Project 6.1 Cummins
#31
Registered User
After further review, I have done more research and have come to the conclusion that 14-15,000 psi is not enough. my research shows that the injection pressure of the VE is factory set at 17,000 PSI. while the Bosch P7100 is 18,000 PSI. I belevie that the reason people can make more power with the p-pump is due to the higher injection pressure and better atomized fuel. So my new target range for injection pressure is around 18-19,000 psi. I personally don't believe this will have an affect on the injection lines. With the stock first gen injection lines will hold more pressure than the second gen due to surface area. The inside diameter of the first gen cummins lines are smaller than the second gen there fore able to withstand greater pressures.
fact: In order to make horses, you need fuel in quantity delivered to cylinder. It also has to be delivered frequently... 60 times per second per cylinder at 3600 rpm.
fact: fuel has mass and viscosity, both resist pumping effort, especially in the intake part of the pump. (filling a pump cylinder)
fact: A VE pump has one pumping cylinder, requiring 3600 strokes per second.
fact: A P pump has 6 pumping cylinders, requiring 60 strokes per second per cylinder.
Most of us have fed big injectors with a VE. We've been able to deliver fuel, but a lot of it doesn't burn, indicating low actual injection event pressures.
The problem is that the VE is just too busy to get that much work done.
I don't think you can achieve your goals with the VE. You might get pretty close with a P pump, but to get truly large volume high pressure injection events, you'll have to go common rail.
Don't get me wrong. For moderate power production, plenty for towing and even goofing around wasting tires, the VE is up to the task. It's also relatively easy and cheap to service, as are the injectors, making experimenting affordable.
just my humble geriatric opinion.
#32
Good day, Levi:
You have a first gen, and part of being considered an legit part of the "first gen" crowd whilst entering the dyno wars etc, is sticking to a VE. More than once in this thread, the advice has been to"step up" to a common rail. Well let me tell you this, a lot of the common rail people want to step down to a mechanical pump, myself included.
For higher displacement VE applications, check out this thread:
VE 6.7 conversion - Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together
What you will see is that with the bigger 6.7L displacement and the higher flow 24V VP Head and HE351VE/CW turbo, you will have a very responsive and reliable diesel motor that not many are doing.
If you start with a core 6.7 block, you don't have to mess with crank grinds for clearing the 5.9 block nor custom rods and pistons due to side load concerns.
Unsolicited advice I know, but get your core big displacement motor build done and running with a VE first, and THEN focus on upping the VE fueling/tuning as you drive and test. The VE is put on many applications, even as recent as 10 years ago on agricultural versions of a 6.7L Cummins among tons of other applications over the past 30+ years. I'm sure there is a lot of reading to do to catch up with what has already been done and might help steer you in the right direction when the time comes to bomb and push the VE to the most reliable limit.
Also, going back to the common rail suggestions - I don't suggest it. I "stepped up" to a common rail after 10 years and more than my share of first gen VE trucks, and well, I'm still not completely happy with the joystick control of the motor. (read Lag) I want a stainless steel cable pulling a mechanical lever on an injection pump.
You have a first gen, and part of being considered an legit part of the "first gen" crowd whilst entering the dyno wars etc, is sticking to a VE. More than once in this thread, the advice has been to"step up" to a common rail. Well let me tell you this, a lot of the common rail people want to step down to a mechanical pump, myself included.
For higher displacement VE applications, check out this thread:
VE 6.7 conversion - Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together
What you will see is that with the bigger 6.7L displacement and the higher flow 24V VP Head and HE351VE/CW turbo, you will have a very responsive and reliable diesel motor that not many are doing.
If you start with a core 6.7 block, you don't have to mess with crank grinds for clearing the 5.9 block nor custom rods and pistons due to side load concerns.
Unsolicited advice I know, but get your core big displacement motor build done and running with a VE first, and THEN focus on upping the VE fueling/tuning as you drive and test. The VE is put on many applications, even as recent as 10 years ago on agricultural versions of a 6.7L Cummins among tons of other applications over the past 30+ years. I'm sure there is a lot of reading to do to catch up with what has already been done and might help steer you in the right direction when the time comes to bomb and push the VE to the most reliable limit.
Also, going back to the common rail suggestions - I don't suggest it. I "stepped up" to a common rail after 10 years and more than my share of first gen VE trucks, and well, I'm still not completely happy with the joystick control of the motor. (read Lag) I want a stainless steel cable pulling a mechanical lever on an injection pump.
#33
Registered User
I think I see the flaw in your design......if I may. I don't have the calcs, but I do have some experience in fluid dynamics. Used to design glycooler run around heat recovery systems.
fact: In order to make horses, you need fuel in quantity delivered to cylinder. It also has to be delivered frequently... 60 times per second per cylinder at 3600 rpm.
fact: fuel has mass and viscosity, both resist pumping effort, especially in the intake part of the pump. (filling a pump cylinder)
fact: A VE pump has one pumping cylinder, requiring 3600 strokes per second.
fact: A P pump has 6 pumping cylinders, requiring 60 strokes per second per cylinder.
Most of us have fed big injectors with a VE. We've been able to deliver fuel, but a lot of it doesn't burn, indicating low actual injection event pressures.
The problem is that the VE is just too busy to get that much work done.
I don't think you can achieve your goals with the VE. You might get pretty close with a P pump, but to get truly large volume high pressure injection events, you'll have to go common rail.
Don't get me wrong. For moderate power production, plenty for towing and even goofing around wasting tires, the VE is up to the task. It's also relatively easy and cheap to service, as are the injectors, making experimenting affordable.
just my humble geriatric opinion.
fact: In order to make horses, you need fuel in quantity delivered to cylinder. It also has to be delivered frequently... 60 times per second per cylinder at 3600 rpm.
fact: fuel has mass and viscosity, both resist pumping effort, especially in the intake part of the pump. (filling a pump cylinder)
fact: A VE pump has one pumping cylinder, requiring 3600 strokes per second.
fact: A P pump has 6 pumping cylinders, requiring 60 strokes per second per cylinder.
Most of us have fed big injectors with a VE. We've been able to deliver fuel, but a lot of it doesn't burn, indicating low actual injection event pressures.
The problem is that the VE is just too busy to get that much work done.
I don't think you can achieve your goals with the VE. You might get pretty close with a P pump, but to get truly large volume high pressure injection events, you'll have to go common rail.
Don't get me wrong. For moderate power production, plenty for towing and even goofing around wasting tires, the VE is up to the task. It's also relatively easy and cheap to service, as are the injectors, making experimenting affordable.
just my humble geriatric opinion.
#34
Registered User
The principle is still the same, just not as extreme. 6 times the events.
That said, I will admit folks have gotten some extreme performance out of the venerable VE. Like others have said, you have to wonder about reliability though. It's plenty of pump for anything I'd want to drive and buy fuel for.
#35
Registered User
Good day, Levi:
You have a first gen, and part of being considered an legit part of the "first gen" crowd whilst entering the dyno wars etc, is sticking to a VE. More than once in this thread, the advice has been to"step up" to a common rail. Well let me tell you this, a lot of the common rail people want to step down to a mechanical pump, myself included.
For higher displacement VE applications, check out this thread:
VE 6.7 conversion - Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together
What you will see is that with the bigger 6.7L displacement and the higher flow 24V VP Head and HE351VE/CW turbo, you will have a very responsive and reliable diesel motor that not many are doing.
If you start with a core 6.7 block, you don't have to mess with crank grinds for clearing the 5.9 block nor custom rods and pistons due to side load concerns.
Unsolicited advice I know, but get your core big displacement motor build done and running with a VE first, and THEN focus on upping the VE fueling/tuning as you drive and test. The VE is put on many applications, even as recent as 10 years ago on agricultural versions of a 6.7L Cummins among tons of other applications over the past 30+ years. I'm sure there is a lot of reading to do to catch up with what has already been done and might help steer you in the right direction when the time comes to bomb and push the VE to the most reliable limit.
Also, going back to the common rail suggestions - I don't suggest it. I "stepped up" to a common rail after 10 years and more than my share of first gen VE trucks, and well, I'm still not completely happy with the joystick control of the motor. (read Lag) I want a stainless steel cable pulling a mechanical lever on an injection pump.
You have a first gen, and part of being considered an legit part of the "first gen" crowd whilst entering the dyno wars etc, is sticking to a VE. More than once in this thread, the advice has been to"step up" to a common rail. Well let me tell you this, a lot of the common rail people want to step down to a mechanical pump, myself included.
For higher displacement VE applications, check out this thread:
VE 6.7 conversion - Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together
What you will see is that with the bigger 6.7L displacement and the higher flow 24V VP Head and HE351VE/CW turbo, you will have a very responsive and reliable diesel motor that not many are doing.
If you start with a core 6.7 block, you don't have to mess with crank grinds for clearing the 5.9 block nor custom rods and pistons due to side load concerns.
Unsolicited advice I know, but get your core big displacement motor build done and running with a VE first, and THEN focus on upping the VE fueling/tuning as you drive and test. The VE is put on many applications, even as recent as 10 years ago on agricultural versions of a 6.7L Cummins among tons of other applications over the past 30+ years. I'm sure there is a lot of reading to do to catch up with what has already been done and might help steer you in the right direction when the time comes to bomb and push the VE to the most reliable limit.
Also, going back to the common rail suggestions - I don't suggest it. I "stepped up" to a common rail after 10 years and more than my share of first gen VE trucks, and well, I'm still not completely happy with the joystick control of the motor. (read Lag) I want a stainless steel cable pulling a mechanical lever on an injection pump.
such a cool build... I wonder if the extra displacement makes much more power. If I had money to burn I'd love to do something like this. Or alternatively, I'd love to be the guy to tune that guys afc and set his pump up. I think I could do well making it pretty smoke free and squeezing all the power out of it as possible.
#36
Registered User
J/K - I'm just dumbfounded by your crappy luck.
#37
Registered User
I don't even understand my luck with motors... It's not even just my motor. It seems everything the last year turns sour on me in all areas of my life
Ah well, that's how she goes I guess.
#38
Administrator
I went for quite a while killing big block Chevys...... Then poof, like magic even junkyard builds done on the garage floor didn't come apart at 6500.....
I guess the old adage of sometimes the Gods require blood is true.
#39
Registered User
Thread Starter
Update!!!
I bought a 24 valve block head combo. I have it all torn apart. waiting to find a few more parts like the 6.7 crankshaft. also im still confused as to what would be a good compound turbo set up for a 6.1L Cummins in the low rpm ranges... im almost thinking a stock hx-35 and an ATS Aurora 3000? The Ats 3000 is good to 600 hp I believe.
I bought a 24 valve block head combo. I have it all torn apart. waiting to find a few more parts like the 6.7 crankshaft. also im still confused as to what would be a good compound turbo set up for a 6.1L Cummins in the low rpm ranges... im almost thinking a stock hx-35 and an ATS Aurora 3000? The Ats 3000 is good to 600 hp I believe.
#40
Registered User
Update!!!
I bought a 24 valve block head combo. I have it all torn apart. waiting to find a few more parts like the 6.7 crankshaft. also im still confused as to what would be a good compound turbo set up for a 6.1L Cummins in the low rpm ranges... im almost thinking a stock hx-35 and an ATS Aurora 3000? The Ats 3000 is good to 600 hp I believe.
I bought a 24 valve block head combo. I have it all torn apart. waiting to find a few more parts like the 6.7 crankshaft. also im still confused as to what would be a good compound turbo set up for a 6.1L Cummins in the low rpm ranges... im almost thinking a stock hx-35 and an ATS Aurora 3000? The Ats 3000 is good to 600 hp I believe.
I bet an HE351CW over something like an S472 would spool lightning fast and light quick on a 6.1L engine.
#41
Registered User
Update!!!
I bought a 24 valve block head combo. I have it all torn apart. waiting to find a few more parts like the 6.7 crankshaft. also im still confused as to what would be a good compound turbo set up for a 6.1L Cummins in the low rpm ranges... im almost thinking a stock hx-35 and an ATS Aurora 3000? The Ats 3000 is good to 600 hp I believe.
I bought a 24 valve block head combo. I have it all torn apart. waiting to find a few more parts like the 6.7 crankshaft. also im still confused as to what would be a good compound turbo set up for a 6.1L Cummins in the low rpm ranges... im almost thinking a stock hx-35 and an ATS Aurora 3000? The Ats 3000 is good to 600 hp I believe.
As an aside, if you go .040" pistons with stock bottom end of the 5.9 it is essentially a 6.0l with the added displacement of boring it. You gain 7 or 8 cubic inches total by boring the motor 0.040" over. The extra displacement is still fairly inconsequential regardless.
Obviously, it's just an opinion but I think for simplicity (and there's still a cool factor because so few have done it) you should just VE pump that 24V motor. It actually wouldn't be hard to do at all. All you really need is custom injector lines I think. Run the 24v block, head, pistons, injectors (set to VE pop pressures). Food for thought anyway.
When I was building my motor I had entertained the idea of building a 24v VE or ppump motor. It would be a nice setup.
#42
Registered User
the a3000 is almost the same size as an hx35. It is a terrible match with an hx35 in a compound setup. An s472 or a5k would be alright in a set of compounds with an hx35. the a4000 is also not a good primary turbo, it's ok as a secondary with an external wastegate if you have really high hp goals
As an aside, if you go .040" pistons with stock bottom end of the 5.9 it is essentially a 6.0l with the added displacement of boring it. You gain 7 or 8 cubic inches total by boring the motor 0.040" over. The extra displacement is still fairly inconsequential regardless.
Obviously, it's just an opinion but I think for simplicity (and there's still a cool factor because so few have done it) you should just VE pump that 24V motor. It actually wouldn't be hard to do at all. All you really need is custom injector lines I think. Run the 24v block, head, pistons, injectors (set to VE pop pressures). Food for thought anyway.
When I was building my motor I had entertained the idea of building a 24v VE or ppump motor. It would be a nice setup.
As an aside, if you go .040" pistons with stock bottom end of the 5.9 it is essentially a 6.0l with the added displacement of boring it. You gain 7 or 8 cubic inches total by boring the motor 0.040" over. The extra displacement is still fairly inconsequential regardless.
Obviously, it's just an opinion but I think for simplicity (and there's still a cool factor because so few have done it) you should just VE pump that 24V motor. It actually wouldn't be hard to do at all. All you really need is custom injector lines I think. Run the 24v block, head, pistons, injectors (set to VE pop pressures). Food for thought anyway.
When I was building my motor I had entertained the idea of building a 24v VE or ppump motor. It would be a nice setup.
https://www.belmetric.com/ts12151-m1...th=217_219_258
$11.64 vs whatever custom lines cost.
#43
Administrator
VP44 lines work with adapters - people use tread inserts.
https://www.belmetric.com/ts12151-m1...th=217_219_258
$11.64 vs whatever custom lines cost.
https://www.belmetric.com/ts12151-m1...th=217_219_258
$11.64 vs whatever custom lines cost.
We have used timesert repair parts, good stuff for when you don't have room for Jergens...... They should work like a champ as an adapter.
#44
Registered User
VP44 lines work with adapters - people use tread inserts.
https://www.belmetric.com/ts12151-m1...th=217_219_258
$11.64 vs whatever custom lines cost.
https://www.belmetric.com/ts12151-m1...th=217_219_258
$11.64 vs whatever custom lines cost.
I think custom injector lines are not that expensive actually. Just read on CF someone gets ppump custom lines for like $60 out of the UK for this builds.