3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007 5.9 liter Engine and drivetrain discussion only. PLEASE, NO HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION!

Brake Rotor Specs ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2009, 11:05 AM
  #1  
FMB
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Old Norte Mexico
Posts: 1,218
Received 68 Likes on 62 Posts
Brake Rotor Specs ???

I had a mechanic put in new U Joints last week and he said my front pads are down to almost nothing (I knew it was about time) and he wanted to change them as he had everything apart. Additionally, he said the rotors couldn't be turned as they are at minimum already. His measurements of the rotors are LF 43.03mm and RF 43.34mm. He states 43mm is the minimum.

These are original rotors, ~177k miles, have gone through original plus 2 pair of replacement OEM pads (on second pair now). The rotors have never been 'turned'. I've not had any issues with these rotors, no warpage or fade.

I didn't gift him the work. Any ideas out there as to the longevity of un-turned rotors? Guess I'll measure when I get in there though.
Old 08-28-2009, 02:07 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
.boB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The service manual does not list the specs. It says that the specs are stamped into the hub.
Old 08-28-2009, 02:14 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
bushusmarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to long ago i did all four corners on my truck at 120k. I also couldnt turn my front ones, but my back are OE and there was barely enough to turn. Where your at sounds about right, your rotors are just worn down. But this is just my opinion
Old 08-28-2009, 03:41 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
torquefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 4,449
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
I would believe that the rotors may be worn out, even without previous machining. They changed the composition of the lining when they switched to dual-piston calipers in 2000. The pads are now really hard on rotors, compared to the older stuff. They seem to wear the rotors on a taper too.
Old 08-29-2009, 11:30 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
trik396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
170,000+ miles on rotors sounds great to me... sounds like you got your money's worth and then some.
Old 08-31-2009, 10:22 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
sdmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting that much mileage out of your originals is pretty good. I had to replace my fronts at 80k. Lots of stop and go. I went with EBC rotors and pads up front and saw a vast improvement over stock.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kaysee
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
1
08-09-2009 04:28 PM
06RAMCTD
3rd Gen Engine and Drivetrain -> 2003-2007
0
12-19-2006 04:15 PM
Dave88LX
2nd Gen. Dodge Ram - No Drivetrain
4
11-06-2005 12:19 AM
7mmrum
12 Valve Engine and Drivetrain
36
09-08-2004 12:09 PM
Caincando1
HELP!
6
10-12-2003 02:25 PM



Quick Reply: Brake Rotor Specs ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.