than me. I also know that the 3500 the can pull 16000kg but after 3yrs the are a big buch of problems.... My truck I drive with very low rpm and keep pushing and pushing. I thing I could use it for more 500.000km with no big problems
Old 06-24-2008, 10:24 PM
  #6  
With age comes the cage
 
Colo_River_Ram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Gas Patch
Posts: 2,710
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Just why do you think they made the 4500 and 5500's ?? The thing that impressed me the most about my Sterling 5500 was the frame rail material 3/8" thick.

max speed is set at 75, with my 6 spd auto and 4.88 gears i'm turning 2500 rpm at 75 mph.. I am going to mount a hydraulic pump to the PTO on the tranny to run my winches / air compressors / welder, as engine mount kits are only rated to 10 HP..

As for GN hookups B&W does a flat bed mount ( you weld it right to your bed) I am about done with the bed when it is finished I will post some pics..
Old 06-25-2008, 10:08 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
brazos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please check you "Private Messages" as I have sent you some information there that in your case might clear up some questions.

$.02 - Long run I think you will be happier, safer, and have more options with a 4500 or 5500 series over a One ton.

braz
Old 06-25-2008, 01:44 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Cummins610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go with the 4500 with an auto. My 5500 just beats you to death and the 4500 is just right.
Old 06-25-2008, 06:11 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
floridagc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Plantation, Florida
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with 610 comment, I think the 4500 is a much better ride, I am at 13,600 on the scale with the utility boxes, welder and compressor. I also tow a 31 foot enclosed, I need to keep looking back to make sure the trailer is still there.

flgc
Old 06-26-2008, 05:39 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
johnjudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ridgefield, CT
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.turnoverball.com/custom.asp#
Old 06-27-2008, 05:37 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Jim Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lake Placid FL USA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are going with the 3500, the manual with 3.73 will put you at 63@2000rpm and 75@2400rpm only 100rpm less than the 4.88 auto 4500/5500. The only powertrain difference in a 2500/3500 MANUAL trans is the rearend. I tow at 60, so I'm not putting much power though mine either. The big differnce is deadhead miles- at 60mph you can get 25mpg in a 2wd 6sp manual 2500 vs 19mpg on a 3500 2wd dually manual. I would imagine that 4wd auto 4500/5500 would be even worse at 60mph- 16-18mpg?

Its hard to gauge with only 700 towing miles so far on my cab chassis, but from past trips with equal trailers the truck does not seem to effect mileage. I guess rolling resistance and frontal are what matter most when pulling a trailer. If you hotshot and always have a GN behind, mileage probably won't be an issue.
Old 06-27-2008, 07:15 PM
  #12  
With age comes the cage
 
Colo_River_Ram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Gas Patch
Posts: 2,710
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by johnjudge
Here is some Pics of the first bed B&W made for the 4500/5500 's:



Old 06-29-2008, 10:09 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Barry Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cookeville, Tn
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rich
believe they have same drivetrain just can haul more weight and maybe bigger brakes. i would say gn is a yes but i believe you will only be able to run it with a flatbed
I'm pretty sure the 4500 has the 110 Dana and "Super 60" front axle.
Old 07-10-2008, 07:14 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Jim Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lake Placid FL USA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Colo_River_Ram;2127388]The thing that impressed me the most about my Sterling 5500 was the frame rail material 3/8" thick. [QUOTE]
I've seen class 8 trucks with 1/4" frames. Are you sure the frame is 3/8" thick on the 5500? I know my 3500 is 3/16" and figured the 4500/5500 were the same, just a bigger c section. The rear axle of the 3500 cab chassis says 9350lb on the door. That is higher than the GVWR of the 2500(9000lb) I had. Even if you were way overloaded with a 30K GN and 6000lbs on the ball, you would be right under the rear axle rating for a 3500.
Old 08-10-2008, 11:19 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
rfeiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Jose, CA / Reno, NV
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 26,000 combined weight of truck,cargo, and trailer is the limit set by the DOT so a class C license'd driver can use the 4500 and 5500 in states like CA if it is rated over 26,200 you need a class B or class A license. class B license in CA can only tow over 10,000lb if the use is for agriculture or RV as far as I understand. the truck is certainly capable of towing more. but be careful if you tow a utiltiy trailer over 10,000lbs.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 4500 More Suited for Hotshot Work Over 1-Ton?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.