3rd Generation Ram - Non Drivetrain - All Years Talk about the 2003 and up Dodge Ram here. PLEASE, NO ENGINE OR DRIVETRAIN DISCUSSION!.

6.7 Cab and Chassis Test drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2006, 12:08 PM
  #1  
Chapter President
Thread Starter
 
Duallydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Big Spring (now Stephenville), Tx
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6.7 Cab and Chassis Test drive

Well I went by the dealer here and drove one of the cab and chassis. Single cab ST 4X4 6spd (he said they wouldn't have the auto for a few months). Looks like there is a sensor between the cat and the muffler (which is smaller than mine) and there is another sensor on the air box. Driving wise it rides as smooth or smoother than my truck even though it was single cab and no weight on the back. It seems to idle at 800rpm and there is a new light on start up which looks like it might be for something electrical. Power wise it feels like it takes off like most of them do at 1700 rpm. There isn't night and day difference between the turbos on lag but it's still better. It is quieter.
Old 10-02-2006, 10:40 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
6cylinders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 168
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I want one! Was it a short wheelbase or long? Are there any of the 6 speed autos out yet? Has anyone driven one yet?
Old 10-03-2006, 08:33 AM
  #3  
Chapter President
Thread Starter
 
Duallydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Big Spring (now Stephenville), Tx
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was one of the short wheel bases. And who knows about the autos. That did feel like one hauling sucker. Too bad even if I had the money I wouldn't buy it. If I buy a new one and I keep my 04 (it will be my main hauler) I would get a SRW Single cab so I can get parked easier at the college. That also depends on me doing really good at some ropings. I may still find me a single cab 2500 or (dare I say it) 99-02 F-250. I probably will never own a truck with the G-56 manual, unless I have to have my tranny replaced in my 04 and they have a hard time finding a NV.
Old 10-03-2006, 12:28 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
schorb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weatherford, TEXAS
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wait....short wheel base??? Am I reading this right that you drove a single cab short bed with a Cummins???? I didn't think there was such a thing?
Old 10-03-2006, 01:42 PM
  #5  
Chapter President
Thread Starter
 
Duallydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Big Spring (now Stephenville), Tx
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What it is on the short wheel base is a regular length frame for a long bed single cab, but the long wheel base is equivilent to a quad cab long bed I think. Or somewhere around there. That would be one hot rod of a truck a shortbed single cab Cummins. Might have better traction since the engine would almost be on the rear wheels.
Old 10-03-2006, 03:38 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
grdnw523's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Stephenville and New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Duallydog was it at Bruners in Stephenville?
Old 10-03-2006, 03:44 PM
  #7  
Chapter President
Thread Starter
 
Duallydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Big Spring (now Stephenville), Tx
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep. (I would keep it that short but I need to have 10 characters on here so I have just exceed the requirement by alot) I guess I'm being verbose on this thread.
Old 10-05-2006, 12:37 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
BigDave12768's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Look at this motor. What a mess

Old 10-05-2006, 02:34 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
pet05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is all of that EXTRA STUFF?? Looks like installing a PYRO will be MUCH harder on this setup.

Is it emissions nonsense?
Old 10-05-2006, 06:53 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
schorb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weatherford, TEXAS
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It looks like someone forgot about the KISS principle!

Does anyone know the weight of this engine vs. the 5.9?
Old 10-05-2006, 07:15 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
35" 05''s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: nc
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by schorb
It looks like someone forgot about the KISS principle!

Does anyone know the weight of this engine vs. the 5.9?
OMG! its turning into a powerstroke!
Old 10-05-2006, 09:28 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
53 willys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 6,259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 35" 05'
OMG! its turning into a powerstroke!


X2 wow it's getting ugly in there!!!
Old 10-05-2006, 12:08 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
pet05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I HATE the clutter. It will even be hard to navigate your hand/arm down there to even do anything.

My WIFES Toyota Corolla has less clutter and more room than this setup will have. That is sad...

Thanks EPA! You Bas%$#@s!
Old 10-05-2006, 12:19 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Mcmopar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by BigDave12768
Look at this motor. What a mess

That "tube" must be the EGR.
Old 10-05-2006, 01:38 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
ROOFGOOF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Harford County MD
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All that stuff in their reminds me of my 6.0 Power stroke....gives me shivers.


Quick Reply: 6.7 Cab and Chassis Test drive



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.