1st Gen. Ram - All Topics Discussion for all Dodge Rams prior to 1994. This includes engine, drivetrain and non-drivetrain discussions. Anything prior to 1994 should go in here.

Fuel Vs. Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2017, 10:53 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
j.fonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 884
Received 93 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by ofelas
I don't understand the math. Subscribed.
1/ Why a blanket 5% for head porting?
2/ Why does porting the head make my VE pump 5% better?
3/ How can I make my VE pump 100%?
Because that's what flatbed decided... his world, I'm just mathing in it.
Old 01-01-2017, 11:01 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
93flatbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,778
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
5% gain in VE isn't just for head porting. VE rises with the more air you cram in, (or at least that's how I read it on many sites, the performance section of the Garrett site being the main one I've read). Since none of us are going to pay the money to have our poor flowing heads flowed on a bench the 5% was just a general for rise in boost. If you read some places assume close to 92%VE which would probably be a good assumption for a new style diesel engine but I doubt any of us would reach that much efficacy.
Old 01-01-2017, 04:51 PM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
93flatbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,778
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by j.fonder
agreed. but since i know the stock injectors are ~40LPM air, we'll use air for this theoretical comparison.

if we use 18psi as our baseline boost number, because thats what most stock trucks will give you. heres what we come up with

[(18psi+14.7) / 14.7] x 5.9L = ~800 c.i.

so we can say that stock 40 LPM injectors will fuel the stock 800 c.i.

now for your massive air pump

[(55psi+14.7) / 14.7] x 5.9L = ~1707 ci.

thats 2.13x the cubes

so 40 LPM x 2.13 = 85.2

so i could theoretically say that as long as fuel supply is there, meaning you don't suck your A1000 lift pump and Giles IP dry, 85 LPM injectors would fuel your 1707 CI.

as previously stated, this is by no means a scientific way of determining injector size. just a fun, theoretical convo.

Why did you add an atmosphere to the boost #? Not saying its wrong but I don't understand, shouldn't we assume the 360 already has the atmosphere in it? I could be very wrong here but how I was trying to figure it using your example is; 18/14.7=1.22. 1.22X360=440ci. Factor in our VE of .7 our 440=308 CI.

I'll also note I'm hoping my A1K can keep the pump feed. It's a big **** lift pump. AN10 lines are freaking huge too!!!
Old 01-01-2017, 04:55 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
j.fonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 884
Received 93 Likes on 73 Posts
In my example, I didn't have to multiply by .7 for VE because it was already factored in by the fact we were using a stock 65% VE to begin with. I did correct myself and factored in the +5% VE as per your s.w.a.g.
Old 01-01-2017, 04:57 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
j.fonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 884
Received 93 Likes on 73 Posts
And I "added" the atmosphere to the equation because that's the equation. I didn't write it, I just plugged in our numbers. Mathing

1 psi is 1 psi above atmospheric pressure(14.7)

Therefore 1 + 14.7 = 1 psi of boost.
Old 01-01-2017, 07:10 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
j.fonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 884
Received 93 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by j.fonder
agreed. but since i know the stock injectors are ~40LPM air, we'll use air for this theoretical comparison.

if we use 18psi as our baseline boost number, because thats what most stock trucks will give you. heres what we come up with

[(18psi+14.7) / 14.7] x 5.9L = ~800 c.i.

so we can say that stock 40 LPM injectors will fuel the stock 800 c.i.

now for your massive air pump

[(55psi+14.7) / 14.7] x 5.9L = ~1707 ci.

thats 2.13x the cubes

so 40 LPM x 2.13 = 85.2

so i could theoretically say that as long as fuel supply is there, meaning you don't suck your A1000 lift pump and Giles IP dry, 85 LPM injectors would fuel your 1707 CI.

as previously stated, this is by no means a scientific way of determining injector size. just a fun, theoretical convo.
ok, let me rework this with the VE numbers.

[(18psi+14.7) / 14.7] x 5.9L = 800 c.i.

800 ci x .65 = 520 ci.

so we can say that stock 40 LPM injectors will fuel the stock 520 c.i.

now for your massive air pump

[(55psi+14.7) / 14.7] x 5.9L = 1707 ci.

1707 x .70 = 1195 ci

so thats 2.3x the cubes from stock

so 40 LPM x 2.3 = 92 LPM
Old 01-18-2017, 08:17 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
j.fonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 884
Received 93 Likes on 73 Posts
bringing this one back from the dead as i'm feeling nerdy this morning.

so been doing some CFM calculations. we'll use your 1195 ci motor, 55 psi, 2500 rpm as our test bed.

(1195ci x 2500rpm x 0.5 x 0.70)/1728 = 605 cfm air demand.
Old 01-18-2017, 01:22 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
j.fonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 884
Received 93 Likes on 73 Posts
and now to throw a total wrench into the mix is increased VE due to boost. so i found a "standard" equation to convert from NA VE to boosted VE.

so if 65% VE NA our little tractor motor would be at 165% VE @ 55 psi.

this is where head work really impacts power. increasing the VE through cylinder head porting. was talking with Mark Wilson at dieseltuff about boost and how we often look at it as power. it's really just a measure of restriction. better flow, less restriction, more efficient. think same power/flow/VE at lower boost.
Old 01-21-2017, 06:01 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
ofelas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Outdoors
Posts: 541
Received 86 Likes on 70 Posts
That's part of the reason why Scheid got around 1100hp with just 40psi boost.
The following users liked this post:
mknittle (01-21-2017)
Old 01-21-2017, 07:26 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
mknittle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 4,918
Received 600 Likes on 437 Posts
Think of it as an air pump the better the flow the easier to make power. same as a hotrod gasser.
Old 01-24-2017, 11:24 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
JQmile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Lot of interesting maths floating around in here The way I see it, projected horsepower is the way to size everything, whether you're 359cid or 1100cid.
Old 01-25-2017, 05:34 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
j.fonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 884
Received 93 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by JQmile
Lot of interesting maths floating around in here The way I see it, projected horsepower is the way to size everything, whether you're 359cid or 1100cid.
I agree, but I think the maths here was more about getting to that number in the most efficient manner or in optimizing an already owned setup or verifying the efficiency/sufficiency of a setup. That or I was just real bored.

I'll just be over here in my corner with my holset turbo and Ve pump, hahaha.
Old 02-05-2017, 05:59 PM
  #28  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
93flatbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,778
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
Like to see this got a bit of traction. Let's bump this up and see if anyone else has some input, I really don't know if there's a wrong answer. Gents and ladies this is how we come to conclusions, don't be scared of posting!
Old 04-21-2017, 10:26 PM
  #29  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
93flatbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,778
Received 23 Likes on 15 Posts
T.o.p.
Old 04-21-2017, 11:31 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
ofelas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Outdoors
Posts: 541
Received 86 Likes on 70 Posts
I'm not sure there are any big hp VE folks on here anymore.


Quick Reply: Fuel Vs. Air



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.