1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Intercooler ?s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 08:27 PM
  #1  
xtremexj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Intercooler ?s

I see a lot of discussion on how to intercool a non-I/C 1st gen Cummins. Has anyone ever considered any of the universal I/C kits for the ricers? You can get a small Greddy (core size 27"x5.5"x2.5") with a piping kit and elbows for $160. I figure you could find a way to mount it behind the front bumper and cut some holes in the bumper to allow the air flow. What do you think of that?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 08:42 PM
  #2  
flashgordon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 1
From: WY
Originally Posted by xtremexj
I see a lot of discussion on how to intercool a non-I/C 1st gen Cummins. Has anyone ever considered any of the universal I/C kits for the ricers? You can get a small Greddy (core size 27"x5.5"x2.5") with a piping kit and elbows for $160. I figure you could find a way to mount it behind the front bumper and cut some holes in the bumper to allow the air flow. What do you think of that?
the only thing that would bother me is if it would flow with out restriction, and if it would be effecient or as effecient as the stoke one!
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #3  
jrussell's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I'm by no means an expert in turbos/intercoolers, but I think a typical ricer with a turbo only runs about 6-8psi of boost. Flash might be right that an IC made for such low psi/flow would be restrictive on our trucks.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 05:25 PM
  #4  
xtremexj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Just to let you all know, the manufacturer of the intercooler I was referring to e-mailed me back and said that their units are rated for up to 42psi. Just thought you'd want to know.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #5  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
Sounds good! Did they give any flow numbers?
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 05:37 PM
  #6  
flashgordon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 1
From: WY
Originally Posted by xtremexj
Just to let you all know, the manufacturer of the intercooler I was referring to e-mailed me back and said that their units are rated for up to 42psi. Just thought you'd want to know.

Not trying to be a pesames, about this idea.....it might work, but there would have to be some stock intercooler volume numbers made at that or some ether psi w/ volume ##that mached or hopfully better then the stock intercooler

if a rice rocket intercooler company could show side by side resolts between stock and theres then i would be interested.....that is of theres showed better volume for said psi!!!
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #7  
xtremexj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Wanna - no flow numbers listed on E-bay. With more research one could probably find that info.
Flash - a side by side comparison would be awesome!
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #8  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
With a core that size it's not going to be as effective at cooling as a stock IC, but it's better than a sharp stick in the eye if you have a non-intercooled truck. That's assuming of course that it can flow enough air to not be a restriction.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 09:34 PM
  #9  
DeanM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: MA USA
What you have to understand is that a bad intercooler is worse that no intercooler. Because a restrictive intercooler makes you motor work harder. So what you want is a big intercooler with a low pressure drop that also cools the charge. So a small ricer intercooler wouldn't work on a big turbo truck.

Dean
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 10:45 PM
  #10  
willieboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
What would be a small pressure drop? 1.5 psi, more, less? I have seen several that are "advertised" for Trucks. Some of them look to be good size, 3" cores, the size of a radiator, etc... Also, is this something that mounts in front of the radiator, or does it go below? Boost is a new thing for me, so sorry if the question is a little elementary.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2006 | 11:18 PM
  #11  
flashgordon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 1
From: WY
Originally Posted by willieboy
What would be a small pressure drop? 1.5 psi, more, less? I have seen several that are "advertised" for Trucks. Some of them look to be good size, 3" cores, the size of a radiator, etc... Also, is this something that mounts in front of the radiator, or does it go below? Boost is a new thing for me, so sorry if the question is a little elementary.
Ya piers has the one that is on top of my list....so far!

Don't now what pressure drop would be good or bad thow.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 10:15 PM
  #12  
DeanM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: MA USA
Less than 1.5 psi is good. My Porsche is close to 0 psi boost loss. You have to be careful with the advertised boost loss figures cause they might be biased. In otherwords when the intercooler is flowing hardly any air there will be very little boost loss.

And yes they go infront of the radiator or any where you can get air across the fins

Dean
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 08:34 PM
  #13  
wannadiesel's Avatar
Adminstrator-ess
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 19
From: New Holland, PA
I would look at flow numbers more than pressure drop. We drop several psi across the stock IC's, but that is mostly due to the cooling effect.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #14  
DeanM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: MA USA
Originally Posted by wannadiesel
I would look at flow numbers more than pressure drop. We drop several psi across the stock IC's, but that is mostly due to the cooling effect.
Are you sure of that, or could it be that the design sucks. I am going with the design suck theory
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92smokin blacky
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
10
Jan 14, 2010 09:23 AM
6Stix
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
3
Feb 13, 2009 08:32 AM
mullishacrew
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
Oct 30, 2008 09:29 PM
Marine
24 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
7
Feb 7, 2003 06:32 PM
csaverline
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
2
Oct 23, 2002 04:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.