3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years Talk about the 2003 and up Dodge Ram here. PLEASE, NO ENGINE OR DRIVETRAIN DISCUSSION!.

MPG There must be more to it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2006, 09:29 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
sweetwaterguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MPG There must be more to it

I am one of the lucky ones with excellent fuel economy--typically 20+ running empty and and mostly highway. For those doubters of my math skills, I do know my gazintas. (two gazinta four two times)
The big issue is why? Many have asked for help, and on this forum we typically give the same old answers, assuming that each CTD is exactly the same out of the factory. There must be more to it. What are other variables other than rpm's, speed, heavy foot, etc. Are there mechanics out there that have some insight into this?
Old 10-30-2006, 07:45 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
SupaDupa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO, and I don't care about offending anyone, is that poor mileage woes are usually driver related. I'm with you SWG, I've always gotten good mileage with my truck. I've towed with it since the day I got it. Nothing heavy like some guys on here, but I tow 5k most everyday of the week going from job to job. When I read most posts on here saying that, "I drive like a Granny", I usually take it with a grain of salt. I do drive like a Granny, both towing and empty, because I almost always have all the other cars passing me both city and highway!! The best I've gotten is 21.2mpg hand calculated on a 500 mile round trip running empty at 65mph!!
Old 10-30-2006, 08:14 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
v8440's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tire pressure is a big one, missed astoundingly often in these discussions. Front tire pressure is ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL to mileage-as in, you must have enough of it. I run 80 psi in my diesels up front.

Another thing that probably plays a role in mileage differences is slight manufacturing tolerances in the crank position sensor pickup and tone wheel assembly. I've seen at least one or two people comment on how they did the tone ring mod, and in the process discovered that there was a bit of slack in there from the factory. I can't remember exactly where the slack was, but it was enough to make a degree or two of difference in timing from one truck to another. That's enough to account for noticeable differences in mileage.

I don't know if this last thing is common at all, but it is also possible for one or more injectors to be bad in an insidious way, in this case meaning that the truck seems to drive fine, but just never gets good mileage. It does not have to result in fuel being dumped into the crankcase or billowing clouds of white smoke. Unfortunately, the dealerships will probably not do much if any injector testing based on vague complaints of poor mileage. It's hard for me to blame them too-they would be doing nothing but testing perfectly good injectors because people with low tire pressure and poor driving habits were complaining about low mileage. The downside to that is there are probably bad injectors running around out there that haven't acted up in a specific, easily identifiable way, costing their owners money on wasted fuel.
Old 10-30-2006, 02:50 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
ShaneCTD600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I with you guys, running 19-21 MPG at 65 MPH but at 70-75 it drops to 17-18. My tire pressure is 55-60psi both front and back with the stock tires and 65k miles.
Old 10-30-2006, 03:23 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
BMH95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At 65, I can get a little over 20. However, if I'm moving at 80, it's more like 16.6. It all depends on how you drive it. Most don't have the patience to accelerate up to 50mph while keeping the RPMs under 1800. Mixed driving I can keep mine at 17.5.
Old 10-30-2006, 03:31 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
v8440's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ShaneCTD600
I with you guys, running 19-21 MPG at 65 MPH but at 70-75 it drops to 17-18. My tire pressure is 55-60psi both front and back with the stock tires and 65k miles.
Go on and run the fronts up to 80-see what happens.
Old 10-30-2006, 03:31 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
paul4romtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure there is more to it. Currently I am at about 9000 miles on my 2006. It is an automatic, 4x4, 373 gears. I average about 18-19 on the highway, but at first it was maybe 14-15. The biggest improvement I saw was after I made several long hauls when I moved 400 miles across state and when I move my horse around from barn to barn, etc. I also pull my bass boat about 75% of the time. Now, when I drive empty or not towing, not only is mileage better, but the truck runs much, much better. Now, if I had a standard transmission, then my mileage would be even better, for obvious reasons. This is what most people dont ever realize when they compare one truck to the next, especially on the internet. A standard will be better then an auto, a 4x2 will be slightly better then a 4x4. It confuses me when people get on here and complain about fuel economy. I mean, you bought one of the largest vehicles on the market, what did you expect? The other thing to consider is how you work your truck. A guy who tows good weight and makes long trips is going to see that better MPG long before the guy who drives 15 miles to work everyday or tows a light load once a month. There are lots of variables you can attribute, but overall, you have to break the engine in. This means making it work, making it pull, haul, run for hundreds of miles nonstop.
Old 10-30-2006, 03:39 PM
  #8  
Administrator/Jarhead
 
madhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 14,965
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Must be nice... When I drive like granny, I see MAYBE 17. Wierd... On a long hwy trip, my milage is good at first, then it get's worse, using the cruise and flat road. It can go from 17.5 to 14, and I pay attention to the way that I drive. I know it has something to do with my low gear rear end and bigger tires, but you guys are saying 20-22, there seems to be something wrong???
Old 10-30-2006, 05:23 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
bluebull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where hell freezes over.
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by madhat
Must be nice... When I drive like granny, I see MAYBE 17. Wierd... On a long hwy trip, my milage is good at first, then it get's worse, using the cruise and flat road. It can go from 17.5 to 14, and I pay attention to the way that I drive. I know it has something to do with my low gear rear end and bigger tires, but you guys are saying 20-22, there seems to be something wrong???
Have you recalibrated your speedometer for bigger tires?
Old 10-30-2006, 05:36 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Herrin811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last week I drove 374.6 miles, mixed about 50/50 city-highway 25.004 gal=14.98 mpg However, on the trip back home, 98% interstate I made 22.34 mpg.....Cruise set at 2000rpm.....I drive on the tach, not the speedo...If it matters 2K is 73mph


BTW I run 32oz of PS White/MMO mixed 50/50 per tank....I see 1.5-2 better with this than with straight fuel
Old 10-30-2006, 06:28 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
anni2VADER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OREGON
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V8440 hit the nail on the head, air pressure is everything. the cummins weighs over a thousand pounds. thats a heavy front end. keep those tires at max. last summer i made it from portland to shasta lake,(in cali) and back to medford on 1 tank, 658 miles with a couple gallons left,hand calced to about 20ish even with the 4.10s cruising at 65. I run my tire pressure a couple pounds above max. thats a huge key me thinks.
Old 10-30-2006, 09:19 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
TurboTed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BMH95
At 65, I can get a little over 20. However, if I'm moving at 80, it's more like 16.6. It all depends on how you drive it. Most don't have the patience to accelerate up to 50mph while keeping the RPMs under 1800. Mixed driving I can keep mine at 17.5.

My truck is not even near break-in, and I agree with these figures. I know it is not possible to drive at 50mph long distance in most situations, but I have tried it a few times when there's little traffic, late at night etc. Mileage at that speed on my truck(s) has been incredible, and I mean 25+ US mpg. I seem to remember the "gas crisis" of the 70's when the speed limits were reduced and enforced at 50 mph in a lot of places. Imagine the savings on fuel world wide if these speeds were possible??
Old 10-30-2006, 09:39 PM
  #13  
DTR's Cow Boss
 
DodgeCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dufur Or
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
my truck was always a constant 16 empty running to an from work since the new lift pump i just filled up for the first time since and i gain about 2.5ish to 3mpg i averaged 18.5mpg an that was one load of hay so now ill see what i get not towing any thing for this tank. I figured out also if you fill up at the line just under the half mark it don't hurt the check books feelings as bad
Old 10-30-2006, 09:46 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
04ctd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 1,578
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by v8440
Go on and run the fronts up to 80-see what happens.
that beat you up bad on ride? roads in SC are "historic" - in other words, about the same conditions as Columbus found them, when he came over here looking for a CTD

roads here about beat your teeth out your head.
Old 10-30-2006, 11:29 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
wcjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tacoma, Wa
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 3rd Gen justs gets bad mileage compared to my 96' 12v 5spd. My 96' had the same power on the dyno as my 06'. I didn't care how I drove the 96'. The 06' is driven very nicely at slightly slower speeds paying attention to boost.

96' = 19-20mpg
06' = 17.5-18mpg

Combo of heavier vehicle, different gearing and emissions.


Quick Reply: MPG There must be more to it



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 AM.