1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Johny5's Crew Cab

Old Jan 20, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #31  
PapeCAT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 85
So why was the diesel tank too much work. I was going to put it in my crew but I have a 3 tank setup in there now that is haggard.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #32  
johny5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: langley bc canada
The diesel tank was too tall under the crew cab . i could of re shaped it like Bruiser did by using a heat gun to warm up the plastic but after a half hour i gave up.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #33  
AUGIE DOG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: APEX,NC
So your saying the d250 tank was to big? If so then try using the stock tank from your cc. The guy who did my conversion tried to use the donor tank and he butchered it. So i just put the stock tank back in ...not a problem.For some reason i just think putting the cc on the x-tended frame is a better fit. I believe the frame and other components are beefier due to the truck being built with a diesel.Now that's just me thinking.. I might be wrong, i really haven't got in there and took measurements or did research on the tensile strength of the frame.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:58 AM
  #34  
johny5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: langley bc canada
I'm not sure its any beefier (i didn't mic it).but the d250 frame jogs up sooner than the CC frame causing problems for the CC cab.
If someone didn't want to swap every thing over or didn't have the frame
modifying the cab wouldn't be a big deal.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #35  
BRUISER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by johny5
The diesel tank was too tall under the crew cab . i could of re shaped it like Bruiser did by using a heat gun to warm up the plastic but after a half hour i gave up.
yup.. it was a pain in the butt to get tank to change shape.. and after i got it shapped I had to put a piece of wood on it, then keep it compressed for 24 hrs for it to hold shape.

the test is going to be when it really warms up(summer) to see if tank tries to heat up and expand back to its original shape
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 04:07 PM
  #36  
PapeCAT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 85
wow... I might have to seriously look at getting a large fuel xfer tank for the bed.

Too bad the bed is already a shorty...

the plus side is that I might still be able to keep the brownie aux trans in there... The diesel tank won't be able to fit with it back there as it is now.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 04:48 PM
  #37  
simplysmn's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 2
From: Apple Valley Ca.
a tank should fit just fine from a 90's diesel Mine was from a 93 and it bolted right back in without any problem's . But I also had a body lift so maybe thats why I didn't have any problem's
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 06:53 PM
  #38  
johny5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: langley bc canada
Yep body lift would of made it work.

My plan to use the crew cab for mostly road trips as a tow rig, hopefully I don't need to carry any more than the 30 gallons
If do I thought about using a tank behind the seat from the earlier trucks.(no idea if they fit)
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #39  
RumbleFish's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by simplysmn
a tank should fit just fine from a 90's diesel Mine was from a 93 and it bolted right back in without any problem's . But I also had a body lift so maybe thats why I didn't have any problem's
you probably didnt have an issue since yours was a long bed. iirc the problem is that the tank hits the bottom of the cab when used in a short bed crew.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #40  
simplysmn's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 2
From: Apple Valley Ca.
Originally Posted by RumbleFish
you probably didnt have an issue since yours was a long bed. iirc the problem is that the tank hits the bottom of the cab when used in a short bed crew.
That's good to know because my new project is going to be a shortbed crewcab but I think I will go back with a body lift anyway I plan to run a 325-85 R 16 michellin tire again just not going to go 11 inches of lift this time
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 11:45 PM
  #41  
Alwaysworking's Avatar
alwaysonDTR
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
From: Keizer, oregon
what about useing the ramcharger tank in the rear like trooperthorn did?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 02:11 AM
  #42  
PapeCAT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 85
that sounds like a cool plan, how many gallons is the ramcharger tank?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 07:07 AM
  #43  
RumbleFish's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
34ish iirc
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 09:26 AM
  #44  
BRUISER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
here are some pics of '92 regular cab diesel tank in my '85 crew cab

you see the hump at rear of cab, that was what I had to heat and shape.. it sticks up to high for the crew cab ( unless you have abody lift)





this last pic sort of shows the little gap I ended up with after shaping it
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 10:28 AM
  #45  
haloman's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,529
Likes: 0
That is a sweet project. Everything looks top notch.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.