1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

So Why Can't I Put A Boost-Fooler On My AFC?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2016, 11:55 AM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Gizmo52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
So in theory we can just put an adjustable boost elbow on the head where the boost reference line for the AFC housing is and control how much boost the AFC sees just like the boost elbow does on a waste gated turbo correct? Thus slowing the fuel rate at low rpms and clearing up smoke?
Old 07-18-2016, 05:20 PM
  #47  
1st Generation Admin
Thread Starter
 
BC847's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Buies Creek, NC
Posts: 4,597
Received 111 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by Gizmo52
So in theory we can just put an adjustable boost elbow on the head where the boost reference line for the AFC housing is and control how much boost the AFC sees just like the boost elbow does on a waste gated turbo correct? Thus slowing the fuel rate at low rpms and clearing up smoke?
Yes.
- I used a source of compressed air, that was controlled by an adjustable regulator, including a gauge to see what the regulator was putting out.
- You will need a second gauge to see what the elbow is putting out.

With the above, I was able to supply the boost-elbow with 10psig (this represents low, just off idle boost) and adjust the elbow so as to put out 5psig. Then increasing the supply to 60psig (this represents full WOT boost) and adjust the elbow so as to put out 30psig.

UNDERSTAND: The Boost-Elbow that I'm using includes a vent-port that vents an adjustable percentage to atmosphere. This is needed as an elbow without amounts to a simple restriction to the flow powering the AFC. You need flow, in order to use a portion of it, and waste the balance.

Make sense?

Overall, this amounts to a 2/1 ratio. The Boost-Elbow reduces the input by 50% across the board.

It's a PIT@ to set-up, but works relatively well.

NOTE: If you're running twins and are pondering going this route, consider simply powering the AFC directly from the Primary. Rounding things off substantially, it represents about 1/2 that seen at the intake-log (Secondary output).
Old 07-18-2016, 05:53 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Gizmo52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by BC847
Yes.
UNDERSTAND: The Boost-Elbow that I'm using includes a vent-port that vents an adjustable percentage to atmosphere. This is needed as an elbow without amounts to a simple restriction to the flow powering the AFC. You need flow, in order to use a portion of it, and waste the balance.

NOTE: If you're running twins and are pondering going this route, consider simply powering the AFC directly from the Primary. Rounding things off substantially, it represents about 1/2 that seen at the intake-log (Secondary output).
Ok so I understand the concept I just don't understand why I need an elbow with an adjustable max. As long as I'm slowing down the flow to the AFC by half the flow why does it matter what the max is regulated at?

What elbow are you running? I assume its like a manual boost controller with an adjustable bleed vent?

Also im running a s363 single 63/68/12 so I should be ok. I just want to cut down on low to mid smoke and speed up my spool
Old 07-18-2016, 06:21 PM
  #49  
1st Generation Admin
Thread Starter
 
BC847's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Buies Creek, NC
Posts: 4,597
Received 111 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by Gizmo52
Ok so I understand the concept I just don't understand why I need an elbow with an adjustable max. As long as I'm slowing down the flow to the AFC by half the flow why does it matter what the max is regulated at?
In that context, it's assumed you're on your way to full throttle. In that sense, yes, simply delaying the signal is good enough.

But what if you're at part-throttle. In that sense, simply restricting (delaying the full signal) is not accomplishing what you set out to do.

At part-throttle, you need a part-throttle AFC function.
Old 07-18-2016, 08:51 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
mknittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 4,918
Received 600 Likes on 437 Posts
Originally Posted by Gizmo52
Ok so I understand the concept I just don't understand why I need an elbow with an adjustable max. As long as I'm slowing down the flow to the AFC by half the flow why does it matter what the max is regulated at?

What elbow are you running? I assume its like a manual boost controller with an adjustable bleed vent?

Also im running a s363 single 63/68/12 so I should be ok. I just want to cut down on low to mid smoke and speed up my spool
This thread goes in that direction.
https://www.dieseltruckresource.com/...pgrade-323995/
Old 07-18-2016, 10:09 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
Gizmo52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by BC847
In that context, it's assumed you're on your way to full throttle. In that sense, yes, simply delaying the signal is good enough.

But what if you're at part-throttle. In that sense, simply restricting (delaying the full signal) is not accomplishing what you set out to do.

At part-throttle, you need a part-throttle AFC function.
Ok wow not that makes total sense! Only thing I don't understand is I just made and adjustable boost elbow type like I was talking about before you brought up the MBC with the bleed off valve and I somehow gained like 10 psi of boost?!
Old 07-21-2016, 10:06 AM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Gizmo52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Could a small boost leak at the AFC line cause me to go from 45psi at wot in fourth gear to 55 psi? Or is the engine now burning the fuel better with the adjustable boost elbow half shut?
Old 07-21-2016, 10:18 AM
  #53  
Registered User
 
oliver foster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: vermont
Posts: 6,335
Received 2,385 Likes on 1,575 Posts
55 PSI!
How do you have your injection pump tuned?
Are you using head studs?
Old 07-21-2016, 11:40 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
Gizmo52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by oliver foster
55 PSI!
How do you have your injection pump tuned?
Are you using head studs?
I machined my own pin kinda like the m5 pin from m&h, got the m&h timing spacer, I'm at about 18.5* timing, smoke screw all the way out, star wheel all the way up, 3800 gov spring, 5x.014 injectors, mighty diesel head bolts, 3" crossover tube (non ic), Borg warner s363 (63/68/12), banjo bolts modded in my fuel lines, 60# valve springs, ported and polished my head and manifold, high idle screw removed, 4" straight pipe, Valair 600hp 1100tq clutch

Still no fuel system, in the process of making my water meth kit and traction bars. Axle shafts will be here Monday so I can put my posi in.
Old 07-22-2016, 07:45 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
mknittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 4,918
Received 600 Likes on 437 Posts
Originally Posted by Gizmo52
I machined my own pin kinda like the m5 pin from m&h, got the m&h timing spacer, I'm at about 18.5* timing, smoke screw all the way out, star wheel all the way up, 3800 gov spring, 5x.014 injectors, mighty diesel head bolts, 3" crossover tube (non ic), Borg warner s363 (63/68/12), banjo bolts modded in my fuel lines, 60# valve springs, ported and polished my head and manifold, high idle screw removed, 4" straight pipe, Valair 600hp 1100tq clutch

Still no fuel system, in the process of making my water meth kit and traction bars. Axle shafts will be here Monday so I can put my posi in.
I want to see some. pictures of your truck.
Old 07-28-2016, 12:16 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
Gizmo52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by mknittle
I want to see some. pictures of your truck.
Sorry been busy lately but here's some pics of the engine bay fuel pin and truck. Got my posi in finally too






Old 07-28-2016, 09:13 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
ofelas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Outdoors
Posts: 541
Received 86 Likes on 70 Posts
Gizmo - very nice !
Old 09-03-2016, 06:49 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
93D250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 68
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This is what I came up with, not sure how it will work; I haven't tried it yet. Basically it's a needle and seat with an adjustable bleed right off the AFC top. There are 2 .045 holes between the needle/seat and locknut. Also machined the top so the fuel pin gets full travel. I'll report back here how it works but technically one could put a boost elbow off ebay etc in the same spot...

Made on a garage size small lathe.



Name:  20160903_113311.jpg
Views: 369
Size:  302.0 KB




Name:  20160903_112635.jpg
Views: 351
Size:  463.2 KB




Name:  20160903_112510.jpg
Views: 351
Size:  297.6 KB




Name:  20160903_111603.jpg
Views: 348
Size:  318.8 KB


Name:  20160903_111509.jpg
Views: 354
Size:  397.2 KB


Name:  20160903_111431.jpg
Views: 376
Size:  380.0 KB
Old 09-03-2016, 07:56 PM
  #59  
1st Generation Admin
Thread Starter
 
BC847's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Buies Creek, NC
Posts: 4,597
Received 111 Likes on 57 Posts
NICE!

You might now consider doing something similar with the boost reference line that feeds the AFC. The end result would have you be able to control the ramp (if you will) of the AFC via the gizmo shown above. A restriction in the feed-line would make it so the feed-line can't overwhelm your gizmo.

Make sense?
The following users liked this post:
93D250 (09-03-2016)
Old 09-03-2016, 08:31 PM
  #60  
Registered User
 
93D250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 68
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think replacing the oem hard line with nylon is a good idea in any case.

I started small with the bleed holes on the gizmo but they could be easily enlarged a lot to increase bleed. I definitely like your idea of a restrictor for the inlet line, the overall boost the diaphragm sees could then be limited. I think gizmo is a good name for this thing

Getting the thing to ramp right is probably going to take a lot of trial and error...


Quick Reply: So Why Can't I Put A Boost-Fooler On My AFC?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.