3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only) Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for third generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories. THIS IS FOR THE 5.9L ONLY!

30 mpg (not hand calc) in magazine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #1  
buzzinhalfdoz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: east tn
30 mpg (not hand calc) in magazine

anybody seen the story on the cummins in canada that gets 30mpg at 70-75mph??? all the story said was about his mods and shown a pic of his lie-o-meter at 26, never told about hand calc, surley these guys at the magiznes know that the lie-o-meter goes up with mods... mine reads 30-33 and hand calc it is 21-24... the only way i can get 30mpg(per gal #2) is buy adding wvo and not counting it...
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 06:24 PM
  #2  
3500_CTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut.
what do you have done for mpg im only readin 13.5 overhead and thats nothin hand calculated
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 06:30 PM
  #3  
ShutupAndHoldOn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
I read an article like that a while back. Once I took a close look the guy was injecting natural gas or propane in huge amounts. I don't think these things can do better than 24-25MPG. Also keep in mind the Canuck gallon is about 13% more than a US gallon. Maybe someone is doing math wrong.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #4  
Nsomniac05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville NC
I saw it. he claimed 34 mpg and had a 4 page spread, AND the top part of the cover. I have what he has, Minus the CAT, and i have stage 2 DDP's worth 2mpg, A Helix2, FASS, Intercooler, and a grid delete, and I get 26 at best hand calc. I think that guy was a little ignorant to the reality of things.... On that note, All of his mods were installed by NADP. I think i would have got a FOR SURE hand calc before i made ridiculous claims to a magazine.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 07:19 PM
  #5  
joesixpack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
I laughed my edit off when I read that too, .....complete edit, bigger tires, 70mph cruise, better than 34 MPG (remember our gallons are a bit bigger) but still....please.

Blatant ad for NADP.....bottom of article....sourse...NADP

Last edited by t-boe; Feb 18, 2009 at 08:39 AM. Reason: Profanity
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 07:33 PM
  #6  
molalla1ton's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Molalla, Oregon
surely they jest, I know what my mileage is and it sure is not even close to that and that is driving like the grandpa I am. If I drive like the kid in me. . .its really funny.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #7  
good ole boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: saskatoon saskatchewan Canada
Its the april issue so I think they are going to say it was a april fools joke.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:35 PM
  #8  
snoyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
I think one of the powerstroke guys back in the day did a ton of fuel mileage, and claimed somewhere in the 27 MPG range. However, at some point, with all the mods he had done to the truck, it really stopped being a useful pickup....
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 12:40 AM
  #9  
blackjet2500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: New Albany, Ms
Depends a lot on the road, i don't see anyone getting 30+ mpg at 70-75mph, but i've squeezed out 30.2 mpg(hand calc-876 miles with 29 gal at fill up) on a FLAT FLAT 4lane down here where the speed limit is 55 back when i had an intake, exhaust, and a PMT. The overhead was saying 38mpg. At 70-75 that kind of milage is out of reach i'd say though
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 08:25 AM
  #10  
Big C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
at 70mph with my 35" tires I run at 1800 rpm and get about 20mpg. He said he had 285s on it, I think his rpm would be over 2000rpm which then the truck will use more fuel. I know mine does, If I go about 2100 rpm my mileage goes way down (16-17mpg range)
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #11  
cameroneod's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 1
From: WNC
I get 24-26, depending on grades, when using cruise. Hand checked and double checked. 30 is certainly possible.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #12  
blackjet2500's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: New Albany, Ms
Originally Posted by cameroneod
I get 24-26, depending on grades, when using cruise. Hand checked and double checked. 30 is certainly possible.
24-26 at what speeds?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #13  
buzzinhalfdoz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: east tn
Originally Posted by 3500_CTD
what do you have done for mpg im only readin 13.5 overhead and thats nothin hand calculated
i have a voilant air box
quadzilla mpg module(lie o meter went up) into the low 30s
fitch fuel catylist
free flow muffler
afe bladerunner intake
+50hp nozzles(lie o meter went down) back down to high 20s
i once got 26.6 for a day of driveing, man i had to baby it all day, never over 50-55 mph and upshift at about 1600rpm. i would let it lug down to 1000rpm and pull away when i could. noway 30+ at 70mph with his mods. if i blend wvo to my #2 and only count the #2 gallons i buy then i can get 30mpg per gal #2, but that is the only way. i think lock out hubs, and a gearvendors overdrive would help , but that is a lot of money.i have 285s now , when they wear out i am going to 275s for the weight saveings, maby help with mpg...
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 03:29 AM
  #14  
The Baron's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Kingston, Ontario
I saw that article too, and was pretty skeptical. The guy had done a ton of mods, but 34mpg is crazy. I'm no mechanic, but one of that guys "mods" was running a much lighter oil in his motor and I don't think I'd be comfortable sacrificing engine protection for a small gain in mileage.

I paid more serious attention to the article in the same magazine on the mods to a 2007 mega cab with a 5.9 (AFE air, Bladerunner and exhaust and BullyDog E3). That sounded reasonable and I have the same vehicle and haven't decided on mods yet.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 08:13 AM
  #15  
mopardamo's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 294
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Hello,

COMPLETE MAGAZINE HYPE.

Done

Damon
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.