Added More pics..
04-24-2004, 10:26 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morgan, Utah
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Added More pics..
I've added some more pics here:
http://www.turbodieselregister.com/u...&albumid=16437
The crank wasn't too far out of balance but the rods were bad. #4 con rods was 32 grams heavier than the lightest rod(#3) the others where 18 to 24 grams heavy.
Also have pics of reciever groove in block to match the head o-ring and another o-ring out side the reciver groove in the block.
Also came up with a great thermo coating that I coated my ATS manifold with as well as the exhaust ports in the head.
http://www.turbodieselregister.com/u...&albumid=16437
The crank wasn't too far out of balance but the rods were bad. #4 con rods was 32 grams heavier than the lightest rod(#3) the others where 18 to 24 grams heavy.
Also have pics of reciever groove in block to match the head o-ring and another o-ring out side the reciver groove in the block.
Also came up with a great thermo coating that I coated my ATS manifold with as well as the exhaust ports in the head.
04-24-2004, 10:34 PM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: stupid ohio
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Added More pics..
Originally posted by drawson
The cranks wasn't too far out of balance but the rods where bad. #4 con rods was 32 grams heavier than the lightest rod(#3) the others where 18 to 24 grams heavy.
The cranks wasn't too far out of balance but the rods where bad. #4 con rods was 32 grams heavier than the lightest rod(#3) the others where 18 to 24 grams heavy.
brandon.
04-24-2004, 11:01 PM
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morgan, Utah
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are the factory rods.
In the one pic you can see the tops that where ground down and also there is material removed from the bottom weight block on the rods.
In the one pic you can see the tops that where ground down and also there is material removed from the bottom weight block on the rods.
04-26-2004, 12:47 PM
#5
DTR Founder
Re: Added More pics..
Originally posted by drawson
I've added some more pics here:
http://www.turbodieselregister.com/...?&albumid=16437
The crank wasn't too far out of balance but the rods were bad. #4 con rods was 32 grams heavier than the lightest rod(#3) the others where 18 to 24 grams heavy.
Also have pics of reciever groove in block to match the head o-ring and another o-ring out side the reciver groove in the block.
Also came up with a great thermo coating that I coated my ATS manifold with as well as the exhaust ports in the head.
I've added some more pics here:
http://www.turbodieselregister.com/...?&albumid=16437
The crank wasn't too far out of balance but the rods were bad. #4 con rods was 32 grams heavier than the lightest rod(#3) the others where 18 to 24 grams heavy.
Also have pics of reciever groove in block to match the head o-ring and another o-ring out side the reciver groove in the block.
Also came up with a great thermo coating that I coated my ATS manifold with as well as the exhaust ports in the head.
04-26-2004, 02:00 PM
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morgan, Utah
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mighty Goat
General Diesel Discussion
34
01-31-2008 11:20 AM
98ramtough
3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years
3
07-03-2007 01:16 PM
dieselminded
Performance and Accessories 2nd gen only
6
09-18-2004 11:14 AM