Dodge Diesel - Diesel Truck Resource Forums

Dodge Diesel - Diesel Truck Resource Forums (https://www.dieseltruckresource.com/forums/)

- 3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) (https://www.dieseltruckresource.com/forums/3rd-gen-high-performance-accessories-5-9l-only-107/)

- - GDP Intake Horn Tested! (https://www.dieseltruckresource.com/forums/3rd-gen-high-performance-accessories-5-9l-only-107/gdp-intake-horn-tested-189748/)

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmccart (Post 1919854)

Does the CFM or GDP come with the 2 new gaskets for the heater delete?

Thanx.

CFM comes with two gaskets.

Both come with gaskets. Cool.
Thanx.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erik@TVP (Post 1919868)

If we cut irregularities, the manifold averaged 20-25HP and 45-65 HP from 1800-2300. They are pretty close from 2300-3000, then the gains are 13-20hp and 25-32tq.

Hey Erik, are you comparing the CFM & Glacier on that?

Thanx.

My foot never slipped off the pedal. I think the dips may be from when Erik was applying the load. just a guess.

Quote:

Originally Posted by realsquash (Post 1919862)

If the manifold really smoothed out that dip under 2000 rpm, that is truly a great thing, but what I'm reading here casts doubt on that. I've seen that dip in many a chart, but now I read that someone's foot slipped off the throttle during a run, and then that there were 3 runs, one that shows even more confusing results. Of course the run where the foot slipped also shows the best gains, and it would seem to me that the dyno operator would make another run if his foot slipped off. Something doesn't add up!

Andy

Umm, no. The lower HP run (without the large dip) made the GDP look even better. We didnt use that run because it wasnt close to numbers that JP had run here in the past.

We are only doing tests like this to see what really works on trucks with the mods that so many of us have. There is no ulterior motive. If it doesnt work, I dont want to carry it. If I sell a bunch of manifolds, that is cool, but I doubt I'll ever see as much margin from these sales to cover the time and effort involved in doing these tests. Nor will it make a dent in the $60k invested in the dyno equipment.

So what exactly would my motivation be to mislead anyone?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlibert (Post 1919901)

My foot never slipped off the pedal. I think the dips may be from when Erik was applying the load. just a guess.

That could have been it too. I am ignoring it since the rest of the run is consistent and the boost levels were consistent run to run.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmccart (Post 1919880)

Hey Erik, are you comparing the CFM & Glacier on that?

Thanx.

Nope, those tests were done on different trucks. The #'s I was referring to were the GDPs gains over the stock setup.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erik@TVP (Post 1919919)

Nope, those tests were done on different trucks. The #'s I was referring to were the GDPs gains over the stock setup.

Thanx for answering my stupid question.