Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2003, 04:07 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Haulin_in_Dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Branchville, Alabama
Posts: 4,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

Towing and racing do share a lot of the same components but there is a large difference in what is needed. For instance I could not care less how long it takes my turbo to spool up, but once spooled I need the max boost and air flow for pulling hills and keeping EGT’s down. I have done a lot of reading from different sources on turbo size and have found this. Pulling Cummins ALWAYS recommend the largest turbo you can get with the largest outlet and exhaust diameter. Racing and hot-rod road driving is a different story. I have a couple of articles recommending the 16 cm housing for pulling. I realize that this is not good for ¼ mile and blowing the doors off rice burners. Without exception, any book or article from the Cummins builders all say the same thing, lower compression, more boost, larger exhaust and of course larger injectors. I was bothered by the fact that on this and other “SUV” boards this is not the route, leaving the smaller turbo outlet in place. See I am using my ISB as a big truck engine is used, not as a street machine. So experts out there, and we do have a bunch, I would like your comments on this subject. I do not really care how long the spoolup takes and racing a rice burner is not important in my case. I usually drive slow when not under a trailer and then run the hell out of it on the road near gross weight. Every bit of information I can get on building up a Cummins of any size for pulling loads up hills states that the larger turbo outlet is better for the engine and for pulling power. The important thing in my case is maintaining 70 to 73 up hills and on the flats with the minimum shifting possible while staying between 1900 and 2100 or 2200. When that becomes impossible I downshift (usually without losing spoolup) and keep it up above 2300. Converse to what I see on this board and others, I am considering the larger exhaust housing and 4 or 5" exhaust.
Old 07-17-2003, 05:48 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
AlpineRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austria Europe
Posts: 3,733
Received 263 Likes on 235 Posts
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

Hauling: I think you and the experts are right about using the bigger exhaust housing for a pure towing application. I think you should go for a bigger turbo like an HX40 with one of the bigger exhaust housings available, because if you operate a smaller compressor close to the end of its efficiency map it will increase intake air temperature. <br>For the normal acceleration junkie this combo would lag too much. <br><br>Just my 2c<br><br>AlpineRAM
Old 07-17-2003, 06:01 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Dieselbuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Nanoose Bay B.C. Canada
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

Always been a diesel fan (truck driver to many years) not a speed freak but like the fact you can hall 140,000lbs load up a 12 percent at 50 ,TORQUE IS WHERE IT'S AT ;D
Old 07-17-2003, 06:11 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Haulin_in_Dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Branchville, Alabama
Posts: 4,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

[quote author=Dieselbuilder link=board=4;threadid=17206;start=0#161147 date=1058482873]<br>Always been a diesel fan (truck driver to many years) not a speed freak but like the fact you can hall 140,000lbs load up a 12 percent at 50 ,TORQUE IS WHERE IT'S AT ;D<br>[/quote]<br><br>Happiness is watching the expression of the '03 Ford 6.0 while passing him on a hill
Old 07-17-2003, 06:20 PM
  #6  
Adminstrator-ess
 
wannadiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Holland, PA
Posts: 22,594
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

I am not an expert, but I agree that you'll see lower EGT's at high load with a bigger turbine housing. This is assuming that the bigger housing is capable of spinning the turbo fast enough to make enough boost for your fuel. I think you will pick up a little fuel economy by doing this, too. Lowering the drive pressure while keeping adequate boost will make the engine more efficient. I've read on other boards that 1st gen guys who put 12 and 14 cm non-wastegated housings on lost a couple mpg on the highway, so the reverse should be true for you. I'd bet you can get 18 and 21 cm non-wastegated housings for free to try (once I get my 12 cm wastegated one on, you can have the old one if you want it). The only things that would concern me would be smoke and EGT at lower RPM.
Old 07-17-2003, 09:22 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Bart Timothy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Jordan, Utah
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

I think it all depends on where you're towing. In higher elevations on twisting mountain roads a smaller, faster spooling turbo is better. Try pulling a heavy TT through Yellowstone with a large turbo and you'll see what I mean.
Old 07-18-2003, 01:59 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
hellotbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aurora, Ontario
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

Something around a PDR 40 or B1KS should be what you are looking for.
Old 07-19-2003, 03:08 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
KATOOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The "real" Northern CA
Posts: 4,179
Received 141 Likes on 107 Posts
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

What is expected in loss of boost or gain in EGT's with increase in altitude? Is there a ratio?
Old 07-20-2003, 09:46 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Push Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Drive till ya hit a Polar Bear, then go back 50 miles
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

Bill,<br><br>You've almost got it nailed with your comment about the largest turbo you can spool being the best in your application. Tie it in with Bart's comment about the turbo needing to spool properly at higher elevations, and you've got it. You don't need as much spoolup as a racer, but you still need decent spoolup.<br><br>We've got several hotshotters out there who are pulling some pretty good weights with an HX35/16, however they are still running awful warm (1200 - 1250F) so I believe that the compressor just can't deliver enough air for the heavier weights. I think if I were you, with your power level, I'd look to a hybrid HX40/HX35, probably with a 12cm or 14cm housing. You'll have a bigger compressor to drive more air, and the tighter housing will keep it spooling better in higher elevations. You'll definitely want the 4 inch exhaust as well.<br><br>Rod
Old 07-20-2003, 10:10 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Haulin_in_Dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Branchville, Alabama
Posts: 4,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

I want to thank everyone for the info and opinions on the turbo subject. Also I just found this on the BD site thought it might interest some.<br><br><br>1989-1993 Cummins 5.9 engines have a variety of large turbine housings that all result in a large turbo lag before boost is developed<br><br>All the above years will benefit by changing to a 16 sq cm housing to a non-waste gated turbine housing part #1045910 on stock or engines that have had high flow injectors installed<br><br>1994-1999 stock engines have the 12 sq cm w/g hsg that can be quite restrictive when the power is increased above 300 flywheel HP and results in high exhaust temperature. Changing to the 14 sq cm w/g turbine hsg # 1045920 or the 16-non/w/g hsg #1045910 will reduce temperature and improve engine power.<br><br>2001 automatic transmission equipped engines have a 9 or 10 sq cm hsg that is too restrictive for a high power increase (beyond the 300 hp) and should have our new HX35 Super Turbo installed. <br><br>
Old 07-21-2003, 11:14 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
gunracer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: dfw texas
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re:Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo

i hit 20 mpg for the first time after i swapped to a 14 cm wg housing on my truck [pretty good for a 4x4 dually]. it was well worth the time to install it. plus i have much more top end. it should work great with a good exhaust.unless you go pretty wild, i think the 35 will work like a champ for you. mike
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CTD_Neil
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
3
11-06-2005 03:45 PM
Metallakid
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
6
09-02-2005 02:40 AM
Dufrain
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
1
03-10-2005 01:09 AM
gwhammy
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
10
02-08-2005 08:01 PM



Quick Reply: Load pulling turbo vs hotrod turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.