A question for the alpha welders out there!
#31
Administrator
Thread Starter
Curious to know if your turning it in due to the VW " We got caught" blunder/recall. I keep telling my wife, blunder or not, I would have still kept mine if I owned one of those ones that fell under the recall. Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm sure there are some aftermarket computer boxes out there that would de tune it to correctly pass smog, then I'd put it back to the finagled high output setting that VW had it at before they got caught. I've always wanted a diesel VW, for my Bay Area commute. Awesome vehicles.
The following users liked this post:
mknittle (03-07-2017)
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land of the Toxic Avenger
Posts: 6,769
Received 1,637 Likes
on
1,112 Posts
Thanks for the info Mark. I was just laying in my Jacuzzi tub down here in Mexico and I think that the hot water stimulated blood flow to my crusty old brain. I had an epiphany, there are many old wrecking yards down here with many old Dodges. I even bought the hood ornament off of an old Ram Charger, that was surrounded by other Ram Chargers. Soooooo, I think that I'ma gonna' go junkin' . I have to turn my VW in, on April 1st so I have some time to track some down. Heck, If I find enough of them, I may make these not so rare. Mark, I have a high quality brake line flaring kit, do you think that an o-ring setup could just be double flared? Thanks a million guys ...Mark
Not like that's anything new.......
The following users liked this post:
mknittle (03-07-2017)
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land of the Toxic Avenger
Posts: 6,769
Received 1,637 Likes
on
1,112 Posts
My Sister in law's sister has one of the recalled vw's. They LOVE IT.
they were looking at the offers to "repair" the issue, or take their money back. They really just want to keep the car, but I think it's going back to vw. The biggest issue is that the emissions, when fixed properly, will significantly reduce the fuel mileage that they're currently getting, which is in the 40 mpg range. Whether or not VW lied to anyone or not is not the thing that most of the folks I've spoken with up here are worried about. It's more the 1/3 loss in fuel economy, which is why they're being turned in.
Really silly, if you ask me, all the emission control problems these companies have to deal with and the inherent loss of fuel mileage associated with these contraptions installed in them. The gubberment says we want less emissions released, but as a trade off you have to buy a whole lot more fuel to keep them on the roads, as they're not going to run as good as without them. This makes the fuel companies happy, I'm sure, tax revenue is higher, and the little guy has less money in his pocket. Win, win, lose..
My fuso has no real emissions stuff on it, as it was the last year produced before class 8 trucks were required to do so. It runs great. It gets 10-12 mpg for a 14k box truck. It has almost no smell to the exhaust unless it's just started on a cold day until it warms up, then again. No smell. It never ever smokes, even on startup during cold weather.
I know it's not all "smell", but this thing runs magnificent. I know guys who have the 08 and up of the same exact truck. They can't get over 8 mpg, and they're always in "regen" mode, which means they're pulled over on the side of the road burning fuel to clean out their converters / filters. I am so grateful that I didn't take the newer model that was on the lot when I bought this one...
they were looking at the offers to "repair" the issue, or take their money back. They really just want to keep the car, but I think it's going back to vw. The biggest issue is that the emissions, when fixed properly, will significantly reduce the fuel mileage that they're currently getting, which is in the 40 mpg range. Whether or not VW lied to anyone or not is not the thing that most of the folks I've spoken with up here are worried about. It's more the 1/3 loss in fuel economy, which is why they're being turned in.
Really silly, if you ask me, all the emission control problems these companies have to deal with and the inherent loss of fuel mileage associated with these contraptions installed in them. The gubberment says we want less emissions released, but as a trade off you have to buy a whole lot more fuel to keep them on the roads, as they're not going to run as good as without them. This makes the fuel companies happy, I'm sure, tax revenue is higher, and the little guy has less money in his pocket. Win, win, lose..
My fuso has no real emissions stuff on it, as it was the last year produced before class 8 trucks were required to do so. It runs great. It gets 10-12 mpg for a 14k box truck. It has almost no smell to the exhaust unless it's just started on a cold day until it warms up, then again. No smell. It never ever smokes, even on startup during cold weather.
I know it's not all "smell", but this thing runs magnificent. I know guys who have the 08 and up of the same exact truck. They can't get over 8 mpg, and they're always in "regen" mode, which means they're pulled over on the side of the road burning fuel to clean out their converters / filters. I am so grateful that I didn't take the newer model that was on the lot when I bought this one...
The following users liked this post:
oliver foster (03-07-2017)
#34
Administrator
Thread Starter
My Sister in law's sister has one of the recalled vw's. They LOVE IT.
they were looking at the offers to "repair" the issue, or take their money back. They really just want to keep the car, but I think it's going back to vw. The biggest issue is that the emissions, when fixed properly, will significantly reduce the fuel mileage that they're currently getting, which is in the 40 mpg range. Whether or not VW lied to anyone or not is not the thing that most of the folks I've spoken with up here are worried about. It's more the 1/3 loss in fuel economy, which is why they're being turned in.
Really silly, if you ask me, all the emission control problems these companies have to deal with and the inherent loss of fuel mileage associated with these contraptions installed in them. The gubberment says we want less emissions released, but as a trade off you have to buy a whole lot more fuel to keep them on the roads, as they're not going to run as good as without them. This makes the fuel companies happy, I'm sure, tax revenue is higher, and the little guy has less money in his pocket. Win, win, lose..
My fuso has no real emissions stuff on it, as it was the last year produced before class 8 trucks were required to do so. It runs great. It gets 10-12 mpg for a 14k box truck. It has almost no smell to the exhaust unless it's just started on a cold day until it warms up, then again. No smell. It never ever smokes, even on startup during cold weather.
I know it's not all "smell", but this thing runs magnificent. I know guys who have the 08 and up of the same exact truck. They can't get over 8 mpg, and they're always in "regen" mode, which means they're pulled over on the side of the road burning fuel to clean out their converters / filters. I am so grateful that I didn't take the newer model that was on the lot when I bought this one...
they were looking at the offers to "repair" the issue, or take their money back. They really just want to keep the car, but I think it's going back to vw. The biggest issue is that the emissions, when fixed properly, will significantly reduce the fuel mileage that they're currently getting, which is in the 40 mpg range. Whether or not VW lied to anyone or not is not the thing that most of the folks I've spoken with up here are worried about. It's more the 1/3 loss in fuel economy, which is why they're being turned in.
Really silly, if you ask me, all the emission control problems these companies have to deal with and the inherent loss of fuel mileage associated with these contraptions installed in them. The gubberment says we want less emissions released, but as a trade off you have to buy a whole lot more fuel to keep them on the roads, as they're not going to run as good as without them. This makes the fuel companies happy, I'm sure, tax revenue is higher, and the little guy has less money in his pocket. Win, win, lose..
My fuso has no real emissions stuff on it, as it was the last year produced before class 8 trucks were required to do so. It runs great. It gets 10-12 mpg for a 14k box truck. It has almost no smell to the exhaust unless it's just started on a cold day until it warms up, then again. No smell. It never ever smokes, even on startup during cold weather.
I know it's not all "smell", but this thing runs magnificent. I know guys who have the 08 and up of the same exact truck. They can't get over 8 mpg, and they're always in "regen" mode, which means they're pulled over on the side of the road burning fuel to clean out their converters / filters. I am so grateful that I didn't take the newer model that was on the lot when I bought this one...
Your in'laws can wait for the fix, get the fix, get the compensation, around 6 grand and a lifetime warranty on the work, not too bad. I like the car, but it is like I said above. Bosch is also going to pay me another 350 bucks, because they made the cheat software. They initially said that they told VW that the software is for testing only, but they sold them 11 million copies!!! Yikes, talk about a smoking gun. VW got away with it for 6 years (09-15) and got caught by a college class at the University of West Virginia. Like I said earlier, they cheated for 350 bucks a car, they deserve to have their PP's whacked and they did, over 29 Billion dollars, not counting loss of stock value. Don't feel sorry for them because the week that the story broke, they had just overtaken Toyota as the biggest, they slumped, but in January, they overtook them again. The last thing is, if the fix is so easy for the gen 2's & 3's, why didn't they just do it in the first place?...Mark
#36
Registered User
Seems to me changing the flow control valve is easier and faster. and get the hose that fits from a w100-300. It took me about 5 minutes to change the valve and half of that was cleaning the back of the pump reservoir just un screw the old one and screw the new/used one in. pump stays on the truck.
The following users liked this post:
maybe368 (03-08-2017)
#37
Administrator
Thread Starter
Seems to me changing the flow control valve is easier and faster. and get the hose that fits from a w100-300. It took me about 5 minutes to change the valve and half of that was cleaning the back of the pump reservoir just un screw the old one and screw the new/used one in. pump stays on the truck.
#38
Administrator
Curious to know if your turning it in due to the VW " We got caught" blunder/recall. I keep telling my wife, blunder or not, I would have still kept mine if I owned one of those ones that fell under the recall. Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm sure there are some aftermarket computer boxes out there that would de tune it to correctly pass smog, then I'd put it back to the finagled high output setting that VW had it at before they got caught. I've always wanted a diesel VW, for my Bay Area commute. Awesome vehicles.
You won't have a choice to not have it retrofitted, so the best thing they could have done is what they did.
The sad thing is the Passats didn't have the problem, all they would have had to do is use the same emissions scheme.
The following users liked this post:
maybe368 (03-08-2017)
#39
Administrator
My sister has a '12 Passat, they get 42-45 on the Hwy. and that thing is a hoot to drive....... They are very happy that it is not under the recall, because I think it would kill my sister to lose it. She is one that gets a new car every 3 years or so, the Passat has made it 5 years and she just laughs at me whenever I inquire when I can come pick up my "new" Passat.
#40
Administrator
Thread Starter
I'm pretty sure they will not spend the money to add the DEF system, so any patch fix they make will likely kill the mileage.
You won't have a choice to not have it retrofitted, so the best thing they could have done is what they did.
The sad thing is the Passats didn't have the problem, all they would have had to do is use the same emissions scheme.
You won't have a choice to not have it retrofitted, so the best thing they could have done is what they did.
The sad thing is the Passats didn't have the problem, all they would have had to do is use the same emissions scheme.
#41
Administrator
Thread Starter
If they did it correctly with the same DEF system they used on the Passats, both performance and mileage would not suffer. I am not sure they want to go that far though.
My sister has a '12 Passat, they get 42-45 on the Hwy. and that thing is a hoot to drive....... They are very happy that it is not under the recall, because I think it would kill my sister to lose it. She is one that gets a new car every 3 years or so, the Passat has made it 5 years and she just laughs at me whenever I inquire when I can come pick up my "new" Passat.
My sister has a '12 Passat, they get 42-45 on the Hwy. and that thing is a hoot to drive....... They are very happy that it is not under the recall, because I think it would kill my sister to lose it. She is one that gets a new car every 3 years or so, the Passat has made it 5 years and she just laughs at me whenever I inquire when I can come pick up my "new" Passat.
#42
Registered User
Thanks Mark. that does sound easy. Summit racing has them: https://www.summitracing.com/int/sea...ntrol-fittings. Do you happen to know the specs on the replacement?...Mark
#43
Administrator
Thread Starter
It's pretty dirty, but...
So, I was walking down the street and I saw 1 of the hundreds of old Dodges. I assume that this is what I need...Mark
#44
Registered User
Nope. That is just a standard rotation 2wd steering box set up.
Which is the same as a 4x4 steering box without the steering plate you are trying to "steer" away from.
Looks for a '72-'76 Dodge with a huge mounting plate and a "push / pull" style pitman arm.
Which is the same as a 4x4 steering box without the steering plate you are trying to "steer" away from.
Looks for a '72-'76 Dodge with a huge mounting plate and a "push / pull" style pitman arm.
#45
Administrator
Thread Starter
Thanks Oliver, you are of coures absolutely right, , it looks just like mine. I would blame all the alcohol, but I don't drink. I have no excuse...Mark