3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

Twin turbo's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 12:48 PM
  #1  
J-man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Western Colorado
Twin turbo's

I've seen a few guys on here saying that they are getting 5-7 mpg gains with twins. If twins cost around $3,000, they would pay themselves off in just over a year. (quick figuring and maybe not accurate) How many are running twins and can you verify these gains?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:00 PM
  #2  
06CTDforAU's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
I've never heard of the kind of mileage gain by just adding twins. I'm gonna say that those are inaccurate numbers. If they are correct, sign me up!
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #3  
J-man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Western Colorado
That's kinda what I thought, but I just have my stocker, and I want to hear from those that do have twins to see what they say.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #4  
WUnderwood's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
there is NO way that is accurate
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:07 PM
  #5  
Torks03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 06CTDforAU
I've never heard of the kind of mileage gain by just adding twins. I'm gonna say that those are inaccurate numbers. If they are correct, sign me up!
Serious...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #6  
jaredb900rr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Draper, UT
I'm gonna say that is innacurate. I could see maybe 1-2 mpg increase if you can keep your foot out of it, but I would bet it would be just about the same. My mileage has definitely gone down cuz now it's just way too much fun to drive...not to mention that turbo whistle is music to my ears!
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #7  
Jfaulkner's Avatar
Muted User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jaredb900rr
I'm gonna say that is innacurate. I could see maybe 1-2 mpg increase if you can keep your foot out of it, but I would bet it would be just about the same. My mileage has definitely gone down cuz now it's just way too much fun to drive...not to mention that turbo whistle is music to my ears!
X2, no way my mileage increased.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:47 PM
  #8  
RowJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,234
Likes: 1
From: Texas/Oklahoma Border
No increase in mileage here.... on my 02. Just more boosted air for a heavily fueled truck.

I daily drive mine at around 425 hp. Often go a full tank without increasing hp. No gain there either.

RJ
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #9  
DiEseLjunKy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, TN
I remember myself in one thread mentioning pretty nominal but decent gains with my mods and some dude claimed an easy 5-7 mpg gain with twins. Riiiiiight.. but I didn't say nothin
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #10  
enafzige's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
I've not seen any hard data indicating that twins offer a large gain in MPG numbers over the stock turbo.

I think the MPG gain comes from having a large, slow-spooling single, and then transitioning to twins. But even then, the increase is usually 1 - 1.5 MPG.

--Eric
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #11  
cquestad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,540
Likes: 0
From: Boise, Idaho
no gain...more like loss unless you are overfueled.

it takes energy to spin turbo number 2...nothing is free in the world of thermo dynamics...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #12  
soulezoo's Avatar
DTR 1st Sergeant
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,530
Likes: 6
From: Applegate, CA
What he said above...

I saw no change at all in MPG, better or worse, with mine.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 03:18 PM
  #13  
dodgezilla04's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
From: kingston,wa
mine got slightly worse, cause i cannot resist hearing the different tones of the two of them
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #14  
soulezoo's Avatar
DTR 1st Sergeant
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,530
Likes: 6
From: Applegate, CA
Originally Posted by dodgezilla04
mine got slightly worse, cause i cannot resist hearing the different tones of the two of them
Yeah... and you have "special" twins too..
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #15  
J-man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Western Colorado
No mpg's, but lot's of power I bet!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.