Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only Talk about Dodge/Cummins aftermarket products for second generation trucks here. Can include high-performance mods, or general accessories.

twin turbo alternative??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2009, 09:24 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
theonlyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
twin turbo alternative??

Just as it says....I am wondering what kind of turbo I can run other than my stock turbo? Currently I have just some stg 1 ddp injectors and with edge turned all the way up and the low end response all the way up and an intake and I smoke out a two lane road. I was going to run a small set of twins but, things are in the making for some change. I will be possibly picking up a CJ-7 jeep and restoring that, so money will go else where. On the other hand I would really like to clean up the exhaust smoke issue to.
Old 07-11-2009, 11:12 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
dieselman2300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful USA!
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
62/68/14 from Engineered diesel, with their race cover and super62 wheel with their wastegate actuator rod.
Tell them you want the same turbo they built Tony.(thats me)
http://www.engineereddiesel.com/

Its a good all around turbo thats not laggy.
If you ever do the twins this will fit perfect for a top turbo.

E.D.s prices are WAY cheaper than Hight Tech and Industrial Injection.
All these turbo shops do the same stuff, take off the shelf Borg Warner parts and put them together to make a turbo. NOTHING is custom.

I have had turbos from HTT and I.I.
E.D. gets my buisness from now on.
Old 07-11-2009, 11:41 PM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
theonlyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what kind of power can i expect to gain from this idea? Is what Im wanting to do worth it? Dont know much about turbos and I am wondering if its cost effective to do this?? I dont want to spend a ton of money to gain something like 20 hp. Some one school me.
Old 07-12-2009, 01:20 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
AlpineRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austria Europe
Posts: 3,733
Received 263 Likes on 235 Posts
If you have too much smoke coming off idle a bigger turbo won't help, it will make it worse.
Try to fiddle with the low boost settings until you are rid of the smoke and just get a haze at wot from the line.
You will need more go pedal, but have the same or more performance. Until you have the air (meaning boost) to burn the fuel, adding more fuel does not make more power.
In some cases it's a devil's circle. You are overfueled, need very little go pedal and the auto does an early upshift. So the rpm stay down, no exhaust volume, no spool on the turbo, you keep out of the pedal, and again an early upshift. Reducing low end fueling on the box makes you press the go pedal further, the tranny keeps in first a bit longer and the turbo has a chance to spool. Much better overall performance.

Just my2c

AlpineRAM
Old 07-12-2009, 04:54 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
dieselman2300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful USA!
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You have the ease of adjustability with your box.

IMO, you have WAY to much fuel for a stock turbo.

Like Alpine said, you need to get rid of the pre-boost fuel (fuel that dumps black exhaust before spoolup on the turbo)

As far as making horsepower, a 62 can make with the right fueling and tuning 500-550hp.
Old 07-12-2009, 07:46 AM
  #6  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
theonlyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so it sounds like twins are the only way to go then.
Old 07-12-2009, 11:11 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
AlpineRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austria Europe
Posts: 3,733
Received 263 Likes on 235 Posts
Oooops, didn't realize it is a 6spd....

Still, try to tune the low end fueling down to something reasonable, and let your truck rev enough to be in the turbo.
If you have sustained smoke under WOT from 2000 rpm you need an nice primary charger.(And your stocker, an external WG head studs, DD clutch, etc etc...)
Old 07-12-2009, 11:41 AM
  #8  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
theonlyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yay, there is just no cheap way of doing it i guess. Either like u said, turn the fuel down of feed it with twins and lots of money. Thanks for the input everyone.
Old 07-12-2009, 12:04 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
AlpineRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austria Europe
Posts: 3,733
Received 263 Likes on 235 Posts
Just to get rid of one misconception-
before you get to approx 5 psig on the stocker (bigger aftermarket turbos have higher numbers) you are below boost threshold- and after that when boost climbs really quickly you are in spool land.

What I see a lot is that folks get a bigger turbo, twins or whatever and are disappointed- because the new stuff will spool good or better than stock etc- but have a higher boost threshold, and make their truck worse off the line.
IMO for a daily driver a set of compounds with a secondary (maybe a VG turbo or a BB unit- or both) , a very big wastegate and a decent size primary is desirable.
In a race it's not the one with the most horsepower- it's the fastest who is going to win.

HTH

AlpineRAM
Old 07-12-2009, 04:00 PM
  #10  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
theonlyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what would be a good alternative for me if any?? I dont really tow but, I do enjoy boost and showing ricers up every now and again.
Old 07-12-2009, 07:06 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Tate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Posts: 7,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
62mm is a good all around turbo.

You will want to turn down your pre-boost fueling. The bigger turbo takes longer to spool up (or reach boost threshold, as it were), and overfueling it makes it worse. You will have to relearn how to drive it with a bigger turbo. Stabbing the pedal doesn't work nearly as well as it used to with the stocker.
Old 07-12-2009, 08:44 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
dieselman2300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful USA!
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by theonlyz
Yay, there is just no cheap way of doing it i guess. Either like u said, turn the fuel down of feed it with twins and lots of money. Thanks for the input everyone.
Not true!
You can build a set of twins for less than a grand. Way cheaper than a S300 variant.
Old 07-12-2009, 08:55 PM
  #13  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
theonlyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how can a set of twins be done for for what i want and under a grand?? Fill me in. Also wouldnt twins work better for me to?
Old 07-12-2009, 10:39 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
dieselman2300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful USA!
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stock turbo with a HT3B and you build the piping. Not that hard.
HT3Bs are under $600.
Old 07-14-2009, 09:19 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
timebomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL... I have over $150 in my oil feed lines


Quick Reply: twin turbo alternative??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM.