give me the cold truth...
#61
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimk
When I pull up to a stop light and the truck is trying to pull off is a irritate to me an that is with a stock converter. I generaly just ease the shifter into n if it is for any time at all at a stop light or what ever.
Anyone who has asked me how I like my truck pretty much gets the same response, the truck is pretty good, the motor is awesome, and the tranny is an absolute embarassment. But like others have said, once you get it beefed up (I plan on sending mine to GB this spring) it is IMO better than a manual tranny.
#62
Originally Posted by infidel
This Article has been proven to be 100% facts.
Auto Transmissions Explained
Written By Den052
Either install an auxiliary oil cooler to lower the transmission fluid and provide better lubrication, or switch to synthetic transmission oil or alternative oil such as hydraulic oil instead of ATF. When you think of hydraulic oil in a transmission, it is exactly that. After all, an automatic transmission is operated hydraulically, so it is not so far fetched. I use it in my Dodge instead of an oil cooler, and my pan stays clean 24/7.
Auto Transmissions Explained
Written By Den052
Either install an auxiliary oil cooler to lower the transmission fluid and provide better lubrication, or switch to synthetic transmission oil or alternative oil such as hydraulic oil instead of ATF. When you think of hydraulic oil in a transmission, it is exactly that. After all, an automatic transmission is operated hydraulically, so it is not so far fetched. I use it in my Dodge instead of an oil cooler, and my pan stays clean 24/7.
#63
Registered User
Originally Posted by Mslaughter
Has anyone ever switched from ATF to hyrdaulic oil? I read this in the FAQ section and did a search and this was closest thread I've found so far to mention it.
I've only heard one person the diesel boards swear by using hydraulic fluid.
Personally I don't see why a person would want to use it, hydraulic fluid isn't that much cheaper. Sort of reminds me of the concoctions some folks use in place of a designed for diesel fuel additive.
#64
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cummins Technical Center, IN
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Rare1, no apologies needed-- and I wanted to thank you for your excellent posting.
The problem, imo, with the stock automatic is twofold:
1) much lower capabilities than the engine (in terms of tq capacity)
2) improperly designed shift algorithms.
In the first case, it's just cost cutting and cheap parts and/or assembly quality. Ask Bill K about the quality of the machining of an OEM 47re or 48RE case to the parts that fit in it, and you'll get a lesson on tranny leakage.
In the second case, it's using "gasser" logic to control shift patterns. With the CTD, the tranny shouldn't have part throttle downshifts-- it should only downshift when the engine just can't pull the load, at normal RPM-- just like you'd do driving a stick. Instead, the OEM programming profile has part throttle downshifting that is a poor match to the low-rpm tq of the Cummins.
I suspect these two things are related, and that the trans is setup the way it is to help it live longer, because if it had to apply a hard load to the Cummins, the trans itself would see a much higher load and be more likely to fail given OEM quality.
jlh
The problem, imo, with the stock automatic is twofold:
1) much lower capabilities than the engine (in terms of tq capacity)
2) improperly designed shift algorithms.
In the first case, it's just cost cutting and cheap parts and/or assembly quality. Ask Bill K about the quality of the machining of an OEM 47re or 48RE case to the parts that fit in it, and you'll get a lesson on tranny leakage.
In the second case, it's using "gasser" logic to control shift patterns. With the CTD, the tranny shouldn't have part throttle downshifts-- it should only downshift when the engine just can't pull the load, at normal RPM-- just like you'd do driving a stick. Instead, the OEM programming profile has part throttle downshifting that is a poor match to the low-rpm tq of the Cummins.
I suspect these two things are related, and that the trans is setup the way it is to help it live longer, because if it had to apply a hard load to the Cummins, the trans itself would see a much higher load and be more likely to fail given OEM quality.
jlh
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3500eh
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
7
03-29-2007 10:22 PM
JDeere5105
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
45
11-29-2005 08:42 AM
tobyw
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
1
12-11-2002 08:46 AM