Stock Turbo w/ Basic Mods vs. BD Super B Single Turbo

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 12, 2007 | 07:40 AM

#16

PourinDiesel

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 5,352

Likes: 0

From: Southern, Indiana

Last time I measured the super b was 58mm at the inducer on the compressor side.

Feb 12, 2007 | 08:02 AM

#17

ptgarcia

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 5,777

Likes: 0

From: Alta Loma, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lark

If you could see the "whole" picture, you'd understand.

No need to see the whole picture, you just need to read between the cheeks...........uhhh...I mean, lines.

Feb 12, 2007 | 05:14 PM

#18

stock03

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 1,007

Likes: 0

From: Albuquerque, NM

The SuperB spools a little slower than stock. It was pretty easy to install too. I bought it because it was cheaper than a stock turbo.

If I had to do it all over again...I would probably still buy it...I want to upgrade to twins and I think I'm 1/2 way there!

I paid $1,090.00 for mine.

Feb 12, 2007 | 06:34 PM

#19

Lark

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 444

Likes: 0

From: Krum, TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by stock03

Spools "slower" than stock?

I've been told by two different performance shops that it spools faster AND produces more power on the top end over stock. Something about the way the blades are designed and just a better setup.

Can you feel a $1,090 difference after you had it installed? I'd love to hear your impressions!

I'm really leaning towards the dual turbo setup as well.