boxes
01-06-2005, 03:26 AM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SE MI
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fountain,
Do you have an auto or manual transmission? I think that should be your deciding factor. If a stock auto, I would stick with the Edge EZ, nothing more then 80hp. You would be surprised at what floats in a stock 48RE tranny pan. Been there, done that.
If you have the stick, TST. You will know when the clutch slips.
Mike
Do you have an auto or manual transmission? I think that should be your deciding factor. If a stock auto, I would stick with the Edge EZ, nothing more then 80hp. You would be surprised at what floats in a stock 48RE tranny pan. Been there, done that.
If you have the stick, TST. You will know when the clutch slips.
Mike
01-06-2005, 10:26 AM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Fountain,
The Ramifier now has adjustable **** and can be set from 0-100hp to fit your driving habits and adjusted when you want. Since it is a programable box you don't have to worry about excessive fuel rail pressures. This might be something that would fit your needs better.
Dennis
The Ramifier now has adjustable **** and can be set from 0-100hp to fit your driving habits and adjusted when you want. Since it is a programable box you don't have to worry about excessive fuel rail pressures. This might be something that would fit your needs better.
Dennis
01-06-2005, 10:38 AM
#7
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Edge will hopefully have the juice and attitude available soon it will be a superior product plenty of power provided where needed low and midrange it works awesome on the 600
Trending Topics
01-06-2005, 10:46 AM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Kyle,
Wonder why they don't address top end? I guess they don't think it is important, I personally think the top end is just as important as the Low and Mid ranges. They must still be using resistors to make power and have to shut the power down before they reach excessive fuel rail pressures?
Dennis
Wonder why they don't address top end? I guess they don't think it is important, I personally think the top end is just as important as the Low and Mid ranges. They must still be using resistors to make power and have to shut the power down before they reach excessive fuel rail pressures?
Dennis
01-06-2005, 11:04 AM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Dennis Perry
Kyle,
They must still be using resistors to make power and have to shut the power down before they reach excessive fuel rail pressures?
Dennis
Kyle,
They must still be using resistors to make power and have to shut the power down before they reach excessive fuel rail pressures?
Dennis
01-06-2005, 02:41 PM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Dennis Perry
Banshee,
Then my question still remains? Why do they not address top end??
Dennis
Banshee,
Then my question still remains? Why do they not address top end??
Dennis
John
01-07-2005, 11:18 AM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Banshee,
That's my point. If they are using injector duration and timing then there is no reason you can't gain 100hp and still keep egt's in check throughout the entire RPM range. I know you are not affiliated with selling products but there is some misunderstanding when it comes to making useable hp when adding boxes. The Ramifier makes 100hp and we are able to maintain power throughout the entire RPM range and maintain lower egt's with only programing the fuel pressure and map sensor. With our programming we rewrite the fuel and boost map to never exceed high fuel rail pressures, so it seems to me that using injector duraration and timing isn't any better then using the fuel pressure and map signals.
I am not trying to start an arguement only a discussion so please don't take my post in any other context.
That's my point. If they are using injector duration and timing then there is no reason you can't gain 100hp and still keep egt's in check throughout the entire RPM range. I know you are not affiliated with selling products but there is some misunderstanding when it comes to making useable hp when adding boxes. The Ramifier makes 100hp and we are able to maintain power throughout the entire RPM range and maintain lower egt's with only programing the fuel pressure and map sensor. With our programming we rewrite the fuel and boost map to never exceed high fuel rail pressures, so it seems to me that using injector duraration and timing isn't any better then using the fuel pressure and map signals.
I am not trying to start an arguement only a discussion so please don't take my post in any other context.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
t-boe
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
7
01-04-2007 08:35 AM
FireNhole
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
14
02-06-2003 07:29 PM
hellotbone
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
11
10-08-2002 07:17 PM