3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

how restrictive is the stock muffler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2005, 06:57 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
EKUgrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how restrictive is the stock muffler?

I have an 05 and was considering upgrading the intake to something like a BHAF or similar. Would I be wasting my time if I left the muffler stock?

Thanks.
Old 10-05-2005, 08:59 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Mark Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nashvile Tennessee
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EKUgrad,

The stock Dodge, or Ford and GM mufflers for that matter are very restrictive, we have one of each laying around that we cut open years ago, it's amazing to me that the trucks run as well as they do stock! They have louvers in them as small as 1/8th of an inch, three chambers that are blocked off with only 1 2-2.5 inch pass thru etc etc. The best part is if you get a good muffler to replace it with the sound level still stays nears stock on a diesel! Do a search here on replacement mufflers you'll get a ton of info. If you have any questions just call us up, we'll be glad to help!

Mark @ DPPI
Old 10-05-2005, 09:15 AM
  #3  
zog
Registered User
 
zog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, I disagree....I replaced the stock muffler with an aftermarket unit and the only result was a noisy roar....after 3 weeks I replaced the stock muffler and the truck ran better...more low end torque that was lost with the aftermarket unit...

I have been told that this is because I have no other mods....
Old 10-05-2005, 09:36 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Siberian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stock muffler on the 05 from the cat back flows 320cfms. Increase that and you can gain a little.
Old 10-05-2005, 01:09 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Nuttymopar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: East Montpelier, VT.
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EKUGrad. By putting on a better airbox or even just replacing the stock air filter with something better will only help. It will allow the motor to get more air which should lower your EGT's down a little. But granted, replacing the stock muffler will make the intake upgrade that much better as now it has a place to go.

Gauges should be the first purchase as then you can get a good baseline of what the stock truck can do.
Old 10-05-2005, 05:51 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
EKUgrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for the responses. I really don't want to do any big mods, was just thinking about the fact that I get a good deal of black smoke when I romp on it on exit ramps and was wondering if this could be corrected (some) by getting more air flow.
Old 10-05-2005, 09:32 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Herrin811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
will reducing backpressure on a diesel cause a loss of low-end tq like on a gasser? The line between too much and not enough is a fine line isnt it??
Old 10-06-2005, 03:14 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Hounddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ila georgia
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On my 03 installing the AFE stage1 setup did nothing for MPG.When I replaced the exhasust with the full 4 inch from Banks including the turbo down pipe it was a INSTANT increase in MPG.About 1.5 or 2.Rest overhead and on first test drive with new exhaust I got better mpg the I ever saw previous.
Old 10-06-2005, 03:41 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Dodgezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 8,803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Diesels don't need backpressure like a gas engine.
Old 10-06-2005, 03:47 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Hounddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ila georgia
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May not need back pressure but too LARGE of a exhaust reduces power with out the h.p. to back it up.This has been hashed and discussed many times on several forums with dino results showing the same findings.
Old 10-06-2005, 08:07 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Mark Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nashvile Tennessee
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nuttymopar,

You're correct, you have to add intake air if you free up the exhaust air. Doing one without considering doing both is a mistake overall for MPG and EGT drop. If all you do is add something like our MBRP replacement muffler that sets you up with the stock 4 inch pipes to create a pretty good 4 inch system and don't get more air in the intake side you sort of creating a suction that can't be satisfied. I haven't ever heard until today of anyone losing power or bottom end by just replacing the muffler. We have sold hundreds of the MBRP replacement mufflers for the 3rd gens and have had nothing but reports of EGT drop, spool up times decreased and nicer exhaust tone etc.

Mark @ DPPI
Old 10-06-2005, 12:08 PM
  #12  
zog
Registered User
 
zog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, the biggest reason I removed the aftermarket muffler was the noticeable decrease in low end power...I added the muffler as the ONLY modification, with no intake air box change (may have been a problem).

I noticed that the power seemed to increase at 70 mph but off the line is was a real dog.

After I put the stock muffler back on, my low end torque came back.
Old 10-06-2005, 05:28 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Hounddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ila georgia
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if memory serves me correct the STOCK exhaust(maybe just the muffler)flows 300 and some CFM. The muffler I use was advertised to flo 900+ cfm. lots of straight piped trucks out there.Never heard of any mention of loos of low end/low speed power with a muffler delete or a more free flowing one.
Old 10-08-2005, 12:54 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
txctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Howe, Tx
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
now correct me if I'm wrong, but a turbo diesel is an entirely different animal than a naturally aspirated gasser. With the turbo in the loop the backpressure is a mute point because you are compressing air into the engine mechanically. The only thing you have to keep in mind is the velosity of the air moving through the turbo. So with that said if you open up one end you have to open up the other to get the full benefit. I suspect the loss of low end power is a result of the turbo having to suck through a smaller straw with less force on the turbine because of less pressure on the exhaust side causing a slower spool up. Just my way of looking at it. Hope it gets you thinking.
Old 10-08-2005, 06:39 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
nickleinonen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: markham, ontario, canada
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect the loss of low end power is a result of the turbo having to suck through a smaller straw with less force on the turbine because of less pressure on the exhaust side causing a slower spool up.
a turbo on a diesel will spool best with 0 restriction on the exit of the turbine. the greater the pressure differential across the turbine housing, and the more heat you feed the turbine, the quicker it will spool. i don't believe the loss in spool has anything to do with the restriction it self, but could very much be due to the temprature decrease when having a non restrictive exhaust. having a insulating blaknet around the turbine housing and on the exhaust manifold will make the charger spool [a little] better


Quick Reply: how restrictive is the stock muffler?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.