Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

why 1:1 on the dyno?

Old 05-24-2005, 04:28 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
pmtg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why 1:1 on the dyno?

why do some recommend running the tranny in the 1:1 gear when dynoing? is it purely comparison reasons? something else im not thinking of at the moment?


thanks, Pat
Old 05-24-2005, 11:17 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
joefarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: stupid ohio
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1:1 doesn't have the parasitic losses that running most vehicles in overdrive has. However, on these trucks you're much better off in overdrive because it provides a load for the turbo to spool against. Back to back 4th and 5th gear runs displayed below graphically show the results:



brandon.
Old 05-25-2005, 08:32 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
RustyJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
On a Dynojet 246C (inertial dyno), I ran 320/650 in 5th (1:1) and 347/762 in 6th. Even in 6th, my 4.10 gears were a hindrance. The taller gearing in 6th means that rotational inertia of engine-speed-related components doesn't sap as much power from the rollers since the pull takes longer to make, and the turbo has more time to "get its shoulder under the load" and spool in the higher gear. Although no one would ever do it, think how the engine would dyno if you made a pull in 1st - it wouldn't even know the rollers were there!

Rusty
Old 05-25-2005, 09:11 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
pmtg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, i always thought the highest gear possible would be the best bet for the sake of loading the motor and spooling the turbo, atleast on diesels. my '02 made ~100 ft*lbs more torque in 6th vs. 5th.
Old 05-25-2005, 09:27 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
justinp20012500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by pgilles
yeah, i always thought the highest gear possible would be the best bet for the sake of loading the motor and spooling the turbo, atleast on diesels. my '02 made ~100 ft*lbs more torque in 6th vs. 5th.
Have you ever ran on a Mustang M250?

If you have under 1200 HP that dyno will bring your truck to its breaking point. I have seen a HT3B used as a single on a 12v and it spooled just fine.

If you run in anything but 1:1 on a M250 you will post lower numbers.
Old 05-25-2005, 09:35 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
RustyJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I believe the 1:1 might well be more efficient on a load dyno like the Mustang, but the highest gear possible seems to be more efficient on an inertial dyno like the Dynojet. Horses for courses........

Rusty
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jumper
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
14
04-15-2008 12:19 AM
sgrooms
Fuels / BioDiesel / Diesel Prices
21
04-08-2008 11:17 AM
steelblitzkrieg
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
16
05-24-2007 02:26 PM
Begle1
Other
57
09-12-2006 12:02 PM
rollsroyce1999
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
16
08-11-2006 07:42 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: why 1:1 on the dyno?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.