1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Non turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2017, 09:06 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tractorslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 7
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Non turbo

So I have been hearing for awhile now that they made a CUMMINS non turbo truck before 89. By what I have heard these truck where built for the railroad. Just looking for your guys input on wether you believe it or not.
Old 10-17-2017, 10:46 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
deere country's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: southern mn
Posts: 529
Received 130 Likes on 84 Posts
Not that I am aware of. The only other diesel option I have seen in a full size dodge is the Mitsubishi diesel that was used in the 70s truck. It was a non turboed model.

Where have you been hearing this information from?
Old 10-18-2017, 04:23 AM
  #3  
KRB
Registered User
 
KRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central KY
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 0
Received 495 Likes on 349 Posts
That's all I've ever known too. I thought it was a Perkins though but that is by memory.
Old 10-18-2017, 05:43 AM
  #4  
Administrator
 
Jim Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,083
Received 232 Likes on 161 Posts
https://www.allpar.com/mopar/mitsubishi-diesel.html
It is true.
The following users liked this post:
mknittle (10-18-2017)
Old 10-18-2017, 07:34 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
mknittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 4,918
Received 600 Likes on 437 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim Lane
There were some in International Scouts also.
Old 10-18-2017, 07:52 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tractorslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 7
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By what I had heard was that they built them with the Cummins motor but did not put a turbo in it and they were all shipped to the railroad. which makes sense because they had put the 12 valve into commercial use before they put them in the trucks. now my reason for asking is because supposedly my truck has injector out of a nonturbo 12 valve (bigger injectors). The reason for this is that my truck is one of the classicly modified 12 valves with an old smokey fuel pin and a bigger turbo turbine out of a bus.
Old 10-18-2017, 09:30 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
james1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Englewood, TN
Posts: 807
Received 41 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim Lane
Thanks for posting. The article says "In 1978 and into the 1980s, Dodge sold, as a factory option, the Mitsubishi diesels in D150s, D250s, and Power Wagons..."

My collection of Mopar parts manuals goes back to '82 and it appears Dodge had ceased to offer the Mitsubishi diesel by the 1982 model year (see attached page).
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
82_83PartsManualPage5.pdf (70.9 KB, 60 views)
Old 10-18-2017, 02:50 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
u2slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 1,606
Received 345 Likes on 284 Posts
Originally Posted by tractorslayer
So I have been hearing for awhile now that they made a CUMMINS non turbo truck before 89.
Anything is possible when custom built/ordered, repowered, etc.

FWIW, we have equipment like this at work... 4BT, non-turbo, automatic.

Old 10-18-2017, 05:36 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
bigragu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,867
Received 535 Likes on 391 Posts
Originally Posted by u2slow
Anything is possible when custom built/ordered, repowered, etc.

FWIW, we have equipment like this at work... 4BT, non-turbo, automatic.

You tweak the power screw on that at all, lol
Old 10-18-2017, 06:24 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
u2slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 1,606
Received 345 Likes on 284 Posts
Originally Posted by bigragu
You tweak the power screw on that at all, lol
Nope The knuckle-draggers here have trouble operating the equipment with normal tuning. That's a sample pic... but ours has a 4.5L version, and looks like some sort of CAV mechanical pump.
The following users liked this post:
mknittle (10-19-2017)
Old 10-19-2017, 05:49 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
mknittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 4,918
Received 600 Likes on 437 Posts
Originally Posted by u2slow
Nope The knuckle-draggers here have trouble operating the equipment with normal tuning. That's a sample pic... but ours has a 4.5L version, and looks like some sort of CAV mechanical pump.
I used to have a Cummins book listing the industrial B series fuel pumps and injectors.
There is a bunch of them.
Old 10-19-2017, 06:35 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
deere country's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: southern mn
Posts: 529
Received 130 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by tractorslayer
By what I had heard was that they built them with the Cummins motor but did not put a turbo in it and they were all shipped to the railroad. which makes sense because they had put the 12 valve into commercial use before they put them in the trucks. now my reason for asking is because supposedly my truck has injector out of a nonturbo 12 valve (bigger injectors). The reason for this is that my truck is one of the classicly modified 12 valves with an old smokey fuel pin and a bigger turbo turbine out of a bus.
If you had a non turbo version b series engine it would not utilize "bigger" injection nozzles as it would not be able to properly atomized more fuel with natural aspiration. So that makes the story you have been told questionable in my view. I am curious as to where you had heard this from? As anything is possible, some things are just that a story someone created.
The following users liked this post:
mknittle (10-19-2017)
Old 10-19-2017, 03:21 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
MrFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PA near Harrisburg
Posts: 1,296
Received 308 Likes on 234 Posts
Sounds like a mixture of fact and confusion. I could easily see someone misinterpreting the late 70's Mitsubishi engine as being N/A Cummins 6bt.
The following users liked this post:
mknittle (10-20-2017)
Old 10-20-2017, 07:11 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
mknittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 4,918
Received 600 Likes on 437 Posts
Originally Posted by MrFusion
Sounds like a mixture of fact and confusion. I could easily see someone misinterpreting the late 70's Mitsubishi engine as being N/A Cummins 6bt.
That's what I think.
Old 10-20-2017, 07:54 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
oliver foster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: vermont
Posts: 6,325
Received 2,378 Likes on 1,572 Posts
Originally Posted by deere country
If you had a non turbo version b series engine it would not utilize "bigger" injection nozzles as it would not be able to properly atomized more fuel with natural aspiration. So that makes the story you have been told questionable in my view. I am curious as to where you had heard this from? As anything is possible, some things are just that a story someone created.
I thought that was strange as well.
Less air and more fuel is a puzzling choice, unless rolling coal is the ONLY goal.
Just putting a plastic bag over your air cleaner will do that...
The following users liked this post:
mknittle (10-20-2017)


Quick Reply: Non turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.