1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Difference in body quality 77' vs. 92'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2019, 10:14 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Torque_Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Northern Virgina
Posts: 20
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Difference in body quality 77' vs. 92'

Hey guys, this is my first ever post on here and I was wondering if there was a difference in the sheet metal on a 77' W200 vs a 92' W250. I haven't been able to find anything about how good the doors, cab and fender quality of a 77' is compared to a newer 92'. Thanks a ton, if I'm doin this wrong tell me please.
Context: I have a 92' and am considering a swap to a 77' or 78' cab this would be the game changer in that decision.
Old 03-11-2019, 12:25 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Berta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Alberta
Posts: 18
Received 27 Likes on 7 Posts
Hello Torque Junkie, I believe the 1972-1980 body style is quite a bit different from the early 1981-1993 body style that is generally considered the first generation dodges most are familiar with and I don't believe the fenders,doors ect are cross compatible. With the cab possibly being the exception, although I know the dashes are very different. As far as the quality of the sheet metal its a toss up I personally havn't noticed a specific year to be better then the next. Hopefully this helps!

Check out this wiki page for some pictures/info showing some of the differences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_D_series
Old 03-11-2019, 06:07 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
oliver foster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: vermont
Posts: 6,325
Received 2,379 Likes on 1,572 Posts
You can bolt the doors, fenders, beds, and cabs from '72-'93 years together without issues.
The body lines will NOT match up though.
Core supports, grilles, hoods / metal panel under the wipers, valance panels and such have subtle differences and all years will not mix and match.

I think the 70's sheetmetal is a thicker gauge I say this judging from how much abuse my old '72 Power Wagon took when I used it as a woods / trail rig. I flipped it over on its roof down a rocky ledge, rolled it on it side, stuffed it through rocks and tree where it didn't really fit ETC and it just kept running with just a few new crinkles and dents in the metal.
The following users liked this post:
Berta (03-11-2019)
Old 03-11-2019, 07:25 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
NJTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land of the Toxic Avenger
Posts: 6,769
Received 1,637 Likes on 1,112 Posts
Originally Posted by oliver foster
You can bolt the doors, fenders, beds, and cabs from '72-'93 years together without issues.
The body lines will NOT match up though.
Core supports, grilles, hoods / metal panel under the wipers, valance panels and such have subtle differences and all years will not mix and match.

I think the 70's sheetmetal is a thicker gauge I say this judging from how much abuse my old '72 Power Wagon took when I used it as a woods / trail rig. I flipped it over on its roof down a rocky ledge, rolled it on it side, stuffed it through rocks and tree where it didn't really fit ETC and it just kept running with just a few new crinkles and dents in the metal.
Uh... whadda you know, only owning more dodge metal than anyone on the planet.............



Other than Dodge itself, of course.

Old 03-11-2019, 02:44 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Torque_Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Northern Virgina
Posts: 20
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by oliver foster
I think the 70's sheetmetal is a thicker gauge I say this judging from how much abuse my old '72 Power Wagon took when I used it as a woods / trail rig. I flipped it over on its roof down a rocky ledge, rolled it on it side, stuffed it through rocks and tree where it didn't really fit ETC and it just kept running with just a few new crinkles and dents in the metal.
This is what I'm looking for thank you, do you have any hard numbers or not? Especially for things like the cab and fenders.(I just want something heavier duty than what I got now)
Old 03-11-2019, 03:05 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
mhuppertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tijeras, New Mexico, 7,000ft up
Posts: 4,003
Received 126 Likes on 70 Posts
The original post was about quality, I have had (and still have some) Dodge trucks from 1941 to 1993, and I think the '77 was probably a better body, as Oliver said, better steel. If I had to choose between premo '77 or '92 sheetmetal (but could keep the '92 interior) no question, '77.
I had a '72 W300, a '76 D100, and a '77 Mach Power Wagon, would love a '77 Macho Power Wagon on my '93 W250 Cummins Chassis.
Old 03-11-2019, 03:53 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
thrashingcows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 7,235
Received 1,331 Likes on 862 Posts
As Oliver has stated the earlier sheet metal does seem to be of a slightly thicker gauge and better quality. And as stated the sheet metal from the 70's trucks will swap with your 92 cab, just body lines will not be right. but if you decided to go with a 70's cab your HVAC and dash will not swap over without a fair amount of work.
Old 03-11-2019, 09:11 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Torque_Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Northern Virgina
Posts: 20
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by thrashingcows
but if you decided to go with a 70's cab your HVAC and dash will not swap over without a fair amount of work.
If you don't mind me asking how difficult would the modifications to the dash and HVAC box be? Would making a modified dash out of the 70's cab be easier? And to everyone that has helped thanks, the knowledge you guys have is vast and inspiring.
Old 03-11-2019, 09:23 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
thrashingcows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 7,235
Received 1,331 Likes on 862 Posts
I have never done this myself, but from pics and vehicles I have looked at the firewall is different on the HVAC side on the 70's cab, so you would have to cut and paste parts and pieces from the later cab to make things work. Not sure about mounting points for dash, pedal assemblies, location of e-brake pedal assembly etc.

IMO it would be better to keep your bare 92 cab and just swap doors, and then the rest of the 70's sheet metal.
Old 03-12-2019, 01:04 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Torque_Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Northern Virgina
Posts: 20
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Anybody know how bad the body lines are if you do this?^^ any pictures? That's totally the route I'll go if it looks good.
Old 03-12-2019, 03:38 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
PapeCAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,653
Received 79 Likes on 55 Posts
Body Lines wont be bad as long as you swap front clip AND doors. The body line fades to nothing when you get towards the aft of the doors. So Cabs shouldn't need to be swapped. The roof is more squared towards the back but it doesn't conflict with the earlier doors. I've done a couple cummins retrofits from a 93 to 72/73 as well and gutted/transferred the core support pieces and mounts as well. The early 72-79 sheetmetal is a thicker gauge vs. 80-93. When Chrysler was in bankruptcy trouble in the late 70's lee iacocca came in and retooled the body slightly to save on cost but couldn't afford to make a new truck from teh ground up so that is why 72-93 are so similar. I might be wrong as it has been some years but this is what I recall
Old 03-12-2019, 06:55 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
mopar2ya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 746
Received 74 Likes on 52 Posts
I had a 74 Ramcharger and the hoods would swap, that much I know and the older sheet metal was much thicker. My 93 sheet metal will dent by putting your elbows on it while leaning under the hood, I once had to jump off my roof onto my 74 Ramcharger hood when the ladder fell over. No dents at all.
Old 03-12-2019, 07:07 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
PapeCAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,653
Received 79 Likes on 55 Posts
For the hood, you'll need the cowl and also wiper pedestals. You'll need to lower the radiator and clearance the inside of the hood slightly for the two "tabs" that connect the fan shroud to the radiator. I believe the radiator ends up sitting on the grommets directly on the crossmember. There was still clearance for the fan and fan shroud under load etc. just ensure your engine mounts are good I suppose to prevent a ton of movement because if you lower the radiator to fit a bird bath hood, you will be lowering the fan shroud as well.
Old 03-12-2019, 08:51 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
dodgenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton,MO
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
't know if your Cummins is manual or auto, but if manual, some reworking of the bulkhead connector/ clutch master cylinder area will be required. 70's era trucks had a mechanical clutch linkage, and Cummins era trucks are hydraulic. Hyd setup requires a large hole that interferes with the bulkhead connector on early trucks. Some creative metal work is required if using the early cab.
Old 03-13-2019, 01:38 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
u2slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 1,606
Received 345 Likes on 284 Posts
All my Mexico-built doors (90-93) seem real cheap feeling/sounding. They're also the ones with cracks and hinges breaking out. My 84-90 USA built doors seem more solid. My 75-77 doors are too far gone to compare.

A little cut & paste on a firewall, or anywhere else not immediately visible isn't a big deal. Had to do a little for the hyd clutch in the '84 RC. Fine body work on outer panels... not my cup of tea

Also watch the VIN business if changing doors. In my jurisdiction, they want to see original fasteners in the tags, and frame VINs don't count.



Quick Reply: Difference in body quality 77' vs. 92'



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.