turbo decision
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: pacific north wet
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
turbo decision
trying to decide between just a regular 62/14 and one of the 71 series 62/14's.
is the low drive presure wheel that big of an advantage? or does it make it lagy at low boost. ?
mods are listed im my sig. clutch will be coming @ same time.
future mods: injectors?, snow stage 2?, and of course some sort of pusher pump.
useage: mostly dayly driving, 70/30 stop&go/hwy. i currently dont tow, but plans are for a boat, and a trilor to tow the jeep. so nothing real heavy by most of you alls standards.
or if some one else has sugestions post up.
is the low drive presure wheel that big of an advantage? or does it make it lagy at low boost. ?
mods are listed im my sig. clutch will be coming @ same time.
future mods: injectors?, snow stage 2?, and of course some sort of pusher pump.
useage: mostly dayly driving, 70/30 stop&go/hwy. i currently dont tow, but plans are for a boat, and a trilor to tow the jeep. so nothing real heavy by most of you alls standards.
or if some one else has sugestions post up.
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I recommend going to a sps or silver 62, work excellent, and great for towing too. I will be able to post how it is in a real race situation after this weekend (im hoping)
Kevin
Kevin
#3
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wetaskiwin canada
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've had a 71 series 62/14 for a couple of months now and i couldn't be happier with it.Spools pretty good and egts are almost a non-issue. I love a big turbo for tailgaters, can you say smoke screen.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the shop
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will probably get flamed for this
but
its the truth
the 62/14 is ok for light to medium towing
even great for romp'n around empty and making high rpm HP
but
is
ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS FOR HEAVY TOWING
it doesnt have enough spool at or below 2000 rpm
my stocker will tow heavier loads at lower egt's and get better fuel mileage, just cant romp on it too hard
but
its the truth
the 62/14 is ok for light to medium towing
even great for romp'n around empty and making high rpm HP
but
is
ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS FOR HEAVY TOWING
it doesnt have enough spool at or below 2000 rpm
my stocker will tow heavier loads at lower egt's and get better fuel mileage, just cant romp on it too hard
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will probably get flamed for this
but
its the truth
the 62/14 is ok for light to medium towing
even great for romp'n around empty and making high rpm HP
but
is
ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS FOR HEAVY TOWING
it doesnt have enough spool at or below 2000 rpm
my stocker will tow heavier loads at lower egt's and get better fuel mileage, just cant romp on it too hard
but
its the truth
the 62/14 is ok for light to medium towing
even great for romp'n around empty and making high rpm HP
but
is
ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS FOR HEAVY TOWING
it doesnt have enough spool at or below 2000 rpm
my stocker will tow heavier loads at lower egt's and get better fuel mileage, just cant romp on it too hard
#6
Registered User
I will probably get flamed for this
but
its the truth
the 62/14 is ok for light to medium towing
even great for romp'n around empty and making high rpm HP
but
is
ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS FOR HEAVY TOWING
it doesnt have enough spool at or below 2000 rpm
my stocker will tow heavier loads at lower egt's and get better fuel mileage, just cant romp on it too hard
but
its the truth
the 62/14 is ok for light to medium towing
even great for romp'n around empty and making high rpm HP
but
is
ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS FOR HEAVY TOWING
it doesnt have enough spool at or below 2000 rpm
my stocker will tow heavier loads at lower egt's and get better fuel mileage, just cant romp on it too hard
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats the ticket there!!!
My SPS62 has no troubles spooling hauling around my 12,000+ lbs 5'ver. No egt problems if i watch what i do and still get good mileage!!!
Jon.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the shop
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im talkin 26,000 cgvw
in overdrive at 60 mph, just maintaining speed the exhaust temps sit at 1250 - stock turbo under same condition sits at 950 degrees
theres just not enough drive pressure at low speeds to give enough boost to keep it cool
wound out tight , high rpms , cools great but money out the tail pipe
in overdrive at 60 mph, just maintaining speed the exhaust temps sit at 1250 - stock turbo under same condition sits at 950 degrees
theres just not enough drive pressure at low speeds to give enough boost to keep it cool
wound out tight , high rpms , cools great but money out the tail pipe
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta
Posts: 5,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am around23 24k gcvw, and love my turbo, I have no problems maintaining speed even on the biggest of grades. Been through the rocky mountains with mine, worked awesome
Kevin
Kevin
#10
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: pacific north wet
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have a gut feeling spooling up shuldnt be a problem...
flat ground, rollin in to it today from about 1k.. by 1200rpm i was making almost 20 lbs on the stock turbo, then the clutch let loose.. oops.
dam i love this beta smarty!
flat ground, rollin in to it today from about 1k.. by 1200rpm i was making almost 20 lbs on the stock turbo, then the clutch let loose.. oops.
dam i love this beta smarty!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
13ALPHA
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
6
08-14-2007 09:04 PM
Grey Goose
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
4
04-26-2007 12:02 AM
James Lucas
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
28
09-01-2003 03:25 PM