bfgoodrich's Mud terrain on 2nd Gen Let see 'em!
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lecco, Italy
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bfgoodrich's Mud terrain on 2nd Gen Let see 'em!
hi guys I have a great deal on a set of bfg MUD tires but want to see how they looks on 2nd gen! I have 285s on mine
i run A/T now...what about road noise w m/t?
thanks!!!! rob
i run A/T now...what about road noise w m/t?
thanks!!!! rob
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: greensboro
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[IMG][/IMG]
Here is 35"s and I dont think they are that noisy. I like them alot better than previous mud tires I have had on a jeep (mtr's and buckshots) and not much louder than my brothers bfg a/ts were. Wear still up in the air on wear since I don't have many miles on them.
Here is 35"s and I dont think they are that noisy. I like them alot better than previous mud tires I have had on a jeep (mtr's and buckshots) and not much louder than my brothers bfg a/ts were. Wear still up in the air on wear since I don't have many miles on them.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Posts: 7,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had 305/70R16 MT's when I bought my truck. Handled fine on the pavement, but they were quite noisy. You could almost hear them over the engine. I only had them on my truck for about 3000 km before I got my H2's and put on a more highway friendly tire.
Trending Topics
#10
Registered User
I'm personally not wild about the KM's tread design.
Looks as though they might clog up (mud & wet snow) as easily as the A/T's, which is their one drawback. Anyone know?
The M/T's clear beautifully!
RJ
Looks as though they might clog up (mud & wet snow) as easily as the A/T's, which is their one drawback. Anyone know?
The M/T's clear beautifully!
RJ
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jonesboro, TEXAS
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My KM's work good dont clean out quite as good as the old MT's but they are a lot better than the AT's ever thought of doing. I like them better in the sand than the MT's. I dont think the MT's are to noisey. I have had 5 sets of 33-12.50-16.5 between my 92 and 96 ( I drive a LOOOOOT avarage just over 1K a week) Got over 40-45K out of each set.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jonesboro, TEXAS
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my 305-65-17 are E rated. and the 33-12.50-16.5 that are in the pic haul out 8500lb work trailer all the time and a 32ft tandem duel and John Deere 410 D back hoe regularly. With that one I come across the scales at 29,830lb and with 55psi in the rear there is no prob at all. pull the same load with my 08 with the KM II's and it dose great. Look at the weight rating in lbs a big D some times show to carry more lbs than a small E.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
M1AM14SPUR
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
14
07-28-2011 10:47 PM
Red3quarter
Other
541
12-12-2009 11:12 PM
DBM
3rd Gen High Performance and Accessories (5.9L Only)
17
11-08-2007 05:25 PM
Boss Hoss 540
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
22
10-07-2007 09:52 PM