3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Transmission Flush vs. filter and fluid change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #31  
2003Ram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Hounddog
Sold/handled FLIUD EXCHANGE on many many D.C. auto trasnnys over 3 years and its the best thing that ever happened to as auto tranny and a car owner.Never had any issues unless it was about to crash to start with.
How would you know if a tranny was about to crash?
Why would you do a flush if you knew a tranny was on it's last leg?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #32  
Spooler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,902
Likes: 5
From: Claxton, GA
Originally Posted by 2003Ram
How would you know if a tranny was about to crash?
Why would you do a flush if you knew a tranny was on it's last leg?
Because the customers tell the service writer or Tech's what the tranny is doing. It can give you an excellent idea of what is going on with their vehicle. Signs are slipping, not moving when putting in gear somtimes, noise, shudder, and other things that might happen. As far as why do it, it's either take a chance with the fluid exchange or rebuild/replace the transmission. Most times people can get by for another 25,000 to 50,000 miles depending on how bad it is.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #33  
2003Ram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Spooler
Because the customers tell the service writer or Tech's what the tranny is doing. It can give you an excellent idea of what is going on with their vehicle. Signs are slipping, not moving when putting in gear somtimes, noise, shudder, and other things that might happen. As far as why do it, it's either take a chance with the fluid exchange or rebuild/replace the transmission. Most times people can get by for another 25,000 to 50,000 miles depending on how bad it is.
Sounds fishy...........
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #34  
05HDRAM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
I find it hard to believe that a fluid exchange is destroying transmissions. If this were true, wouldn't this be more than a handful of cases ? I can't even imagine how many fluid exchange machines there are across the country. If a flush was done and then the transmission went south, I find it hard to believe the flush alone was the culprit.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #35  
el toro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
For those of you guys doing your own tranny service, whether dropping the pan and just changing oil in the pan, or doing the entire fluid exchange, what are you doing about the band adjustment. Are you doing that on your own, or dealer, or disregarding?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #36  
DBLR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 1
From: Forest Grove, Oregon
Having the Band adjustment is up to you. I've had several re-builders over the years tell me not to have them adjusted at all and some people on the forums say its needed at every service. I did get my local Dodge SM to say I did not need to adjust mine at every service as my truck is not driven in town very much. Oh the SM also said more people should use Tow/Haul mode when driving in town.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 02:19 PM
  #37  
lamadera's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by 05HDRAM
I find it hard to believe that a fluid exchange is destroying transmissions. If this were true, wouldn't this be more than a handful of cases ? I can't even imagine how many fluid exchange machines there are across the country. If a flush was done and then the transmission went south, I find it hard to believe the flush alone was the culprit.
It's rare, but two guys on this thread have said they had no issues before a flush, and I have heard tranny experts say the same (guys with a lifetime of experience). I'm sure it has something to do with who is doing the work also. Makes me think twice about doing a flush.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #38  
Spooler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,902
Likes: 5
From: Claxton, GA
Originally Posted by 2003Ram
Sounds fishy...........
You obviously have never been a tech. Customers have very good information, they just don't know it. Talking with them helps point you in the right direction when driveability problems arise so you can duplicate the issue. Nothings fishy, its not rocket science. I'm done!!!!!

As I said before, Here we go again.....
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #39  
2003Ram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Spooler
You obviously have never been a tech. Customers have very good information, they just don't know it. Talking with them helps point you in the right direction when driveability problems arise so you can duplicate the issue. Nothings fishy, its not rocket science. I'm done!!!!!

As I said before, Here we go again.....
Does anyone believe that when a customer comes in and reports the trans shudders or slips, that a flush will fix it?

Come on..............
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 04:03 PM
  #40  
monnshyne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Middletown In.
Originally Posted by enafzige
I would kindof be skeptical of the flush systems. When I worked at the transmission shop a couple years ago, it was amazing how many people came in having transmission problems, who had just had their transmissions flushed.

It seems as if the flushing often dislodges something either from the filter, magnet, etc, and debris becomes stuck on a valve in the valve body, or other close tolerance bore. Although we had a flush machine, we always recommended dropping the pan, and changing the filter instead...even though it meant more labor and not as much profit.

If the customer wanted a "complete" fluid change, we would drop the pan, fill back up with fluid. Then, drive around the block a few times, and do it again.

Flushing seems to work for some, but I've seen a lot of problems coincidentally arising from flushes as well...too many to recommend to a friend, for sure. --Eric
Yea I can agree with you on this. When I do a flush on my truck I drop my pan 4 times to flush it. Using 24 quarts to flush it isn't cheap but when you have 7k tied up in a tranny doing it right is what counts.

Mark
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #41  
griesera's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
I think that we have all made some pretty good points on this topic. If you tranny has never been serviced and has 100k on it, yer dumb for flushing it, BUT if you do a routine flush ever 20-30k and keep the fluid in good shape so there isn't any debis build up you'll be fine. I think you should do what ever makes you feel the best. Personally I pull the plug on my pan every other oil change, and put in 6 qts of fresh oil, change the filter ever 18k, and flush every 30k. It may be overkill, but when u spend the money on these trucks you might as well maintain em. Like i said, do what u think is best. It's yer choice.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #42  
dezeldog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: the mitten
Originally Posted by 2003Ram
Use only ATF +4 for the 48RE. It is synthetic.
Is amsoil synthetic a accepted fluid for the 48RE?? Curious minds need to know.

Jim
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #43  
booman70's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Modena,New York
I personally dont mind the 18 bucks for the filter pretty cheap if you ask me.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #44  
2003Ram's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by dezeldog
Is amsoil synthetic a accepted fluid for the 48RE?? Curious minds need to know.

Jim
I have heard people say they have used Amsoil without issue however it is not ATF +4. I feel comfortable with ATF +4 only based on lots Q&A with knowledgeable Tranny guys. When talking about the 48RE, Amsoil would not be a better replacement over ATF +4, it's just a replacement.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #45  
DBLR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 1
From: Forest Grove, Oregon
I have Amsoil ATF in my transmission right now and have not had any problems with it being in there. BTW, Dodge ATF 4+ is made from Group III dino oil base stock. Amsoil synthetic ATF is made from Group IV base stock that is chemically engineered.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.