12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain Talk about the 12V engine and drivetrain here. This is for 1994-1998.5 engine and drivetrain discussion only.

First Post: Lots of Qs: efficiency

Old 08-17-2006, 03:58 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
huckstep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question First Post: TC, VB, drive ratios, gauges

First what I'm trying to gain: Fuel mileage, and reliability.

After all, that's why I chose a Cummins...

I just bought a 96 2500 4x4 w 155K miles, it already has a K&N air filter and some kind of custom split exhaust.

The transmission is original stock and still shifts fine but the Torque Converter seems to have a few problems (locks in 1st and R, won't lock at freeway speed etc.) I may be able to get the TC fixed with just with a new TCC solenoid, but I might just go ahead and get a good TC now since I know it'll happen pretty soon anyway.

3 Main Questions:
1.) I'm thinking about changing the final drive ratio from 4.1 to at least 3.55 or 3.23 or maybe even 3.08 like some of the 1st gens had. The main reason is to gain fuel efficiency, please tell me if think this is a bad idea. Also I wonder if I'll have any problem towing an 8,000 lb travel trailer with the taller gearing. I'm thinking if I do, I can always put in a #8 or #10 plate to bring up the power to compensate (gotta find some reason to justify power ).

2.) Will a good TC be enough in the tranny for now with the fairly mild mods I'm contemplating? I'm assuming the stock tranny will die at some point, but will it's death be significantly accelarated by not getting a built valve body? A good tight TC is important to me because it'll give both better mileage and reliability, but I'm not sure what a VB would gain me at this point.

3.) Is an EGT gauge important for me with at most a #10 plate? What about boost?

I'm pretty sure I will get a Tranny temp gauge.

I thought about asking about stall speed etc on the TC to meet my goals but I figured any of the big 3 would be able to answer that question when the time came.

Thanks! I've learned a ton just from reading the old posts already!!
Old 08-17-2006, 07:01 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
infidel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 14,672
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
At least a pyro is essential if you are anything but stock.
Lowering your rpms won't effect fuel economy much at all. Slowing down is more important due to increasing aerodynamic drag the faster you go.
Ask anyone who has lost 5th gear and had to drive extended miles without it. Revved up higher but still going slower most all find their best mpgs ever.
People that have an aftermarket overdrive unit also report no gain in mpgs.
Old 08-17-2006, 09:54 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
huckstep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by infidel
People that have an aftermarket overdrive unit also report no gain in mpgs.
Wow, that is great feedback.

So there's no reason to consider something like a GearVendor?

I'd wondered why I hadn't seen any in peoples sigs.
Old 08-17-2006, 10:16 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
displacedtexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Place with no quail:(
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by huckstep
So there's no reason to consider something like a GearVendor?
You would probally never recover the cost of the unit in fuel savings. It also adds more drivline drag to overcome...
Old 08-17-2006, 11:09 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
torquefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 4,449
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
My 96 has 3.55 gears. I find this to be the ideal gear ratio for towing, and driving solo as well.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
J Cook
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
8
12-16-2007 07:30 PM
rbrettctd
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
4
05-31-2007 12:34 PM
muddin4fun
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
07-22-2004 09:11 AM
RCC_SaMiaM
1st Gen. Ram - All Topics
3
12-01-2002 11:52 AM
NWDave
Other
1
11-29-2002 09:59 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: First Post: Lots of Qs: efficiency



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.