1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Hypothetical mileage question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #1  
KRB's Avatar
KRB
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 571
From: Central KY
Hypothetical mileage question

Say you have two identical trucks EXCEPT one is a W250 auto and the other is a W350 DRW stick. Everything else the same.

Now, would the extra weight & rolling mass of the DRW ton offset the mileage gained by losing the 518 automatic?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #2  
Crossy's son's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,547
Likes: 2
From: Quinton, New Jersey (middle of nowhere)
Teh 518 IMHO is better for fuel mileage because it has a .69 overdrive

and the getrag has a .77

So the W250 should get better fuel mileage for two reasons-

Less Weight
Deeper overdrive
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #3  
archer39's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 2
From: Pottstown, PA
Originally Posted by Crossy's son
Teh 518 IMHO is better for fuel mileage because it has a .69 overdrive

and the getrag has a .77

So the W250 should get better fuel mileage for two reasons-

Less Weight
Deeper overdrive
theoretically that is correct. But lets not forget that many auto's are running around with some pretty poor torque converters.

the majority of the MPG threads that i read on here stick trucks almost always report better MPG than auto's.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #4  
Crossy's son's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,547
Likes: 2
From: Quinton, New Jersey (middle of nowhere)
Originally Posted by archer39
theoretically that is correct. But lets not forget that many auto's are running around with some pretty poor torque converters.

the majority of the MPG threads that i read on here stick trucks almost always report better MPG than auto's.
the majority of people don't have this-

366 gov. spring, fuel screw maxed, home cut fuel pin, potentiometer controlled OD, 5" miter cut stacks, gillett stage 2 (60mm wheel/housing), BHAF, coal train EDM 435 injectors, piston LP
Fall Brawl 08 304hp/525tq

A good tranny/converter should out MPG a good getrag 5th gear/good clutch on the highway running 65 in my opinion.

A getrag truck will probably get better mpg on the highway TOWING because the O/D would probably be off in the auto truck. This is all theoretic though.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #5  
BearKiller's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 95
From: KENTUCKY
It shouldn't make any difference whatsoever, because when we was in grade-school, our science teacher had two kids go up on the gym roof and drop two round *****, one a big heavy bowling-ball, the other a hollow plastic ball; both ***** hit the ground at exactly the same time.

According to our scientific findings, since both truck-bodies are the same shape, they should go the same distance with the same amount of gravity, regardless of one being heavier than the other.


I won't go into all the complicated equations and theories that back up my reasoning.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #6  
GasganoFJ60's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Stephenville / Harlingen Texas
Originally Posted by archer39
theoretically that is correct. But lets not forget that many auto's are running around with some pretty poor torque converters.

the majority of the MPG threads that i read on here stick trucks almost always report better MPG than auto's.
Im gonna agree with that.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #7  
AUGIE DOG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: APEX,NC
I can solve this whole problem,this is the solution....KEEP YOUR FOOT OUT OF THE GO PEDAL!!! There, you now have the solution to your hypothetical dilemma. But not many of us can't do that. I still have the 4:10 in my truck from my conversion. I did add a 47rh with a rv rated tq, i did a trip from North Carolina to Illinois 805 miles. I kept it at 62 - 65 mph. and averaged between 22 and 25 mpg. This is an 85-D350, 2wd, crewcab shortbed,running 265/65/16 tires. My engine has over 200K. No matter what power upgrades you throw to these trucks they still give the biggest bang for your dollar. To many variables are involved here but keep one thing in mind...the solution is above Now, the fee for my solution to your dilemma is a set of POD'S or a bigger turbo so i can go faster.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #8  
BearKiller's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 95
From: KENTUCKY
Originally Posted by AUGIE DOG
But not many of us can't do that.

Now I'm confused.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 05:12 PM
  #9  
archer39's Avatar
Chapter President
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 2
From: Pottstown, PA
Originally Posted by Crossy's son
the majority of people don't have this-

366 gov. spring, fuel screw maxed, home cut fuel pin, potentiometer controlled OD, 5" miter cut stacks, gillett stage 2 (60mm wheel/housing), BHAF, coal train EDM 435 injectors, piston LP
Fall Brawl 08 304hp/525tq

A good tranny/converter should out MPG a good getrag 5th gear/good clutch on the highway running 65 in my opinion.

A getrag truck will probably get better mpg on the highway TOWING because the O/D would probably be off in the auto truck. This is all theoretic though.
yea many people may not have quite the mods i have. The best mileage i got from my truck was with all my mods.

if you do all the "free" tweaks that can be done to these trucks the stock trans (designed to slip behind the power of the cummins) will be hurting and hurting you mileage. And the majority of the members here don't keep there truck stock for long. So without sinking more than a grand into your auto it will be hard to keep up with the MPG of a stick truck IMO.

but like stated above keeping your foot out if is the biggest difference.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #10  
Crossy's son's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,547
Likes: 2
From: Quinton, New Jersey (middle of nowhere)
Originally Posted by BearKiller
Now I'm confused.
you beat me to it. lol.

He proved a point then reversed it with the "don't"
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 06:06 PM
  #11  
Crossy's son's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,547
Likes: 2
From: Quinton, New Jersey (middle of nowhere)
Originally Posted by archer39
yea many people may not have quite the mods i have. The best mileage i got from my truck was with all my mods.

if you do all the "free" tweaks that can be done to these trucks the stock trans (designed to slip behind the power of the cummins) will be hurting and hurting you mileage. And the majority of the members here don't keep there truck stock for long. So without sinking more than a grand into your auto it will be hard to keep up with the MPG of a stick truck IMO.

but like stated above keeping your foot out if is the biggest difference.
I just got burnt.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #12  
GasganoFJ60's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Stephenville / Harlingen Texas
Originally Posted by AUGIE DOG
I can solve this whole problem,this is the solution....KEEP YOUR FOOT OUT OF THE GO PEDAL!!!

Even if you keep a light foot I still think a manual trans will get better MPG.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #13  
JQmile's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 5
At 55-60mph I was able to out mileage a W250 with a manual by a good shot.....27mpg vs 23.4mpg. And I have a 727 (no overdrive) drive slow.

Oh PS, I have an aftermarket converter which picked me up a few mpg.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 12:26 AM
  #14  
90firstgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 753
Likes: 1
From: Salina, Kansas
Originally Posted by BearKiller
It shouldn't make any difference whatsoever, because when we was in grade-school, our science teacher had two kids go up on the gym roof and drop two round *****, one a big heavy bowling-ball, the other a hollow plastic ball; both ***** hit the ground at exactly the same time.

According to our scientific findings, since both truck-bodies are the same shape, they should go the same distance with the same amount of gravity, regardless of one being heavier than the other.


I won't go into all the complicated equations and theories that back up my reasoning.
More weight = more friction between the tires and the road = requires more power (fuel) to push down the road. Of course then you can factor in tire type etc... but if you kept those variabes constant, the heavier truck requires more power to go down the road.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 05:12 AM
  #15  
KRB's Avatar
KRB
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 571
From: Central KY
Originally Posted by 90firstgen
More weight = more friction between the tires and the road = requires more power (fuel) to push down the road. Of course then you can factor in tire type etc... but if you kept those variabes constant, the heavier truck requires more power to go down the road.
Thats what I was getting at. Both trucks may fall at the same rate off the top of a cliff , but hauling a load (two extra wheels +?) eats at mileage. I guess those fenders add some drag too? Both trucks are geared with the 3.54s.

I figure that the sloppy torque converter cancels out any gains from weight reduction, etc?

I'm still trying to talk myself out of that W350 (although my bank account is doing a pretty good job right now ). The frames seem identical. Even the springs look the same. Only difference is the front sway bar (do all tons have that?) and training wheels. Oh I would reckon a Getrag is lighter in weight than the 518?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.