Go Back   Dodge Diesel - Diesel Truck Resource Forums > General > General Diesel Discussion > Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices
Register FAQ DTR Store Members List Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-18-2005, 01:02 PM   #1
Mexstan
Registered User
 
Mexstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central Mexico
Posts: 2,014
Could this cause a problem for future biodiesel production?

Biofuels a net drain on energy, study says

By Mark Johnson
The Associated Press
July 18, 2005

ALBANY, N.Y. — Farmers, businesses and state officials are investing millions of dollars in ethanol and biofuel plants as renewable-energy sources, but a new study says the alternative fuels burn more energy than they produce.

Supporters of ethanol and other biofuels contend they burn cleaner than fossil fuels, reduce U.S. dependence on oil and give farmers another market to sell their produce.

But researchers at Cornell University and the University of California, Berkeley say it takes 29 percent more fossil energy to turn corn into ethanol than the amount of fuel the process produces. For switch grass, a warm-weather perennial grass found in the Great Plains and eastern North America, it takes 45 percent more energy and for wood, 57 percent.

It takes 27 percent more energy to turn soybeans into biodiesel fuel and more than double the energy produced is needed to do the same to sunflower plants, the study found.

"Ethanol production in the United States does not benefit the nation's energy security, its agriculture, the economy, or the environment," according to the study by Cornell's David Pimentel and Berkeley's Tad Patzek. They conclude the country would be better off investing in solar, wind and hydrogen energy.

The researchers included such factors as the energy used in producing the crop, costs that were not used in other studies that supported ethanol production, Pimentel said.

The study also omitted $3 billion in state- and federal-government subsidies that go toward ethanol production the United States each year, payments that mask the true costs, Pimentel said.

Ethanol is an additive blended with gasoline to reduce auto emissions and increase gasoline's octane levels. Its use has grown rapidly since 2004, when the federal government banned the use of the additive MTBE to enhance the cleaner burning of fuel. About 3.6 billion gallons of ethanol were produced last year in the United States, according to the Renewable Fuels Association, an ethanol trade group.

The ethanol industry claims that using 8 billion gallons of ethanol a year will allow refiners to use 2 billion fewer barrels of oil. The oil industry disputes that, saying the ethanol mandate would have negligible impact on oil imports.

Ethanol producers dispute the new study, saying the data are outdated and don't take into account profits that offset costs.
__________________
2003 Light Almond 2500 QC SLT, HO, six speed, 4x4, premium cloth, tow package, fold flat floor, 3.73 anti-spin, keyless entry, chrome Mopar nerf bars, rear slider, Rhino liner, immobalizer, Mopar mud flaps, BD short shift, ultrasonic backup system, Scotty 3 airfilter, Diprocal gauges, Jordan Brake, Icom 2/440m. 315 Yokahoma tires, Pacbrake, Carli suspension, on board air, Road Armor bumper, Dynatrac hubs. MM 12k hydraulic winch, Airdog FP-100
Mexstan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 01:06 PM   #2
Redleg
Registered User
 
Redleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bristol Michigan
Posts: 1,710
Maybe if the equipment used for production was converted from petro to bio....
__________________
MIDTR

90 W350, flat bed, xtra leaf all around, Jasper 3spd auto, 16cm housing, tampered pump, Isspro pyro/boost, piller pod, BHAF, 93 radiator mod, Superwinch lockouts, Moog, 2nd D70.

The number you have dialed, 9-1-1, has been changed... to an unlisted number.

Freedom is everybody's job!
Redleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 03:13 PM   #3
trailblazenyj
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ft. Oglethorpe, GA
Posts: 196
I agree with Redleg. The farmers that I have talked to said their first order of business is to get fuel back to their farm. I think the study probably assumes only petro products to run the farm equipment and the trucks to get the bio to the pumps.
__________________
His: 2003 QC SLT LWB, 5.9 h.o. - 6 speed, autometer gauges, alpine radio and cd-changer; Ram Air 3
Hers: 2001 F-250 Crew Cab - 7.3 - auto, banks stinger and trans command, triple pod gauges.

Both trucks set up to tow our 31.5 laredo 5th and of course our jeeps.
trailblazenyj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 06:16 PM   #4
TomW
Registered User
 
TomW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 410
Not necessarily. I've also heard this from several individuals who work in the industry. Apparently it does require more energy to convert the natural oils into something combustable than dino oil.
__________________
When man talks to God, it is called prayer. When God talks to man , it is called Scizophrenia.
TomW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 07:10 PM   #5
bigfoot
Urban Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cleburne TX
Posts: 301
Three questions
1Who paid for the study?
2 Did the collages have anything to gain if they had came to another conclusion?
3 What did the collages gain by coming to the conclusion that they came to?
__________________
Dodge 2009 3500 with training wheels ,quad cab
6SP trans, 3:73 ,Jacobs E brake, 100% stock.

.
bigfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 07:25 PM   #6
dspencer
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: metroplex Tx
Posts: 130
I would like to see a study specifically dealing with biodiesel rather than a study that just mentions it. Do you notice that they refer mostly to ethanol production. I would think that biodiesel would be much simpler and less costly to produce. Also, the study date may not include the double digit inflation that fuels are experiencing at this time.
Does anyone know when this study was made?

Joke.......this study is probably funded by someone from southeast of here.
__________________
2000 Dodge 2500 QC 5sp SLT long bed
134k in April 2007
F1 1.6 injectors EZ
Amsoil throughout
53 block not worried
308hp dynoed 4/21/07, will get better
dspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 08:11 PM   #7
TomW
Registered User
 
TomW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 410
From the DoE.

Quote:
Feedstock costs account for a large percentage of the direct biodiesel production costs, including capital cost and return. It takes about 7.3 pounds of soybean oil, which costs about 20 cents per pound, to produce a gallon of biodiesel. Feedstock costs alone, therefore, are at least $1.50 per gallon of soy biodiesel. Fats and greases cost less and produce less expensive biodiesel, sometimes as low as $1.00 per gallon. The quality of the fuel is equivalent to soy biodiesel fuel.
Start adding in the other costs such as distribution, etc. and it's easy to see why the costs go up.
TomW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 10:07 PM   #8
Begle1
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,451
That's interesting... If it takes more energy to make crops into biofuels than the biofuel produces, than it is absolutely end-of-discussion fatal to my views of the future...

So I'd like to think that this study is full of bull-thistles... Since it's from the same Berkely that thinks algae generates hydrogen more efficiently than hydrocarbons, I'd call that a valid scenario.

Although I still have yet to see a conclusive study on the oil-content of algae vs. corn vs. switchgrass vs. hemp vs. soybeans... Corn has never been the number-one candidate for ethanol production.
Begle1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 10:12 PM   #9
TomW
Registered User
 
TomW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 410
Part of the problem, too, is creating the refining facilities to do this. It's been a VERY long time since a new refinery was built because of the NIMBY's. I don't see this issue being resolved anytime soon, either.
TomW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 12:04 AM   #10
Haulin_in_Dixie
Registered User
 
Haulin_in_Dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Branchville, Alabama
Posts: 4,192
Energy is a general term on this subject. Where does this energy come from? If not from the mid east, do it to it. I would pay double for fuel if the country would tell the mid east what to lubericate with their oil.
__________________
99 2500 4X4 Laramie Quad cab ISB275 engine 660 tq stock with air comp, HX35/18.5, NV5600, 13.125 SBC, 354 posi, Rancho 9000, Scotty II, EZ, FASS, bottom feed, ported ATS ex man, Isspro gages, Truspeed, Ford dual wheels, Jorden, Alpine, amp, M15000 warn.

Freightliner Condo, N14 500hp.
Kaufman EZ loader VI car hauler
97 Dodge 2500, Club cab, 4wd, tow body, cow catcher, 12v, NV4500
Borne 50’ car hauler
53/102 Trailmobile Reefer
Haulin_in_Dixie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 01:11 AM   #11
Begle1
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,451
Quote:
Originally posted by Haulin_in_Dixie
Energy is a general term on this subject. Where does this energy come from? If not from the mid east, do it to it. I would pay double for fuel if the country would tell the mid east what to lubericate with their oil.
But what this study is saying is that harvesting switchgrass, corn or soybeans doesn't yield enough fuel to run the combine... So unless you get fuel for the combine from somewhere else, it ain't gonna happen.

So we need to find plants that make more geasy stuff and find cleaner ways to harvest it... I'm thinking algae, but nobody likes that idea but me...
(Well, the hydrogen guys like the algae idea, but they're hydrogen hippies, so we don't like them...)
Begle1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 02:08 AM   #12
Haulin_in_Dixie
Registered User
 
Haulin_in_Dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Branchville, Alabama
Posts: 4,192
I read an article, don't remember much about it. I was discribing a seaweed that could be grown all along the coasts with high oil production and little labor. The key was the large amount of oil per amount of seaweed.
Haulin_in_Dixie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 04:47 AM   #13
screaminbanana
Muted User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville MD
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally posted by Begle1
That's interesting... If it takes more energy to make crops into biofuels than the biofuel produces, than it is absolutely end-of-discussion fatal to my views of the future...

So I'd like to think that this study is full of bull-thistles... Since it's from the same Berkely that thinks algae generates hydrogen more efficiently than hydrocarbons, I'd call that a valid scenario.

Although I still have yet to see a conclusive study on the oil-content of algae vs. corn vs. switchgrass vs. hemp vs. soybeans... Corn has never been the number-one candidate for ethanol production.
http://www.ap.nic.in/nrcop/oilpalmglance.html

This is the best plant to go with for oil production. The oil palm produces the highest of oil of any plant I have found online.
__________________
Muted for having an invalid email address. Please change your profile, then let us know or contact us at webmaster@dieseltruckresource.com with a valid email address.
screaminbanana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 05:31 AM   #14
PistolWhipt
Registered User
 
PistolWhipt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 498
Send a message via AIM to PistolWhipt
Time to start harpooning whales again .... might get a tank or two each


HIDINGFROMPETAPISTOL
__________________
"B.E.R.T."
1999 Dodge Ram 4x4 Dually (SOLD)
"The TICK"
2008 SCREAMING YELLOW Toyota FJ Cruiser


Me mother was a mermaid, me father was King Neptune. I was born on the crest of a wave and rocked in the cradle of the deep. Seaweed and barnacles is me clothes. The hair on me head is hemp, every tooth in me head is a marlinespike, every bone in me body is a spar, and when I spits ... I spits tar. I's hard I is ... I am ... I aarrrrggghhh !!! US NAVY CHIEF PETTY OFFICER (RET)
PistolWhipt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2005, 05:54 AM   #15
j-fox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,691
Soy fuel and Ethanol are not economical to produce. This is info from those who want cheep food and low corn/beans prices.

How about keeping the growers in business without subsidies??
Produce the fuels fron crops till we can get the corn prices to $4.00 and beans to $12.00.
And by all means, grow alternative crops.

I doubt it will go very far with the oil companies as powerful as they are!!!

I am not a crop producer.
__________________
2002 4X4 2500 Atlantic blue Auto and 3.54 LS
Kodiak steps.
Smarty, TST PM 3
Mach 2 HP injectors, hx35/12 over a s-400 3 piece manifold , AFE, 4" exhaust and many DTT parts.
j-fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
Copyright 2003, DieselTruckResource.Com